Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blondebanshee

(353 posts)
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 04:08 PM Sep 2017

U.S. denies request for Puerto Rico shipping waiver

“Our dependence on fossil fuel imports by sea is hampering the restoration of services,” said Juan Declet-Barreto, an energy expert at the nonprofit group the Union of Concerned Scientists. The refusal to allow the waiver “is raising fears on the island that they are going to be left behind in this disaster.”


[link:http://www.reuters.com/article/us-storm-maria-puertorico-shipping/u-s-denies-request-for-puerto-rico-shipping-waiver-idUSKCN1C12UI?il=0|

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. denies request for Puerto Rico shipping waiver (Original Post) blondebanshee Sep 2017 OP
Now would be the time for renewable energy companies Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #1
+1 FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #3
The issue is damaged and non-operational ports FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #2
I was thinking about this opening line. Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #4
Agree. FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #5
This is an opportunity to build a green power grid Kaleva Sep 2017 #8
That century-old shipping law is ridiculous! procon Sep 2017 #6
Who benefits from the Jones Act? superpatriotman Sep 2017 #7

Delmette2.0

(4,164 posts)
1. Now would be the time for renewable energy companies
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 04:24 PM
Sep 2017

To make Puerto Rico energy independent. Every new building should be equipped with solar panels and small windmills.

Seriously, why rebuild an infrastructure that can be so easily disrupted.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
2. The issue is damaged and non-operational ports
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 04:27 PM
Sep 2017

The issue isn't enough ships. Reading the article, I agree with decision.

Delmette2.0

(4,164 posts)
4. I was thinking about this opening line.
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 04:35 PM
Sep 2017

Our dependence on fossil fuel imports by sea is hampering the restoration of services,”

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
5. Agree.
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 04:36 PM
Sep 2017

Imagine if every home had solar panels. Many would be damaged after the storm, but there would be some power even in remote areas.

Now is a chance to rebuild using solar.

procon

(15,805 posts)
6. That century-old shipping law is ridiculous!
Tue Sep 26, 2017, 04:43 PM
Sep 2017

Its an outdated relic from WWI that was intended to enshrine America as a nation of shipbuilders and seamen. The deck is stacked for US shipping businesses to profit off of the disaster in Puerto Rico. Since consumers must import everything, how much of their limited funds are going to be diverted to pay the higher cost of US shipping? Congress could have waived the law and let competition drive down the price... you know, something like that free market capitalism we keep hearing about, instead US citizens are the victims of legal price gouging.


A New York Fed report from 2012 shows that it costs twice as much to ship something from a port in the U.S. mainland to Puerto Rico as it does to ship to Jamaica and the Dominican Republic nearby. There are only a handful of Jones Act–compliant options, and that lack of competition allows U.S. shippers to charge much higher prices.

http://reason.com/blog/2017/09/25/hey-congress-if-you-really-want-to-help



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. denies request for P...