DOJ Seeking Info on 6,000 People Who Liked Anti-Trump Facebook Page

[n2doc]

The ACLU-DC is trying to stop three search warrants that’d let the Department of Justice snoop around protesters’ Facebook accounts over Inauguration Day protests. They filed in D.C. Superior Court on Thursday, saying the government’s demands violate the Fourth Amendment because they are so broad, and threatening First Amendment speech. These warrants ask for too much information not directly relevant to the federal probe, argues the ACLU. This includes information on the plaintiffs’ friends, associates, and the approximately 6000 individuals who just “liked” an anti-Donald Trump Facebook page. Requested data would go back to Nov. 1, 2016, a week before the presidential election.

“The warrants make no provision for avoiding or minimizing invasions into personal and associational/expression information, for preventing such information from being shared widely within the government, or for destroying irrelevant material when the investigation is concluded,” said the ACLU filing. In other words, this might chill First Amendment speech by giving the government means to observe anyone who were simply linked to anti-Trump protesters.

This fight stems from arrests made Jan. 20. Demonstrators came to Washington D.C. to protest President Donald Trump‘s inauguration, and over 200 ended up getting charged with felony rioting. In investigating the alleged criminality, the federal government later got three search warrants from the D.C. Superior Court against three Facebook accounts: the disruptj20 page (now known as Resist This) owned by Emmelia Talarico, and personal accounts owned by Lacy MacAuley, and Legba Carrefour. According to the ACLU, these people didn’t initially know about warrants because of a gag order. Facebook fought this gag order, which was later dropped by the government shortly before the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled on it. Talarico, MacAuley, and Carrefour hadn’t even been charged with Inauguration Day-related arrested by the US Attorney, said the ACLU.

The DOJ declined to comment.

more

https://lawnewz.com/crazy/doj-seeking-info-on-6000-people-who-liked-anti-trump-facebook-page/

There ain't no Justice in that Department.

[spanone]

1. what democracy?

[Iliyah]

2. What?

This is bullshit.

[winetourdriver01]

3. Justice?

Our beloved Republic died a lonely death sometime during the Reagan administration.

[brush]

4. Well, after the election day hacking we know they're on to us here at DU as well...

therefore, fuck trump, sessions and that whole stinking, cheating, Russian-colluding, traitorous repug party.

[arthritisR_US]

5. Your DOJ has regressed 100 years since January 20th.

[dembotoz]

6. Wonder how many of us r on that list

To like an anti Donald Trump page...nope..none of us..ever

[lastlib]

7. DOJ now DOOFUS*?

*Department Of Obnoxious Fascist Usurpation and Suppression

[Gothmog]

8. This is a vast over-reach by the Sessions DOJ