Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(9,238 posts)
Sat Sep 30, 2017, 01:12 PM Sep 2017

The numbers are in: Trump's tax plan is a bonanza for the rich, not the middle class

Multi-millionaires get more than $700,000 back. The poorest fifth gets $60.

The tax reform “framework” proposed by the Trump administration and Republican leaders in Congress would give the largest benefits to the top 1 and top 0.1 percent of households, according to a new analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. The poor and middle class would get comparatively little. And the whole thing would leave a $2.4 trillion hole in federal revenue in the first decade.



The richest 1 percent — households making at least $732,800 — would get an average tax cut of $129,030, the analysis finds. For the typical one-percenter (who earns much more than $732,800), that means 8.5 percent more income after taxes. The richest 0.1 percent, earning at least $3.4 million a year, would get $722,510 back on average, for a 10.2 percent average boost in after-tax income.

By contrast, the middle class (households earning $48,600 to $86,100 a year) would get $660 back, a 1.2 percent income boost. The poorest fifth of Americans, earning $25,000 or less, would only get $60, a 0.5 percent increase.


https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/9/29/16384274/big-six-tax-reform-congress-trump-tax-policy-center

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The numbers are in: Trump's tax plan is a bonanza for the rich, not the middle class (Original Post) CousinIT Sep 2017 OP
How many votes will be needed in the Senate to pass it? no_hypocrisy Sep 2017 #1
I thought it had to be revenue neutral to go through fast track. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #3
A boon for the privileged crass nt Xipe Totec Sep 2017 #2
K&R Scurrilous Sep 2017 #4

no_hypocrisy

(46,076 posts)
1. How many votes will be needed in the Senate to pass it?
Sat Sep 30, 2017, 01:22 PM
Sep 2017

50 because it will be incorporated into the next Budget or 60 to overcome a filibuster?

Voltaire2

(12,996 posts)
3. I thought it had to be revenue neutral to go through fast track.
Sat Sep 30, 2017, 02:58 PM
Sep 2017

But the rules are absurdly vague. My guess is that somehow this will be filibuster proof. If so, there will be zero Republicans against this, so it will pass.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The numbers are in: Trump...