Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People asking "is Harvey Weinstein's career over? (Original Post) HAB911 Oct 2017 OP
What did casey affleck do ? JI7 Oct 2017 #1
I didn't know either. frogmarch Oct 2017 #3
See this 2016 article on the issue... PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #4
I wouldn't exactly say Polanski is "thriving in Hollywood" as he can't set foot in the US... PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #2
Lisa Bloom‏ HAB911 Oct 2017 #5
What are your thoughts on the subject? oberliner Oct 2017 #6
Personally, I love movies out of the Weinstein shop HAB911 Oct 2017 #7
It's kind of weird though TexasBushwhacker Oct 2017 #13
He has a lot of enemies that are very happy right now Not Ruth Oct 2017 #8
Such as the numerous women he sexually harrassed oberliner Oct 2017 #9
More like most of Hollywod Not Ruth Oct 2017 #10
Sounds like an awful human being oberliner Oct 2017 #11
Victims is probably more accurate. JI7 Oct 2017 #14
It was pretty much over before this came out frazzled Oct 2017 #12

frogmarch

(12,153 posts)
3. I didn't know either.
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 01:26 PM
Oct 2017

I found this.

http://time.com/4645846/what-to-know-about-the-casey-affleck-oscar-controversy/

snip:

In 2010, two women who had worked on Affleck’s experimental film I’m Still Here filed sexual harassment suits against him. One of the women claimed that Affleck crawled into bed with her without her consent while she was asleep. He allegedly pressured the other woman to stay in his hotel room and “violently grabbed [her] arm in an effort to intimidate her into staying” when she refused, according to the complaint.

The women claimed he verbally disparaged them and directed a subordinate to expose himself to one of them, among other types of misconduct. They also said that Affleck and the film's star, Joaquin Phoenix, locked themselves in the women's shared hotel room with two other women, allegedly to have sex with them.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. I wouldn't exactly say Polanski is "thriving in Hollywood" as he can't set foot in the US...
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 01:25 PM
Oct 2017

without being arrested.

HAB911

(8,890 posts)
5. Lisa Bloom‏
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 01:39 PM
Oct 2017

I have resigned as an advisor to Harvey Weinstein.
My understanding is that Mr. Weinstein and his board are moving toward an agreement.


HAB911

(8,890 posts)
7. Personally, I love movies out of the Weinstein shop
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 01:43 PM
Oct 2017

great movies

Unless he repents, and he seems on the surface to be trying.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,175 posts)
13. It's kind of weird though
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 04:57 PM
Oct 2017

Harvey's behavior was kind of a Hollywood "secret" like Bill Cosby's behavior was. It was pretty well known, but people kept doing business with him and his brother Bob.

Then there's the alleged pedophiles in Hollywood that include Bryan Singer of X-Men and The Usual Suspects fame.

 

Not Ruth

(3,613 posts)
10. More like most of Hollywod
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 02:02 PM
Oct 2017

From 6 years ago.....

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2011/03/weinstein-miramax-201103


Everyone in the entertainment world knows his story. A middle-class kid from Queens, a onetime concert promoter who emerged with his brother in the early 1990s as the leading maker and marketer of independent films, Weinstein made his name during an unprecedented streak, from 1992 to 2003, when his beloved Miramax studio produced at least one best-picture nominee every year. The contradiction that made him so fascinating was how a man who produced such wonderful films—Trainspotting, Cold Mountain, Good Will Hunting, to name a few—could produce such boorish behavior. In Hollywood, everyone seems to have a favorite Harvey tirade. The time he told The New York Observer he was “the fucking sheriff of this fucking lawless piece-of-shit town.” The time he screamed at Terry McAuliffe, then chairman of the Democratic Party, over some now forgotten bit of political trivia: “You motherfucker! I’ll rip your balls off!” (Weinstein denies this happened.)

That was Harvey Weinstein then and, though such outbursts seem rare these days, probably still is. An aide tells the story of a “slight” tantrum he recently threw on the set of a movie filming outside London, after which he apologized for “being an asshole,” at which point someone piped up, “Yeah, but you’re our asshole, and we’re glad you’re back.” Ask his peers about Weinstein these days and you hear that kind of thing a lot. Where once he was viewed as a spitting, cursing blowhard, today, at 58, Weinstein is often described in warmer terms, as a throwback to the passionate, sometimes vulgar studio heads of yore, such as Harry Cohn and Jack Warner. Having sold Miramax to the Disney Company in 1993, then leaving in a rancorous dispute with its C.E.O., Michael Eisner, in 2005, he was surprised to find much of Hollywood actually cheering him on when he tried to buy back Miramax last year.

“I think just about everybody was rooting for them,” says Tom Freston, the former Viacom C.E.O., “because, while Harvey is sort of the anti-Hollywood, underneath all the bluster people really do root for him because he is sort of emblematic of the Hollywood of yesteryear, the big, burly guy who steps on a lot of toes, who does it his own way. It harks back to the reasons many of us got into this business.”

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
12. It was pretty much over before this came out
Sat Oct 7, 2017, 03:55 PM
Oct 2017

Weinstein Company had not had a big hit for a while, because younger independent production companies such as A24 were taking over the limelight. Harvey had become the past.

Indeed, the only reason we are hearing (or rather reading) about this now (it was the biggest unspoken secret around) is BECAUSE Weinstein was on the wane. The New York Times and other entertainment/media outlets no longer had to fear Harvey threatening to pull all his big-bucks advertising: he hadn't been advertising for several years already. The actresses involved no longer had to fear losing Harvey's magic blessing on their careers; there were plenty of hot new producers to rely on.

Money and power talk: as long as Weinstein was riding high, he could pay off his accusers in private, and the media (although they knew) was silent. Lose your power, and you're fair game. This is what happened to Cosby: as soon as he was a has-been it all came out. It will happen to Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People asking "is Harvey ...