Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 11:39 AM Oct 2017

No one supports the Las Vegas shooter however...

...when terror was raining down on hundreds of thousands in Bahgdad, and while mothers and their children were being slaughtered, poll after poll revealed up to 75% supported W's illegal invasion and mass murder.

We live in strange times.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No one supports the Las Vegas shooter however... (Original Post) SHRED Oct 2017 OP
Boy that's a complicated one better Oct 2017 #1
I feel dread SHRED Oct 2017 #2
I absolutely see your point, but look at it like this: Orrex Oct 2017 #3
you're not helping by conflating the two. maxsolomon Oct 2017 #4
Killing people by dropping bombs on them raccoon Oct 2017 #5

better

(884 posts)
1. Boy that's a complicated one
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 12:24 PM
Oct 2017

It's difficult to make a reasonable comparison here, because there is a very important difference between supporting a mass murderer who went out with the intent to kill or injure hundreds of innocent civilians and supporting troops who go out to fight a determined enemy that hides amid countless innocent civilians.

Personally, I draw a very stark line between supporting our troops, who are obligated to fight whatever wars we allow our elected representatives to call upon them to fight, and supporting those wars.

That's probably a distinction at significant play in those polling numbers.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
3. I absolutely see your point, but look at it like this:
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 01:16 PM
Oct 2017

When you hear about a person getting run over by a train on the other side of the country, do you mourn with the same profound sorrow as if your best friend had been run over?

If you're like all of the other human beings who are now or have ever been on the planet, you will of course feel the "closer" death more intensely. That is the nature of the human animal.

In general terms, we identify more closely with the hundreds of Americans killed or wounded in Vegas than we do with the 100,000 fire-bombed in Fallujah, because of the lesser physical distance and the closer cultural kinship. This doesn't make you shallow or callous or heartless; it makes you human.

Having said this, it is of course possible to mourn the deaths of the civilians murdered in Fallujah as part of W's illegal war of choice, but it's simply not reasonable to expect people to feel all deaths as deeply.

Now, if people revel in those civilian deaths, or if they blithely dismiss them as "part of war," then those people are sick assholes who should be called out for their cruel disregard for human life.


But we can't require anyone to mourn all deaths equally.

maxsolomon

(33,318 posts)
4. you're not helping by conflating the two.
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 01:43 PM
Oct 2017

"I'm guilty of murder of
Innocent men, innocent women, innocent children
Thousands of them
My planes, my guns, my money, my soul
My blood on my hands
It's all my fault
I must not think bad thoughts"
-X

raccoon

(31,110 posts)
5. Killing people by dropping bombs on them
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 02:41 PM
Oct 2017

Killing people by dropping bombs on them isn't nearly as bad as shooting them or otherwise killing them face-to-face.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No one supports the Las V...