General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHampton University poll: Gillespie ahead 8 pts in va governors race
With 27% undecided
http://news.hamptonu.edu/release/Nationally-Recognized-Hampton-University-Poll-Places-Gillespie-in-Gubernatorial-Lead-in-Virginia
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Racism sells!
hibbing
(10,598 posts)Another confederate statue ad, I'm for keeping them up, my opponent wants to take them down. Not too much of a dog whistle, led by the racist currently in the White House.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)I found this on washington free beacon, whichh I thought was an actual fake news site or satire. But the link to the university page took me to the link I shared. It isn't posted in any averages like five thirty eight or rip, which is increasingly leading time to question its authenticity.
brush
(61,033 posts)What does being a historically black college have anything to do with the legitimacy of the poll
brush
(61,033 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The center polled 750 registered voters from a random sampling of 400 landline and 350 cell phones in VA rather than students attending Hampton University.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)We said the same thing when polls showed Trump closing.
Now, I am not convinced they did not plant those so they could have our elections, but...
FBaggins
(28,706 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)It seems like they tend to be outliers quite often
Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)time to take it but plan it now.
America is gone for sure, the question is will we all die also.
And all because...ooops, I am not allowed to say why ....
mfcorey1
(11,134 posts)doc03
(39,086 posts)control of a couple more states they will re-write the Constitution.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)Giving a net change of 0. Still scary as fuck though :/
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)The national narrative will completely change if Gillespie wins. It will equate to 2017 being a successful year for the GOP. Trump will taunt and taunt. Suddenly the low approval ratings mean nothing. Republicans who are hesitant to run in 2018 will sense they can get away with it, if not thrive. It will lead to even more outrageous candidates successfully wooed by Bannon.
I don't believe in this poll margin, or the ones indicating Northam has a big lead. Logic points to a tight race. Gillespie barely lost to Mark Warner in the 2014 senate race despite Warner owning a 56% approval rating and leading the pre-election polls by 9 points on average. Yet they were still counting the votes days after election day. That's how tight it was. I remember Nate Silver writing a very long column after being surprised at how tight that outcome turned out to be. He said it would have been the largest senate upset in nearly 20 years based on polling.
So if Gillespie owned enough benefit of a doubt 3 years ago against a popular incumbent I don't see hows he's projected to get thumped in an open race against a lesser candidate. Voters typically are more willing to switch parties for governor than in federal races.
Besides, the white and rural trend toward Republicans is very real. Gillespie likely will outperform his 2014 numbers in those rural areas. Coal is a factor in Virginia.
While intelligent voters are outraged at Trump and independents have shifted away from him, the bottom line in these odd-year races is that turnout is comparatively low...probably 40% or less...and those rural angry white voters are more likely to show up than some of our constituencies like young single females, who often can't be bothered to vote in elections like this one.
I still think Northam will win narrowly but obviously an indication like this one is a jolt.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)I wonder if they didn't even give options and went entirely off of name recognition without considering political affiliation
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)It's an outlier and an extreme one at that:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/governor/va/virginia_governor_gillespie_vs_northam-6197.html
It doesn't mean it's wrong . It just means statistically speaking it's more likely it's wrong than right.
I found this nugget:
The Hampton University Center for Public Policy (CPP) actively polled likely voters about the Virginia Senate Race during the 2014 General Election season. After reviewing the final data from a poll conducted days before the Election, the CPP discovered statistical inaccuracies which led to an immediate review of the data and the mode of data collection.
The Center for Public Policy did not release the poll based on dramatically skewed results which showed Democrat Mark Warner, with a double digit lead over Republican Ed Gillespie, despite social and empirical data to the contrary/
...
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/17/the-strange-case-of-a-virginia-university-and-its-polling/
Maybe it's just a flawed poll. I'll go with the average.
4139
(2,008 posts)They had Hillary by 4% in Virginia and she won by 4.9
http://news.hamptonu.edu/release/Hampton-University%27s-Nationally-Recognized-CPP-Poll-Shows-A-Voter-Toggle-between-Clinton-%26amp%3B-Trump-with-Just-Hours-Left-to-Vote
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)I wouldn't play Russian Roulette with those odds.
4139
(2,008 posts)Cant fault their accuracy for a poll never released.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)What is the rationale for releasing one outlier poll and suppressing the other ?
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)But I will look at the average:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/governor/va/virginia_governor_gillespie_vs_northam-6197.html
before I run around with my hair on fire.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Link to tweet
I am 100% confident that the VA Governor's race will be somewhere between Northam +14 and Gillespie +8
Contributing editor, @DKElections. Labor/Dem politico. I write various things
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)I think that is probably a safe bet...
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)HEre's the link to sign up (call from anywhere)
https://www2.democracyforamerica.com/events/dfadialer/2017?akid=10055.2015136.VpygPh&rd=1&refcode=g-dfadialer1025.d-20171025.m-10055.s-36756&t=2
(I can't participate as I'm running a GOTV operation in NJ)
riversedge
(80,810 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)We've got this state wrapped up.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)Warner was up 10 in 2014 and barely squeaked it out
ileus
(15,396 posts)however.com I can pretty much promise a good old ass kicking by a leas 8-10 points.
Even if we have a poor D turnout, there's not enough votes on their side to beat us.
Consider Virginia a mini California now...we can't lose.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)The transformation took some time :/
But obviously I hope you are right, I've just had way too many unpleasant surprises lately. We all have.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,782 posts)how the Northam campaign is doing financially?
OliverQ
(3,363 posts)As far as I'm concerned, this country is so horrible, it's more than likely a Republican will win and we have to do everything possible to stop them.
StevieM
(10,578 posts)completely turned the race on its head.
Second, the predictions that Hillary was on her way to victory were based on polling data, not unbridled optimism. The polls didn't change until after the aforementioned Comey intervention.
Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)I am inclined to say we win by the average of 5 points.
It will be close, regardless of who wins.
RandySF
(84,304 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)27% undecided two weeks out?
Not buying it.
Both sides have internal polling with Norrtham ahead by 5-6%
FBaggins
(28,706 posts)Most polls ask which candidate you're leaning toward if you initially say that you're undecided. This poll lumped all of those people into "don't know".
That's not illegitimate, it's just a different view.
So, for instance, it's possible for both types of polls to be correct. In this case, it would indicate that Gillespie is ahead among those who have absolutely made their minds up, while Northam has a massive lead among those who aren't quite as sure (but who say that they're sure that they'll vote).
This indicates an even stronger-than-normal need for GOTV efforts and a vulnerability to last-minute switches (as apparently happened in the Senate race last year). It also means that if the race were held today we would probably win it... but that there is reason for worry and increased attention on the part of the national party.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)RandySF
(84,304 posts)peggysue2
(12,533 posts)Real Clear Politics has Northam with a 3.9 advantage. It may be close but not all is lost. I also wouldn't categorize RCP as anything close to having a liberal bias.
One poll is just that, one poll. We shall see.
Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)RandySF
(84,304 posts)Id also note that Hampton Us pre-primary poll was wildly off, showing Tom Perriello up 6 points on Ralph Northam on the Democratic side and Ed Gillespie up 17 points on Corey Stewart (with Frank Wagner actually a point ahead of Stewart!) on the Republican side. Not even close.
http://bluevirginia.us/2017/10/and-now-time-for-the-wild-outlier-poll-that-makes-absolutely-no-sense