Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Maraya1969

(22,462 posts)
Sat Oct 28, 2017, 07:05 PM Oct 2017

Why aren't the public figures trying to head the Trump investigation in another direction

not guilty of obstruction of justice?

Serious question that I may have asked before.

Does it have to be directed at the actual law enforcement to be obstruction?

What about Sean Hannity giving out bullshit information in an attempt to divert millions of people away from the truth that Meuller is actually investigating members of the Trump campaign and cabinet? (What about fucking Devin Nunes and the tricks he has played?)

And Sarah Sanders - She has to know she is lying and trying to divert reporters and the public away from the truth.

What if a family member of mine murdered someone and I started a rumor that the murder was done by someone else and provided fake information about it, in an attempt to change the direction of the investigation?

Is that obstruction or not? I'm asking seriously because everytime I see one of them do something like this I shake my head and wonder how they are allowed to get away with it.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why aren't the public figures trying to head the Trump investigation in another direction (Original Post) Maraya1969 Oct 2017 OP
i don't think public whining actually "obstructs" an investigation, in and of itself. unblock Oct 2017 #1
So it is 1st amendment that rules. It seems so unfair though. They are all so criminal! Maraya1969 Oct 2017 #3
They think they can create their own reality. N/t FSogol Oct 2017 #2
Obstruction of Justice... PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #4
Thanks Maraya1969 Oct 2017 #6
I do not think Hannity is guilty of obstruction and probably not Sanders, either. Nunes might be. LonePirate Oct 2017 #5
With all of the rest MyOwnPeace Oct 2017 #7
Yea, how is he going to explain the GOP vote to impeach 45 Maraya1969 Oct 2017 #8

unblock

(52,118 posts)
1. i don't think public whining actually "obstructs" an investigation, in and of itself.
Sat Oct 28, 2017, 07:12 PM
Oct 2017

building public support for something like firing a special prosecutor is legally meaningless.
actually firing a special prosecutor, that's something else entirely.

on the other hand, there's certainly an expected protocol in washington, and talking about an ongoing investigation, particularly criticizing prosecutors, is usually a big no-no. not illegal, just a breach or propriety.

put another way, if hillary were being investigated and she said half the crap republicans are saying, they'd be impeaching her. well, they'd be impeaching her anyway just for being a democrat, and especially a woman, but that's another story....

seriously, imagine hillary as president, saying a special prosecutor investigating her should be fired.
there's no way the right-wing and the media wouldn't go ballistic.

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
5. I do not think Hannity is guilty of obstruction and probably not Sanders, either. Nunes might be.
Sat Oct 28, 2017, 07:17 PM
Oct 2017

Nunes actually had access to the people, information and evidence central to the investigation. His actions, be they publicly known or not, may be of interest to Mueller.

MyOwnPeace

(16,917 posts)
7. With all of the rest
Sat Oct 28, 2017, 08:54 PM
Oct 2017

of the issues and people involved with them, ONE thing I'm SO hoping for is that this all comes crashing down BIG TIME on IQ45 and his band of thieves.

And with that happening, SEAN F**KING HANNITY is exposed as the crazy piece of bloviating pond scum that he truly is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why aren't the public fig...