General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is terrible tax plan for middle level managers
There are those of us who are hard working reliable mid-level managers .. But not quite superstars.. We stuck in middle.. And hung out to dry..
We are going to get fucked.. And there won't be anyone to help us. If you don't itemize your returns - I am sure you are quite happy with the doubling of std. deduction. If you earn mainly through an llc or a corporation.. You are going to be making out like a bandit.
Those of us working 50-60 weeks, killing ourselves for the next promotion and be able to pay our mortgages.. And the super high property taxes (not uncommon to pay 25000 in my town) so that our kids can go to good schools.
For all my troubles - the following things are probably gone: state and local tax deduction, mortgage interest deduction and tax deferred 401 contributions.
I am sure there will be many on DU who don't care much for any of the above.. But just because it doesn't affect you does not mean that it is not a punch to the gut for someone.
I am all for shared burden.. But in this case Republicans are stealing from the educated upper middle class (who mostly vote Democratic) and giving it to the filthy rich.
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)We'll lose 35k in SALT deductions. Plus, our marginal tax rate is 43%, so the reduction of the 401k would be a HUGE blow to our ability to save. I'm middle management and wife is a physician who works about 60 hours a week... so we're pretty much in the same boat as you. It sucks. Most here at DU don't really care because it affects those making 150-350k.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)I really shouldn't have said "most". "Some" on DU don't seem to care about the upper middle class, but we are just hard working democratic supporters too.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)I Imagine if DU isn't against this.. This will probably pass with bipartisan majority.
Johonny
(26,179 posts)My fear is: The state GOP will use this as a driver to demand lower state taxes, but that only lowers the amount of government money available to use within the state. Making 150K in California with a new house and child. I'll be crushed bigly by this and then hit again when the property values plummet like we know it will without the SALT and mortgage.
This is the I'll never vote GOP again, tax plan. It will crush my family finances.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)I am hoping home builders assn, realtors and money managers like fidelity / prudential oppose this big time.
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)Dana Rohrbacher (R -puke) the rep of my gerrymandered shit ass district... he'll be gone if he votes for this shit.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)under budget reconciliation only 1.5T is allowed, they need to find 4T, SALT gives them 1.8T, partial 401k who knows how much... then there is talk about raising other taxes that maynot hit upper middle class.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)Enough to counter Republicans voting against the bill.
Only hope is that Democrats vote lock step against the bill and are joined by blue state Republicans.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)There are millions of affluent suburban professional people that are reliable voters, who don't give a rat's ass about either the Republican or Democratic social agenda, but usually vote R because they think it's good for their pocketbook. And these people are financially literate, many with accountants (or ARE accountants). They'll see their taxes raised by a GOP Congress preaching "tax reform," and they're not going to buy whatever chum Fox is throwing out.
And those suburban districts are exactly the sort of places where their current gerrymandered strategy could fall on its face. Not to mention, it could cripple them at the state and local level.
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)I can't possibly see how blue state republicans can vote for this. Median home price in my district is probably $1M, and this will have a negative impact on housing prices.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)Deductions are untouched.
The bill is mainly catering to corporations.. 20% tax rate.
However.. More and more jobs are going to be automated leaving fewer people to share the spoils.
Not fair.
Johonny
(26,179 posts)It's still going to hit us hard.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)i am hoping the bill fails the house vote
WillowTree
(5,350 posts)Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #21)
WillowTree This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #11)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)The Dems need to repeat this accurate description over and over and over again. If we continue to use weak language about this assault on the middle class, we will lose again.
roamer65
(37,953 posts)That's when the real fun starts.
SweetieD
(1,673 posts)Student loans out the wazoo. I don't get any breaks except for the student loan deduction which is small. And I hear that is going away or will be further reduced.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)My interest went down from 5.6 to 3.75%
SweetieD
(1,673 posts)Refinancing option that works for me. And I will be paying until I die. My student loans are equivalent to a mortgage or greater.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)There is no way out but death. Meanwhile, billionaires like Trump go bankrupt to the tune of millions all the time and just walk away from their obligations time and time again, but people like us can't even get a break.
Response to SweetieD (Reply #16)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)and the children are long gone. If the mortgage deduction and state tax deductions go, we will be in dire straits, especially with the blows to healthcare in this state. We are all in this together Unfortunately, many upper middle/middle class people have been all to willing to step on those further down to gain financial privilege over the past few decades. This parasitic bleeding of those less advantaged is systemic. Forsaking fairness has gotten us to this point. All I can do is try to find like minded candidates to vote for vales of fairness and protection from predation. This is why elections matter. This is why the interests of all groups must be accounted for. This is why promises of ideologues are not helpful.
Bettie
(19,704 posts)in all likelihood.
When my husband (who is the one who likes to look at the numbers) looks it over, it looks pretty bad, or so he tells me.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I bet GOPers cave on state income and property tax limits if enough people are impacted.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-gop-tax-reform-plan-bill-text-details-rate-2017-10
There are other reasons to oppose this bill/proposal, mainly it doesn't increase taxes at upper end.
Response to Hoyt (Reply #26)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Would love to see your calculations.
Response to Hoyt (Reply #31)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)likely make up for most of that with the slightly lower tax rates (you may even end up benefiting a little, not much, by increased standard deduction, of course at cost of losing personal exemption).
Again, the plan is deficient in other ways, but I don't think the cap of $10,000 on property taxes will have any effect on MOST people except in high housing cost states.
Losing the state income tax deduction might have a small increase on those making under $100,000 depending upon your state.
I bet GOPers don't repeal the state income tax deduction (they'll call that their big compromise) -- even red states will have a hard time explaining support of that.
As to your last question -- I think you have to put what you whine about into perspective. Like I've said before. I'd gladly have my income tax increase from the present rate to $5 Million next year. That would mean I made a bunch of money.
Response to Hoyt (Reply #39)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Johnny2X2X
(24,209 posts)Doubling the standard deductions will off set the harm to the poor. The working poor will see the 1st $12K of their income as not taxable for singles, The first $24K is not taxable for married couples.
For my wife and I who have no children and make ~$90K a year, are home owners, and save for retirement vigorously, this plan helps us slightly in my estimation, but it's nothing that will change our lifestyle at all. So basically, after the standard deduction we'll be down to $66K in taxable income and that's before we take some of the other deductions.
This blows a hole in the deficit and is a massive giveaway to the rich. They throw the poor and working class a couple bones to placate them, but this is a raiding of the treasury.
Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #27)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Johnny2X2X
(24,209 posts)The Republicans want only the poor and the working class to pay taxes, if they could they'd have a tax plan where anyone making over $250K a year pays zero in taxes and anyone making less than $100K a year pays 90%. That's their dream.
So this plan will leave the poor a little better off, considering who proposed it, that's good.
Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #32)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)A family of four will be slightly worse off
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the personal exemption + standard deduction. You are getting a little extra, but not that much.
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)next year and will benefit from tax cuts for the rich.
maryellen99
(3,798 posts)Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)or I wish "they" understood the difference between mean and median .
The median like more likely to be $23 or $ 96 or someother amount they can scratch their ass with.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)There may not even be a tax plan.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)I've move from 25% bracket to 12% bracket. This would help me probably by a few thousand less in taxes.
Le Gaucher
(1,547 posts)I am from NJ