General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeneral Wesley Clark for 2020.
Yes yes, I know it's early, and focus does need to be on changing the house (and hopefully even if a long-shot the Senate) right now. I am most certainly up and involved with that as well.
However, I'm trying to kick off a Draft Wes Clark for president campaign. Hopefully if we can get a grass-roots swelling going, he'll consider the run again. There's potential candidates already being discussed, but honestly I can't think of a single Democratic Party leadership person that could so handily and hands down smash any Trump/Pence or any other Republican running than this man. They wouldn't stand a chance!
I've contacted the general at his Facebook page to let him know:
https://www.facebook.com/generalclark/
I've also created a Draft Wes Clark page:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1605332829549221/
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
shraby
(21,946 posts)Something about him just doesn't ring true. Can't put my finger on it, but I really don't trust him.
Bucky
(54,261 posts)I worked my ass off for him in 2004.
But now, he's just not the right candidate for the future.
onenote
(43,246 posts)maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)New blood.
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)Kamala Harris/Jon Tester
Tester's old and so so white, but he'd bleed off a portion of the armed white man vote with his Montana Crew Cut bona fides.
Response to maxsolomon (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)"welcome to DU", Leon.
you can do better than that, comrade.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)than any white man in the history of the United States!
I think a qualified, experienced black woman could do very well, indeed!!!
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,679 posts)Im sure there are some puritans who will ding tester for one reason or another but I think hes done a good job and is a decent human being. And of course Im over the moon with Harris.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Read some local rumors about her on another site. If it ever gets out it will sink her. Especially with older women, professional women and religious women.
maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)she'll do OK with them?
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Apparently the Willie Brown thing wasn't the only affair. Another married attorney was rumored to be involved with her. We won't be able to play this off as a one-off of two people in love when it happened twice. And we don't need a line of married women going on NBC News accusing the Democratic nominee of wrecking their marriages. It just won't play, especially if Brown used his position to help her with her career.
This needs to be heavily vetted before she even thinks of running.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,266 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,729 posts)Cosmocat
(14,630 posts)was really on board, but yeah, no wind ...
I was a big Joe Sestak guy, too, but hard to get traction for these high ranking dem military guys.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,729 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,227 posts)who isn't scarred from the inner party battles.
maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)Clark is OLDER THAN TRUMP.
Yes, I'm DU's resident Ageist. However, I would settle for someone under 60.
comradebillyboy
(10,227 posts)and think the party needs a youth movement. I am willing to make an exception for Pelosi because she is so damned effective.
maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)She knows it's not in the cards. I want her back in the Speaker's Seat.
comradebillyboy
(10,227 posts)She couldn't get elected president.
MyOwnPeace
(16,988 posts)it's Pelosi.
We just can't START a campaign with someone with such strong negatives.
Response to comradebillyboy (Reply #12)
Name removed Message auto-removed
maxsolomon
(33,620 posts)piling on is not a good look for a <100 post newbie.
lillypaddle
(9,582 posts)He turns 73 next month, but I really like him. I'm 70, but I think we need someone a little younger, like about 5 years at the least.
CountAllVotes
(20,897 posts)Response to CountAllVotes (Reply #34)
comradebillyboy This message was self-deleted by its author.
Docreed2003
(16,954 posts)cally
(21,606 posts)At how much he supported military buildups at the expense of domestic policies. No more war generals in government!!!
Iggo
(47,713 posts)![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
Bucky
(54,261 posts)Oy.
Response to Bucky (Reply #18)
Iggo This message was self-deleted by its author.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)they still admire him.
ecstatic
(32,928 posts)Because the only names floating around are of people 67+ years old. Sorry, but that's too old!
Bucky
(54,261 posts)Agree about the age thing, however. Under 60 is the new Under 50. I repeat this every six months or so, so excuse my repetition, but...
Every time in the last century when the Democrats have taken back the White House, it's been with a young candidate:
Roosevelt - 50 yrs old
Jimmy Carter, 52
John Kennedy, 43
Bill Clinton, 46
Barack Obama, 47
Except for Al Gore, every time we've blown a winnable race, our candidate's been older than Carter was:
Hubert Humphrey, 57
Mike Dukakis, 55
John Kerry, 61
Hillary Clinton, 69 (I know she won the vote by a wide margin, but her electoral "loss" was the result of a strategic miscalculation)
History is pretty clear about this: Barring a global war against fascism, Democrats over the age of 54 can't get elected president.
LenaBaby61
(6,987 posts)Can't be Clooney (Although he IS extremely bright, politically aware, socially conscious), because I have a friend whose sister's a big wig in the thuglican politics out here in California, and my friend tells me that her sister told her that thuglicans hate him so much, that they've already generated a dossier on him "allegedly" containing things about his sex/private life before his marriage to Amal. I hate saying this, but Dems can't be pussy-grabbers and win a presidency. thuglicans would shame them out of it for starters. Plus, with 2 small children/wife, he might not want to run for a political office or get caught up in the mess that's politics.
Now to be clear, my friend told me that her sister told her that there's a dossier on Clooney. The weight you give it's truthfulness However, something tells me that this dossier thing could be true. thuglicans fight and get down and dirty, and it wouldn't be a stretch to believe that there could be this dossier with a bit of truth in it but containing nasty lies, very nasty lies and nasty industrial filthy dirty lies about Clooney if he were to run for a high political office.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)I'm sure there have been some fine ones who would make good presidents, but the creeping militarization has gone far enough. Let's recivilianize our government.
MyOwnPeace
(16,988 posts)While Washington was a good one, and some consider Grant to be a good one, after our current dealings with "generals" I'm thinking it might not be the best time to run with one!
Response to Amimnoch (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hieronymus
(6,039 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,988 posts)Can't you find some 90 year old to put forward? OH, I know!! Dianne Feinstein! She's already 84, highly revered here on DU, and obviously unassailable. because she wins re-elections in California! Plus, she's a woman. How can we possibly go wrong with her at the top of the ticket?
On a slightly more serious note, aside from the fact that Clark is already 72, he was hardly the ideal candidate when last he ran.
Tarc
(10,479 posts)Old, white, male, war hawk.
The "nope" is strong with this one.
Bucky
(54,261 posts)thanks for the reminder that forming opinions without a command of the facts leads to embarrassing statements.
Tarc
(10,479 posts)![](/emoticons/applause.gif)
Bucky
(54,261 posts)You're 2/2 in forming opinions based on zero evidence. I'm just sorry for you it's not an Olympic sport. You've got being wrong down to a science.
Tarc
(10,479 posts)![](/emoticons/popcorn.gif)
Crunchy Frog
(26,752 posts)Not about to go there again.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark#Pristina_International_Airport_incident
The British 2nd in Command speaks
Link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1561897/General-Sir-Mike-Jackson-speaks-out.html
And someone else who was there
Link: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/how-james-blunt-saved-us-from-world-war-3-2134203.html
Clark is NOT someone I want as a Commander in Chief
world wide wally
(21,762 posts)LonePirate
(13,499 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I say that as a fan of his. Not a fan of everything about him but I appreciate his support for our side, sometimes even leadership.
Crunchy Frog
(26,752 posts)and would have supported him for '08, but the possibility of him realistically having a shot at the presidency has been and gone.
We need to focus on new blood.
Cosmocat
(14,630 posts)nm
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)He would be an unbeatable candidate. As well as a strong liberal.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Forget it.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Who turned back the clock to 2004?