General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonna Brazile called the Vermont Senator w/her "findings" but he was lowkey
She describes a phone call where she told Sanders of her findings but he sounded lowkey.
Which she took as him being magnanimous.
She called Bernie Sanders to tell him about all this, but first I lit a candle in my living room and put on some gospel music. I wanted to center myself for what I knew would be an emotional phone call. (In fact, it turned out not to be an emotional call. Apparently Bernie didnt care much.)
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/11/donna-brazile-and-the-latest-great-hillary-scandal/
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)but now we know better so what looks magnanimous is something else. A mistery.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)One would think that he would vent and ask questions or be surprised or upset
The whole thing is weird with the candle and gospel music, like so self serving
I don't know much about DB, but I get the impression she is not a brilliant scholar type
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)The whole thing about candles & gospel music sounds fine to me.
Everyone has ways to brace themselves for what they believe would be an uncomfortable moment.
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)just the the one article I probably read about it knew back in 2015, and so did Sanders back in 2015.
And it stretches credulity past breaking to imagine that even a temporary chairman of the DNC, her own salary probably paid with money raised by Hillary to prop up a DNC badly in debt, didn't know perfectly well long before she accepted the honor of that position.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)Read the quote "she says" she said to him about finding the cancer
People don't talk like that on the phone or in person "Good evening Dave, we found your dead puppy, don't worry looks as if he didnt suffer"
Either she can't write, cant think, or is painting a self portrait
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)We have to agree to disagree.
I hate what she did but I do not hate her.
TheBlackAdder
(28,189 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And understood them.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)bait him. Maybe Donna was addled a bit what with all the scented candle fumes, lol
---------
Feel like Howard Dean's tweet needs to be in every Donna Brazile thread from here on out.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
"Turns out the memo Donna spoke about applied only to the general election. If so then this memo is standard operating procedure for 15 years"
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)Warren's too.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)The damage is done.
Hillary is our modern-day witch, and too many - including many who deny it - just love to hang her over and over on no evidence.
They have been at it for 30 years.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Perhaps they knew they had limited time before the factchecking started?
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)about the standard procedures in the DNC. You would think Donna Brazile would know too, but I'll give her the benefit of the doubt and say apparently she doesn't. The alternative is that she DOES know and wrote what she did anyway.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I dont think we can discredit some of the material and then assume she is telling the truth in other areas.
Phoenix61
(17,003 posts)Because Bernie is well known for not speaking up. Seriously?!? If Bernie thought he had been screwed he wouldn't have kept quiet about it.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)He knows the truth, why isn't he setting the record straight? He damn well knows that too many will not believe it coming from anyone connected to the Hillary campaign, so why isn't he speaking up?
The Democratic Party, which he ostensibly supports, and in which he is a leader of outreach is being attacked, and he seems quite fine with it. Why? Doesn't he see how this is hurting our outreach? How can we present the Democratic Party as a sane, viable alternative to the shitshow that is the GOP for new and disaffected voters if we have fucking Donna Brazile and Liz Warren claiming we are rigging elections and put up sick candidates? Why isn't he doing his fucking job?
mucifer
(23,542 posts)laws on his statement. He is trying to get his supporters to focus on what is right. We need to all be fighting against what's happening to the country and all the things we are losing right now and not perseverating on party infighting.
I felt Bernie's statement was great. It made trump look petty.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Is it any wonder he's among today's top active politicians?!
I'm sure Liz Warren remembers the savaging she got from many Sanders supporters the minute she endorsed HRC.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I mean, do you seriously believe a policy wonk like Hillary hadn't thought of and made a policy suggestion already to all the issues raised in the debates? Obviously, Donna sent the questions in order to leak it, so that Hillary would be smeared by the accusation. It is a typical Putin strategy, and Donna either was inspired by him, or got help from his surrogates Manafort and his buddies.
procon
(15,805 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Kahuna7
(2,531 posts)he knew she was blowing smoke. If he thought was she was saying was true he would have given her a 30 minute lecture.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... or describe what she was wearing at that very moment.
~Liz Bureman
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... as well as a certain other Senator who didn't bother to review or confirm the information, and who hasn't bothered to retract and apologize for her accusations and insinuations.
Still, I wonder what would have motivated anyone to simply "let it ride" and not make corrections or issue any warning or advice. It's painfully obvious what the result would be by failing to take action to mitigate the damage.
Oh, wait. Okay. I see.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Warren should have been careful while Sanders should have been more forthcoming.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)If any other person knew (and it seems likely that at least one other person did know) I have to wonder what his/her/their motivation may have been to remain silent and to allow false and inflammatory information to be spread. Who benefits from such a thing?
If we can ascertain the answer to that last question, then we'd be on the correct path to determining the motive of any person who failed to speak out when given the opportunity, thus allowing false information to be spread, and causing damage to the party as well as damaging personal reputations.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)Given where her credibility is right now I wouldn't believe her if her tongue came notarized. That includes her characterization of her call with Bernie. . We've found out her core concept was totally fictional.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)JMO.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)AGONY......
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)That's all this is.
cilla4progress
(24,728 posts)gracious and intelligent. Consistent and authentic. Honest. That is why he drew the incredible support. People can tell. I have followed him for years. I didn't know what to expect when he ran for Prez and he earned my respect and admiration even more.
He no doubt knew he was being used or manipulated in the call. He no doubt saw through it. Bernie does not play politics. He is above it.
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)He's been playing politics for what.... 40 years?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)If he did know he was being "used" and chose to say nothing to correct the mistake... if he didn't challenge her intent or error... if he decided to let-it-ride knowing that there would be fallout that damaged the Democratic Party... then indeed he was "playing politics".
I'm sorry, you can't have it both ways. It's one or the other... not both.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)that time is over now. He needs to speak out and lay this to rest once and for all. Everyone here *knows* that many won't believe anyone connected to or supporting of the Hillary campaign, so he needs to step up and do his fucking job. Why he hasn't already, I don't know, but I can only think of very unflattering reasons for refraining to set the record straight.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... it's disappointing to me, but not at all surprising. And, for obvious reasons, it's safest for me to just leave it at that and not elaborate any further. It's clear that we both understand what we're referring to. No need to go into details.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)"Weaver" thinks that the DNC owes an apology to Bernie.
A "thank you" is in order from Sanders to HRC for keeping the Democratic Party that Sanders needed for his run financially afloat, when Sanders refused to do so.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)What manipulation was going on?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)incident with DB can bring us all together to defeat the REAL common enemy. Wouldn't that be ironic?! Here's hopin!!
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)He understands the threat facing this nation is too great to be bickering over things that we can't change at this point.
In some ways, I think that is what made his candidacy attractive to Democrats. Though he is an acknowledged Independent, he embodies a lot of the traits we would like to see in members that actually call themselves Democrats.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)because what? Because he would like to not "bicker"? He would ruin, perhaps permanently, our chance of getting the country back on track this Tuesday, and next year, because he would like to stay above the fray? Fuck that! He has a job in Democratic Party, as so many here keep reminding us. It's time he fucking did his job, and worked to present the party to new and disaffected voters - and letting this shit show of fake accusations and attacks go on when he could stop it in its tracks is lower than low.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Certainly not the country.
Or the Democrats.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The person that is telling him this?
Why?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)and followed his uplifting message to unify around electing Hillary for President over that Nazi scumbag currently squatting in the White House. We would be wise to follow Bernie's lead in this latest unfortunate episode and move forward, espousing the traits you so eloquently mention.
jalan48
(13,863 posts)face value. He probably was thinking, "What is this woman up to? Isn't she the one that leaked the debate question?"
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)jalan48
(13,863 posts)"Why is she calling me from church?"
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)jalan48
(13,863 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)All Bernie's fault!
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)which becomes clear after you realize that she was wrong.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Ironically, maybe Donna Brazile found a way to bring us all together.
brush
(53,776 posts)the book; was the book itself a last ditch effort for a final big paycheck since her political/pundit career was just about over from the news of her leaking debate questions to Clinton; was she trying to curry favor with the Sanders wing by basically smearing the Clinton/Obama wing?
WTH was she thinking?
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,954 posts)...outside, the sound of thunder threatened to smash my bay window."
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)about her explosive finding of a standard jfa agreement with a memorandum modeled on the one Brazile had negotiated for Gore in 2000, BS was also so concerned about HRC's troubling bout of pneumonia that he had Jeff Weaver call the DNC the day after she fainted to arrange a meeting so he that could personally convey his "get well soon" wishes.
What a guy!
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)lapucelle
(18,252 posts)ever materialized. Hopefully Donna addressed the matter in her book or will at least answer the question during her publicity tour.
Surely the press will be interested in knowing whether Brazile's autobiographic novel is a "tell-all" or a "tell-some" tale.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)given it's only a year before the 2018 mid-terms.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)The timing of the release of the narrative five days before an election is certainly unfortunate. And why is there so much silence from the famous names that the author dropped?
Don't the parties involved realize that elections happen every year?