Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:40 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
Q: Did people in DU know about Russia hacking DEMS emails in May of last year?
This post is from May last year!!!
Sat May 21, 2016, 06:51 PM
Rumor has it the Russians have many of them Can you imagine them doing a public dump of her email, say... October 21st or thereabouts? Anybody who has copies of those has an incredible amount of blackmail power of her. Disqualifying in and of itself.
|
40 replies, 3579 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | OP |
joshcryer | Nov 2017 | #1 | |
northoftheborder | Nov 2017 | #2 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #3 | |
Kingofalldems | Nov 2017 | #4 | |
pnwmom | Nov 2017 | #5 | |
Eliot Rosewater | Nov 2017 | #7 | |
Kingofalldems | Nov 2017 | #6 | |
Eliot Rosewater | Nov 2017 | #9 | |
Denzil_DC | Nov 2017 | #13 | |
wishstar | Nov 2017 | #8 | |
Kingofalldems | Nov 2017 | #10 | |
HipChick | Nov 2017 | #11 | |
Kingofalldems | Nov 2017 | #12 | |
Adsos Letter | Nov 2017 | #17 | |
pnwmom | Nov 2017 | #14 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #16 | |
Adsos Letter | Nov 2017 | #18 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #21 | |
Adsos Letter | Nov 2017 | #22 | |
R B Garr | Nov 2017 | #23 | |
brush | Nov 2017 | #28 | |
R B Garr | Nov 2017 | #35 | |
pnwmom | Nov 2017 | #25 | |
Adsos Letter | Nov 2017 | #26 | |
pnwmom | Nov 2017 | #27 | |
Kirk Lover | Nov 2017 | #36 | |
hedda_foil | Nov 2017 | #37 | |
Adsos Letter | Nov 2017 | #38 | |
R B Garr | Nov 2017 | #24 | |
boston bean | Nov 2017 | #31 | |
pnwmom | Nov 2017 | #33 | |
boston bean | Nov 2017 | #34 | |
Hekate | Nov 2017 | #39 | |
pnwmom | Nov 2017 | #40 | |
crosinski | Nov 2017 | #15 | |
wishstar | Nov 2017 | #32 | |
Gabi Hayes | Nov 2017 | #19 | |
Madam45for2923 | Nov 2017 | #20 | |
oasis | Nov 2017 | #29 | |
boston bean | Nov 2017 | #30 |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:44 PM
joshcryer (62,185 posts)
1. You've done your research.
Fascinating that a lot of those posts originate in a certain subforum here.
But hardly surprising. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:45 PM
northoftheborder (7,490 posts)
2. who is the "her" to which you refer?
Response to northoftheborder (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:46 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
3. Not my post. Person was referring to HRC
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #3)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:48 PM
Kingofalldems (37,188 posts)
4. Looks like that person is not a friend to Democrats.
Did I read it wrong?
|
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #4)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:51 PM
pnwmom (107,962 posts)
5. That appears to have been a threat aimed at Hillary -- saying she was disqualified. n/t
Response to pnwmom (Reply #5)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:55 PM
Eliot Rosewater (30,460 posts)
7. Anti Hillary Clinton rhetoric on DU ?
Nah , can’t be
Sarcasm |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #3)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:53 PM
Kingofalldems (37,188 posts)
6. Is the poster still here?
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #6)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:56 PM
Eliot Rosewater (30,460 posts)
9. I honestly dont know but willing to bet yes
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #6)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 07:09 PM
Denzil_DC (6,618 posts)
13. No.
PPRed on or after May 24, 2016.
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:56 PM
wishstar (5,094 posts)
8. This was a false rumor widely spread, that a Russian hacker accessed her private email server
But this was proven false, as no evidence has ever been found that any of her emails from her personal server were ever hacked. Point of false rumor was to insinuate her use of private server had compromised national security. Russia and right-wingers and anti-Clinton left wingers all spread this fake rumor, and continued spreading fake rumors through the primary season and into general campaign.
There is much confusion about this false rumor about Hillary's email which was never hacked, with the real hacking of DNC and Podesta's email that had occurred in spring 2016 but not released until summer/fall 2016 by Wikileaks. |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:59 PM
Kingofalldems (37,188 posts)
10. Upon further thought --it looks to me like that post
could have come from Trump headquarters or one of his Russians.
|
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #10)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 07:00 PM
HipChick (25,470 posts)
11. Russian Troll/Bot work?
Response to HipChick (Reply #11)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 07:06 PM
Kingofalldems (37,188 posts)
12. Yes. Or one of the Trump brood.
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #12)
Adsos Letter This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 07:09 PM
pnwmom (107,962 posts)
14. I found that thread by googling the excerpt. It is full of Hillary haters
who were gleefully pronouncing her guilty of felonies, because she had a handful of what were thought to have been classified emails on her private emails. (Containing those articles from European media that Blumenthal sent her.)
They were believing a certain DUer who was oh-so-confidently insisting that her "intent" didn't matter at all -- even though the law clearly makes intent the key factor, and the FBI, of course, decided a month later NOT to charge her with anything because there was no intent. When a new DUer posted the actual law, with the language about intent, she was informed that she only had 45 posts and that her opinion wasn't nearly as important as the Hlllary-hater who had ignored the law, but posted pages and pages of obfuscation that looked very important. It's discouraging to see that DUers were still posting this Trump-assisting crap after Bernie had no mathematical chance to win the election. I wonder how many of the people in that thread have deserted for JPR or for parts unknown. But as to your question -- yes, that is very curious. How would a DUer have heard that a Russian could have her emails way back in May 2016? |
Response to pnwmom (Reply #14)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 07:20 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
16. Exactly! So not curious for only me.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #14)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 10:57 PM
Adsos Letter (19,459 posts)
18. Seventy-seven DUer's recced that thread.
All but sixteen have been PPR'd, refused to agree to terms of service, or stopped posting sometime last year.
16 out of 77. |
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #18)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 12:21 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
21. Woah, why so many? hmmm.
Response to Madam45for2923 (Reply #21)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 02:02 PM
Adsos Letter (19,459 posts)
22. Your guess is as good as mine.
And probably better.
|
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #18)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 02:23 PM
R B Garr (16,648 posts)
23. Wow, 16 out of 77!
That’s some propaganda machine right there!
Wow. ![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #23)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 03:35 PM
brush (47,699 posts)
28. Better phrased as 61 out of 77.
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #18)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 03:19 PM
pnwmom (107,962 posts)
25. Wow. I was wondering. Thanks for doing the math. n/t
Response to pnwmom (Reply #25)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 03:21 PM
Adsos Letter (19,459 posts)
26. It kept me out of trouble until my wife got home.
No small feat.
|
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #18)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 06:53 PM
Kirk Lover (3,608 posts)
36. People also get banned at the drop of a hat...people who are not trolls or jpr types either.
Just sayin'.
|
Response to Adsos Letter (Reply #18)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 07:33 PM
hedda_foil (16,152 posts)
37. How do you find out who's been PPR'd?
I have a huge ignore list and I'd like to cut it down.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Reply #37)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 08:26 PM
Adsos Letter (19,459 posts)
38. Click on their Profile tab.
Under Statistics and Information; the first entry will list their status: active, flagged for review, or posting privileges revoked. If you have the time or inclination you can drop to the bottom of that section to see the date of their last post; click on that, and you can read their last post.
As I said to pnwmom, I was filling time, trying to stay out of trouble until my wife got home. |
Response to pnwmom (Reply #14)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 02:25 PM
R B Garr (16,648 posts)
24. Very interesting! Thanks for the research.
This thread brings back memories. Now we have Trump.
![]() |
Response to pnwmom (Reply #14)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 05:06 PM
boston bean (35,448 posts)
31. Can u send me the link to the old thread. I can't locate it.
Response to boston bean (Reply #31)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 05:12 PM
pnwmom (107,962 posts)
33. Yes, I'll send it to you. n/t
Response to pnwmom (Reply #33)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 05:32 PM
boston bean (35,448 posts)
34. Thanks much! Very interesting.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #33)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 10:34 PM
Hekate (83,988 posts)
39. May I also have the link?
Thanks.
![]() |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 07:14 PM
crosinski (373 posts)
15. My own unwanted guess is that the Russians used the idea of Hillary's 'lost' emails ...
to lure Trump and associated assholes into their oil oligarchy and haven for the last days on earth trap, but they didn't have Hillary's emails, they only had the DNC's emails. So ha! the joke's on you, you stupid trumpsky and associated assholes!
Am I right? Am I wrong? Am I lost in my own little world? Have I had too much wine? Perhaps! Still, I could be right. But probably not. |
Response to crosinski (Reply #15)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 05:08 PM
wishstar (5,094 posts)
32. Ding Ding Ding, You are absolutely right
This was a two-fold operation- spread false rumor of Russian hacking into Hillary's private server to make it seem that she had compromised national security- hurting her popularity, while at same time being able to lure the Trump gang into thinking Russians really had her emails in order to get Trumpsters to promise concessions to Russia in return for her emails and Russian help in campaign
|
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 11:05 PM
Gabi Hayes (28,795 posts)
19. Veeree eeenteresting!
Response to Gabi Hayes (Reply #19)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 12:21 PM
Madam45for2923 (7,178 posts)
20. Yeah, I'd say...
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 03:41 PM
oasis (48,875 posts)
29. Cockroaches in our cupboard.
![]() |
Response to Madam45for2923 (Original post)
Sat Nov 11, 2017, 04:59 PM
boston bean (35,448 posts)