Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:35 AM
babylonsister (169,615 posts)
GOP strategist Steve Schmidt: Trumps defense of Roy Moore exposes a profound moral rot...GOP strategist Steve Schmidt: Trump’s defense of Roy Moore ‘exposes a profound moral rot in the Republican Party’ Noor Al-Sibai 21 Nov 2017 at 20:49 ET President Donald Trump’s public denial of accusations of sexual misconduct levied against Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore represent a turning point for the party, one GOP strategist said Tuesday evening. “Tragic day for the Republican Party,” Republican strategist Steve Schmidt told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes. “The line is drawn, the die are cast, the forces of decency are against the forces of indecency,” he continued. “This exposes a profound moral rot in the country, in the Republican Party. A great test for the citizens of state of Alabama.” “We’ve reached the hour that George Washington warned us about,” the Republican said. “A political tribalism that’s so corrosive, so corrupting, that it could take otherwise normal, decent people that you’d encounter on any day, and make them defend the indefensible and the profoundly indecent. And it’s a sad moment.” Watch Schmidt eulogize his party below, via MSNBC. https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/gop-strategist-steve-schmidt-trumps-defense-of-roy-moore-exposes-a-profound-moral-rot-in-the-republican-party/
|
43 replies, 6666 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
babylonsister | Nov 2017 | OP |
Vinca | Nov 2017 | #1 | |
LongTomH | Nov 2017 | #14 | |
lagomorph777 | Nov 2017 | #17 | |
L. Coyote | Nov 2017 | #24 | |
titaniumsalute | Nov 2017 | #2 | |
ProfessorGAC | Nov 2017 | #3 | |
OnDoutside | Nov 2017 | #12 | |
dajoki | Nov 2017 | #19 | |
Pope George Ringo II | Nov 2017 | #26 | |
Cosmocat | Nov 2017 | #33 | |
Pope George Ringo II | Nov 2017 | #41 | |
OnDoutside | Nov 2017 | #34 | |
Marcuse | Nov 2017 | #21 | |
ProfessorGAC | Nov 2017 | #22 | |
emulatorloo | Nov 2017 | #36 | |
ProfessorGAC | Nov 2017 | #40 | |
Irish_Dem | Nov 2017 | #27 | |
emulatorloo | Nov 2017 | #37 | |
beachbum bob | Nov 2017 | #4 | |
sarge43 | Nov 2017 | #5 | |
emulatorloo | Nov 2017 | #38 | |
dalton99a | Nov 2017 | #6 | |
Girard442 | Nov 2017 | #7 | |
brush | Nov 2017 | #9 | |
KY_EnviroGuy | Nov 2017 | #10 | |
lagomorph777 | Nov 2017 | #18 | |
JDC | Nov 2017 | #29 | |
Achilleaze | Nov 2017 | #8 | |
ananda | Nov 2017 | #11 | |
oberliner | Nov 2017 | #13 | |
SHRED | Nov 2017 | #20 | |
OnDoutside | Nov 2017 | #15 | |
hibbing | Nov 2017 | #16 | |
L. Coyote | Nov 2017 | #25 | |
infullview | Nov 2017 | #23 | |
emulatorloo | Nov 2017 | #39 | |
JHB | Nov 2017 | #28 | |
JI7 | Nov 2017 | #30 | |
Grammy23 | Nov 2017 | #31 | |
Dark n Stormy Knight | Nov 2017 | #42 | |
GoCubsGo | Nov 2017 | #32 | |
spanone | Nov 2017 | #35 | |
Volaris | Nov 2017 | #43 |
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:37 AM
Vinca (48,551 posts)
1. Last night I heard a commentator refer to it as the "Grand Old Pedophiles."
You'd think the semi-sane of the bunch would want to avoid that particular tag, but they're more like a brainwashed cult.
|
Response to Vinca (Reply #1)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:49 AM
LongTomH (8,636 posts)
14. I prefer 'Ghoulish Old Perverts'............
.........and there aren't that many 'semi-sane' members of the party left!!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to LongTomH (Reply #14)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:50 AM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
17. Greedy Old Perverts
rolls off the tongue for me.
|
Response to Vinca (Reply #1)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:35 AM
L. Coyote (51,127 posts)
24. Here's there baseball cap:
![]() |
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:38 AM
titaniumsalute (4,742 posts)
2. A great read
He is 100% correct as well.
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 08:50 AM
ProfessorGAC (53,966 posts)
3. You Own This Stevie Boy!
Ever heard of Atwater? Ever heard of Rove?
You(!) own this, Mr. Strategist. Now that it's blown up in your face, you want to criticize? No! Way too late for that Stevie. |
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #3)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:43 AM
OnDoutside (19,312 posts)
12. While you are correct in what you say, he has led the fight against Trump. I would
love to see someone on MSNBC put your points to him, not in a nasty way but curious as to how he views all that now ? And specifically does he accept that this has been coming since the time of hatred towards bill Clinton, for beating Bush at least, if not back to 1964 ?
|
Response to OnDoutside (Reply #12)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:05 AM
dajoki (10,653 posts)
19. I have done a lot of thinking...
about where the republic party is now and I also trace it back to 1964, barry goldwater.
|
Response to dajoki (Reply #19)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:47 AM
Pope George Ringo II (1,896 posts)
26. I'll stick up for Goldwater
I think his positions look worse and worse with every passing year, but I can respect the intellectual honesty of his views and I don't really look at him as malicious and evil for its own sake. I'd feel better pointing the finger of blame at the "Southern Strategy" and "Moral Majority" pandering as where things really started to go wrong for them, which really brings us to Nixon and then Reagan.
|
Response to Pope George Ringo II (Reply #26)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:15 PM
Cosmocat (13,985 posts)
33. Yep - that shift in the parties was the beginning of the end
let's be honest.
Until Johnson got his run of civil rights legislation passed, the Democratic Party was a comfy home to southern white folks. That left them vulnerable and Nixon was more than happy to poach them into the GOP. The consolidation of racism/bigotry/homophobia, "moral" authoritarianism and business interests got us the monster we have today with 45 and an endless number of deranged repubican's in congress, state houses and local government. |
Response to Cosmocat (Reply #33)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 04:33 PM
Pope George Ringo II (1,896 posts)
41. Also, as long as we're talking about changes from '64
The frank truth is that in '64 you could very nearly have run Stalin against George Washington and the only important question would have been which one of them had the (D) after his name and JFK's ghost on his side. In much the same way that Bush was on the 2008 GOP ticket in a negative way, the sheer emotional "JFK would want it" element is hard to undervalue as a positive for Johnson. A part of the reason Goldwater got clobbered so spectacularly is due to that fluke of running against a popular President's ghost, rather than anything genuinely systemic in the parties or inherent in the actual candidates. The GOP ignored that unique situation and after their analysis decided a complete re-invention of its brand was in order after that slaughter, and the result worked...for a while...before becoming progressively more disgusting until it became completely unacceptable to any reasonable person.
|
Response to dajoki (Reply #19)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:16 PM
OnDoutside (19,312 posts)
34. Yes I agree with 1964 as the start, but I think they upped the
Wackiness during their attempts to impeach Clinton .... It drove them round the bend that he kept getting the better of them, and then onto Hillary, where they threw out any last vestige of honor and decency out the window. They have so many rwnjs dominating the GOP, I don't see how it can he saved in its current form.
|
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #3)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:14 AM
Marcuse (5,796 posts)
21. The Master And His Minions - 1985
![]() |
Response to Marcuse (Reply #21)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:26 AM
ProfessorGAC (53,966 posts)
22. Where's Chuckie Todd?
He was a little lapdog for that crowd back in the day.
|
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #22)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:48 PM
emulatorloo (38,787 posts)
36. Chuck Todd was 13 years old in 1985
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #36)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 03:08 PM
ProfessorGAC (53,966 posts)
40. I Know
But, he started as an Atwater acolyte. But somehow there is amnesia in the rest of the media about that.
|
Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #3)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:48 AM
Irish_Dem (26,721 posts)
27. I agree totally. Save your outrage Schmidt, you helped make this mess. nt
Response to Irish_Dem (Reply #27)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:48 PM
emulatorloo (38,787 posts)
37. I believe in redemption and atonement nt
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:17 AM
beachbum bob (10,437 posts)
4. really? Republicans haven't cared about that in decades so no biggie
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:26 AM
sarge43 (28,416 posts)
5. Just figure this out, Steve?
Headwaters of denial.
![]() |
Response to sarge43 (Reply #5)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:49 PM
emulatorloo (38,787 posts)
38. He's been saying similar for a long while now.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:32 AM
dalton99a (70,196 posts)
6. I give him credit for calling Moore a pedophile and Pence a titanic fraud and nonstop liar
But yeah, words are cheap
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:47 AM
Girard442 (5,590 posts)
7. A relevant quote from Washington's Farewell Address:
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty. Emphasis added by me. Read full document at: https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=15&page=transcript |
Response to Girard442 (Reply #7)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:56 AM
brush (43,063 posts)
9. Well done. Your emphasis is perfectly placed.
Response to Girard442 (Reply #7)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:26 AM
KY_EnviroGuy (13,865 posts)
10. Thanks. Very current and ominous.
One appropriate phrase for us that caught my eye: "sharpened by the spirit of revenge".
![]() |
Response to Girard442 (Reply #7)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:53 AM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
18. Holy moly Washington must've had a crystal ball.
Or a keenly observant nature.
|
Response to Girard442 (Reply #7)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:54 AM
JDC (9,041 posts)
29. Everytime I read something from our founding fathers
I am amazed at their unbelievably thoughtful insight, eloquence, and clarity of thought.
We now have a pResident that can’t put a sentence together. |
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 09:50 AM
Achilleaze (15,475 posts)
8. k and r
![]() |
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:36 AM
ananda (26,100 posts)
11. It exposes a profound moral rot all right.
In the GOP ...
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:46 AM
oberliner (58,724 posts)
13. Steve Schmidt brought moral rot to the Republican party in the era of Rove/Cheney/Bush
It is bizarre that people on our side are holding him up as some sort of moral voice of clarity.
He is the man who pushed for Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court. He is part of the Rove/Cheney/Bush horror show. |
Response to oberliner (Reply #13)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:12 AM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
20. Steve has done a lot of damage
You are correct.
His words now, while appreciated, ring pretty hollow at this point considering what he's done. |
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:49 AM
OnDoutside (19,312 posts)
15. The question I would have for Steve is, if Jeb Bush had won instead
Of Trump, and the Republicans still tried to bring in the Repeal of the ACA and the tax gift to the rich, what would you say then ?
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:50 AM
hibbing (9,186 posts)
16. "otherwise normal, decent people"
Last edited Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:24 AM - Edit history (1) Who are these otherwise normal, decent people in the leadership of that god awful party? The only tragic day for the Republican party will be when they don't control all three branches of the federal government, the majority of governorships and state legislatures.
Peace |
Response to hibbing (Reply #16)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:36 AM
L. Coyote (51,127 posts)
25. I thought Eisenhower died.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:28 AM
infullview (814 posts)
23. STEVE WHY ARE YOU SO SURPRISED????
The RNC and tRump collude with Russia to steal an election and your surprised when they support a pedophile to maintain power!!??
The republican party is so f*cking low at this point they have to pull their socks down to see daylight. |
Response to infullview (Reply #23)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:52 PM
emulatorloo (38,787 posts)
39. He's been saying stuff like this for at least a year. It's not a surprise to him.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 11:51 AM
JHB (35,436 posts)
28. Is "expose" the right word? Or "makes it impossible to ignore"?...
...as least for Steve.
The rot was there long ago, and the Republicans actively fostered it because it provided their margin of victory. |
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:00 PM
JI7 (86,907 posts)
30. I'm glad schmidt has always been critical of trump and continues to be
He isn't claiming to be a liberal but can agree to the vileness of trump and speaks out against it.
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:12 PM
Grammy23 (5,720 posts)
31. I have no idea exactly why Schmidt turned against his own party.
Maybe it was a “come to Jesus” moment when he realized that a moral degenerate like tRump was going to be the Republican nominee last year. Maybe it was after tRump’s nomination and he saw otherwise decent people flocking to his rallies and declaring their allegiance to such a despicable man/child. But something in him recognized we were headed for a cliff in terms of morality. He looked into that abyss and recoiled in terror. I recall very well Schmidt’s role in the 2008 debacle with McCain/Palin. And I think Schmidt probably got a morality wake up call with the mental gymnastics he had to deal with as Palin revealed her thinking or maybe it was the LACK of it that started his turn. Dealing with that ticket up close and personal probably gave him insight that we will never know about. Whatever the reason or reasons, I will take his words today at face value. He is putting the moral dilemma out on the table and maybe forcing a few dyed in the wool Republicans to confront their own moral values. All the conflicts that tRump brought with him are today being revisited in Alabama. The people of Alabama had a chance to reject tRump in 2016 and didn’t. Maybe Schmidt’s goal is to try to stop the degradation of our country by taking a hard look at what the election of tRump brought and saying forcefully that we can pull back. We can determine that we have gone far enough and we don’t like where we are headed. I am willing to give the man a moment of redemption. He, at least, is willing to confront his party and painfully try to lance the boil growing from within its body. I hope he is successful in causing enough people to take a cold, hard look at what they have become and to be willing to say enough. No MOORE! |
Response to Grammy23 (Reply #31)
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 02:57 AM
Dark n Stormy Knight (9,424 posts)
42. Every time I see Schmidt, I think of his role in poisoning our nation w Sarah Palin.
She is pretty much the female Trump, as far as I'm concerned. I'm glad Schmidt is speaking out against the Rs now, but I'm not sure it's sufficient penance.
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 12:50 PM
GoCubsGo (29,445 posts)
32. No, Steve. That rot has been hiding in plain sight for decades.
Eventually, it was going to get so bad that one can't help but notice it, including those who willfully ignored it, such as yourself. Actually, Mr. Schmidt, you are a bit of the mold that helped cause that rot. I'm glad you are finally seeing the light, but I hope you'll eventually realize that you were part of the problem. Granted, not nearly as bad as many others in your party.
|
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 01:20 PM
spanone (131,433 posts)
35. K&R...
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 04:07 AM
Volaris (9,729 posts)
43. Was it moral rot to try and turn Sarah Palin into a vice president, Steve?
Because if you're willing to OWN that as part of the problem as t exists today, then fine, I'll forgive you.
Otherwise, you've found a very good way to pad your own nest (by screeching about how bad things are, without even acknowledging your role in making them this bad). And if it's the latter, you can fuck right off and go die. |