Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

wasupaloopa

(4,516 posts)
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 07:52 AM Nov 2017

The net neutrality issue is similar to other historical events. In the late 1800's near

San Francisco the Central Pacific railroad had a monopoly on freight and passenger transportation. They pushed the wagon freight companies out of business near the bay and those businesses had to move to more remote areas or go out of business.

Once the Central Pacific had a monopoly they began to raise shipping rates. If you were a farmer you paid the higher rates or didn't sell your crop.

To avoid shipping on Central Pacific's trains communities built their own narrow gauge railroads. The narrow gauge railroads disappeared when paved roads and internal combustion engines became more efficient.

I think if net neutrality goes away communities may by pass providers like Comcast with smaller local providers like we use to have.

That is my hope. I am afraid that many people will roll over and pay the higher rates because they can't live without social media.

We will see.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The net neutrality issue is similar to other historical events. In the late 1800's near (Original Post) wasupaloopa Nov 2017 OP
But you already suggest what's going to happen... jberryhill Nov 2017 #1
My mother-in-law will not be able to afford to pay for a package plan for what she now wasupaloopa Nov 2017 #3
Nice little window on the past. Farmers at other times Hortensis Nov 2017 #2
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
1. But you already suggest what's going to happen...
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 08:01 AM
Nov 2017

...and you didn't notice how perceptive you are:

"because they can't live without social media"

That's the basis for pricing plans already popping up in some countries.

It works sort of like this:

------
Full internet $XXX

Bundle: Facebook, YouTube, Twitter $XX

A la Carte: Facebook only $X
------

Different social media apps or sites can be included in packages, just like cable channels, and/or with "an additional X Mb 'other'".

 

wasupaloopa

(4,516 posts)
3. My mother-in-law will not be able to afford to pay for a package plan for what she now
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 08:14 AM
Nov 2017

gets for free. She doesn't have cable TV for that reason.

Many people on fixed incomes will do without.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. Nice little window on the past. Farmers at other times
Thu Nov 23, 2017, 08:02 AM
Nov 2017

had to resort to violence against alliances of railroads and financiers that were exploiting them into destitution, even deliberately breaking them to take over their land.

Although the immediate egregious effects on freedom of information are more than enough to have us fighting this, even worse over not much time it can (and I believe will) have the same political effect that seizing radio stations still does in underdeveloped nations.

Controlling the media is critical to seizing power and overthrowing governments, and right now the new billionaire and centimillionaire classes already have control of most of our media. Inimical interests among them currently use the internet against us but do not control it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The net neutrality issue ...