Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

quartz007

(1,216 posts)
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:31 PM Nov 2017

Sanders Likely to Face Donald Trump in 2020 Election

The 2020 presidential election is Senator Bernie Sanders’ race to lose, according to a new survey of more than a dozen top Democratic strategists.

The survey, conducted by the Hill, reveals a Democratic field crowded with old faces. At a time when the party could use some fresh blood, most contenders for commander-in-chief have been around for decades. Sanders, who will be 79 years old in 2020, currently leads the pack.

“His people have never gone away,” Democratic strategist Brad Bannon told The Hill. “And he has a loyal core following out there that will be with him come hell or high water.” Sanders is the most popular politician in America, with an approval rating of 75 percent, according to a recent Harvard-Harris poll.

read more at:

https://www.newsghana.com.gh/sanders-likely-to-face-donald-trump-in-2020-election/amp/

92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Likely to Face Donald Trump in 2020 Election (Original Post) quartz007 Nov 2017 OP
The Hill loves to divide Dems with bullshit. If he can't continue to hide his tax returns.... bettyellen Nov 2017 #1
Trump as a third party candidate? guillaumeb Nov 2017 #3
I know it's confusing for you, but Sanders also hid his tax returns and is not a member of the two bettyellen Nov 2017 #8
Confusing for someone because Sanders released his returns. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #20
He did not release any FULL returns. Both he and Trump had summaries released- bettyellen Nov 2017 #22
More important in my view are actual progressive positions on issues. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #23
So when your nonsense is debunked, you change the subject. Taxes are THE issue this week.... bettyellen Nov 2017 #25
And your method is revealed. And your beliefs. Welcome to them. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #27
Says the person who pretended Sanders released his returns, LOL... bettyellen Nov 2017 #29
LOL. greatauntoftriplets Nov 2017 #63
Why is Sander's taxes an issue? quartz007 Dec 2017 #72
There's no "evidence" because we know NOTHING about his taxes or who has paid him. This was an bettyellen Dec 2017 #78
I agree, Bernie has never wavered in his support for, and leadership on, issues InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #31
He talks about transparency but has not walked the walk... bettyellen Nov 2017 #67
Transparency is a progressive position. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #35
Who is 100% transparent? An impossible standard. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #68
I never said anyone was one hundred percent transparent. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #69
Isn't transparency one of those issues? lunamagica Nov 2017 #38
No he didn't. George II Nov 2017 #47
No he didn't. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #58
And 2014 was not a full return. But it fooled a lot of people into thinking he'd been bettyellen Nov 2017 #66
No. He only released a 2-page summary of a single return, with none of the supporting pages. pnwmom Nov 2017 #70
Why you worry about Sander's taxes? quartz007 Dec 2017 #73
Because if he runs again he needs to release them -- or else he will have zero standing pnwmom Dec 2017 #74
Agree 100% about DT quartz007 Dec 2017 #75
But Sanders can't pressure DT about this as long as he refuses to share his. n/t pnwmom Dec 2017 #80
We deserve to know about both. Gotta fight the degradation and bring back standards! And norms. bettyellen Dec 2017 #90
Intererting bit of spamming you got going here- write it yourself? bettyellen Dec 2017 #79
100% myself! quartz007 Dec 2017 #87
good call CreekDog May 2018 #92
... Me. Nov 2017 #33
More long term predictions. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #2
Agreed. 2018 is what we should focus on. DanTex Nov 2017 #26
Yes, we need to keep our eye on the "2018 ball"... InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #32
+1000 Alice11111 Nov 2017 #41
Sanders will not get the Democratic nomination standingtall Nov 2017 #4
I concur. quartz007 Nov 2017 #6
+1 kimbutgar Nov 2017 #16
I run in progressive circles and DangerousUrNot Nov 2017 #5
I want him imprisoned dweller Nov 2017 #13
I will vote for that anyway! Alice11111 Nov 2017 #42
The year of the old, white guys. I doubt it! L. Coyote Nov 2017 #7
Nope...if he has a shred of decency..... BoneyardDem Nov 2017 #9
He isn't even a Democrat. LisaL Nov 2017 #10
It's a long road to the 2020 election, such predictions are ludicrous liberal N proud Nov 2017 #11
I can see someone with a lot of Bernie's ideas, but not Bernie. n/t brewens Nov 2017 #12
The ideas ARE the problem for many. eom guillaumeb Nov 2017 #24
You and I have discussed this...I say this with deep unhappiness...this country has lurched right. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #53
Pollling suggests strong support for more progressvie ideas. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #84
Realty suggest otherwise...Look at who is in charge of the states...governorships. The GOP Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #91
Which ideas are a problem? Cobalt Violet Dec 2017 #83
If you are referring to Sanders' ideas, guillaumeb Dec 2017 #85
Newsghana, via Persecondnews, via The Hill, via 11 anonymous "Democratic sources". lapucelle Nov 2017 #14
Nearly A Dozen Me. Nov 2017 #34
Yeah, looks like click bait to me! WhiteTara Nov 2017 #60
I wont be voting for Bernie kimbutgar Nov 2017 #15
I certainly agree with the website credibility! Alice11111 Nov 2017 #44
So, not much point having a Primary? brooklynite Nov 2017 #17
Well. If newsghana says it, it must be so. Squinch Nov 2017 #18
Lol shenmue Nov 2017 #21
7th word, 1st response: "bullshit" nt Stuart G Nov 2017 #19
Welcome to DU . obnoxiousdrunk Nov 2017 #28
He will not be the nominee. Dawson Leery Nov 2017 #30
I'm expecting a Gillebrand, Warren or Harris Takket Nov 2017 #36
It's easy to say nearly three years out. RandySF Nov 2017 #37
i am not sure why ..... this is like the 4th time this has been posted. trueblue2007 Nov 2017 #39
Happens with every divisive thing the Hill publishes... bettyellen Nov 2017 #40
What nonsense caraher Nov 2017 #43
I completely agree. I will vote for the Candidate with the 'D' next to his name. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #50
Too old & I like him. This is probably a Russian or Repub Alice11111 Nov 2017 #45
This is nonsense. murielm99 Nov 2017 #46
Do you realize this "article" is almost two years old? George II Nov 2017 #48
Sen. Sanders will not be the Democratic nominee. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #49
Bernie is popular. We are foolish to dismiss him out of hand. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #51
I dispute...that. I run in very progressive circles and we are preparing for 18. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #57
This is an old article reprinted in the Ghana world news? Really. Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #52
The caption says "Bernie Sanders (left) and Donald Trump were the winners Tuesday in New Hampshire." George II Nov 2017 #54
Dont they have access to western media in Moldova? BannonsLiver Nov 2017 #61
This is true...I don't understand why some are desperate to prove Sen. Sanders is the most popular Demsrule86 Nov 2017 #65
This again? mcar Nov 2017 #55
I hope not heaven05 Nov 2017 #56
He and his wife have too much baggage itsrobert Nov 2017 #59
Typical hill bull crap. 2018 is all that matters right now bronxiteforever Nov 2017 #62
That's mighty optimistic. sofa king Nov 2017 #64
Then we'll be screwed EffieBlack Nov 2017 #71
Incredible Progressive dog Dec 2017 #76
If he runs as a Democrat Lunabell Dec 2017 #77
He should run as a Republican. He has something of a base there. delisen Dec 2017 #82
No Lunabell Dec 2017 #86
Oh NO The fake Poll again! Stop marketing us to death delisen Dec 2017 #81
I'm going out on a limb... Mike Nelson Dec 2017 #88
Stop posting this shit matt819 Dec 2017 #89
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
1. The Hill loves to divide Dems with bullshit. If he can't continue to hide his tax returns....
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:35 PM
Nov 2017

He won't be taken seriously. I think he will run third party anyway. Oh well.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
8. I know it's confusing for you, but Sanders also hid his tax returns and is not a member of the two
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:41 PM
Nov 2017

leading political parties. I'm sure there will be someone running on the angry white male platform, not sure it's going to be either of those two again. I think we've had enough of that nonsense.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
20. Confusing for someone because Sanders released his returns.
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:00 PM
Nov 2017

Perhaps you forgot, or did not know. I am happy to help you on this matter, and there is no reason to thank me.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
22. He did not release any FULL returns. Both he and Trump had summaries released-
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:09 PM
Nov 2017

Likely to confuse people that one years partial return is something actually useful or equivent to normal expectations.

Nope, neither of the two released ANY of their full returns and that's another erosion of norms that is quite troublesome. That's going to be a ballot requirement, for sure.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
23. More important in my view are actual progressive positions on issues.
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:11 PM
Nov 2017

And a history of support for those progressive positions.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
25. So when your nonsense is debunked, you change the subject. Taxes are THE issue this week....
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:15 PM
Nov 2017

And they're a always a top issue for voters. You can bet we will course correct and go for transparency going forward after this shit show.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
29. Says the person who pretended Sanders released his returns, LOL...
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:32 PM
Nov 2017

Anyone who is here as much as you knows better. Method, indeed.

greatauntoftriplets

(175,731 posts)
63. LOL.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 11:13 AM
Nov 2017

I recently submitted an application to a foundation to get a needed medication for an "off-label" use, meaning it is not one recognized by insurers. A required part of that application was a copy of my 2016 tax return. Not a summary. And I won the grant. Had I included a summary rather than the real thing, I'm sure that my application would now be occupying the circular file.

 

quartz007

(1,216 posts)
72. Why is Sander's taxes an issue?
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:19 PM
Dec 2017

What matters to MOST voters is their own personal taxes. What Sanders paid or what he published matters little to me unless Sanders was involved in outright tax fraud, and there is no evidence of that.

At the end of day I will support that candidate who will help further progressive issues and who can win the election.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
78. There's no "evidence" because we know NOTHING about his taxes or who has paid him. This was an
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:33 PM
Dec 2017

Unprecedented lowering of the bar- one among many last year and I just hate it. It helped normalize new lower standards for the office, and in the end it enables sleeze bags like Trump to win. It's not okay just because 'tis someone you like.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
31. I agree, Bernie has never wavered in his support for, and leadership on, issues
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:48 PM
Nov 2017

progressives care about.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
69. I never said anyone was one hundred percent transparent.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 04:06 PM
Nov 2017

And don't get what that has to do with anything you are replying to. We are talking about possible Presidents releasing their full tax returns. No small item. Those who don't are clearly hiding things.

"An impossible standard"

I never outlined such a standard. It's extremely clear you have no argument in this area and are just throwing anything out there.

I have yet to meet a single person who thinks it is acceptable for a Presidential candidate to not release full tax returns going back years. You are laughable acting as if it is a high standard that no one can meet, yet they regularly do.

"Who is 100% transparent? An impossible standard."

Out of those running in the last election, who of the twenty some people were less transparent than Sanders? Yet you attempt to make some absurd claim that someone set the bar at 100% transparent. That is a brilliant retort.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
66. And 2014 was not a full return. But it fooled a lot of people into thinking he'd been
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 02:07 PM
Nov 2017

Fully transparent when the opposite is true.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
70. No. He only released a 2-page summary of a single return, with none of the supporting pages.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 04:12 PM
Nov 2017

That is grossly inadequate.

 

quartz007

(1,216 posts)
73. Why you worry about Sander's taxes?
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:21 PM
Dec 2017

What matters to MOST voters is their own personal taxes. What Sanders paid or what he published matters little to most unless Sanders was involved in outright tax fraud, and there is no evidence of that.

At the end of day I will support that candidate who will help further progressive issues and who can win the election.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
74. Because if he runs again he needs to release them -- or else he will have zero standing
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:23 PM
Dec 2017

to criticize DT for not releasing his.

And we KNOW that DT is corrupt and that's why he refused to release them.

 

quartz007

(1,216 posts)
75. Agree 100% about DT
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:28 PM
Dec 2017

Trump's taxes will tell a heckuva story about his crooked ways and money laundering. Sander's taxes will tell us not much except that he is richer than the average voter.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
90. We deserve to know about both. Gotta fight the degradation and bring back standards! And norms.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 11:46 AM
Dec 2017

I miss Norms.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
92. good call
Tue May 1, 2018, 11:25 PM
May 2018


posted that he was almost 80 elsewhere, posted another time that he paid for a flu shot which i thought Medicare covers 100%.

then trashed the flu shot saying he gets it every year but got the flu last time (but no fever) and won't waste his money on a flu shot again (sure man! )

and at almost 80 had a kid in college to support in 2017. well, maybe he is Clint Eastwood or Larry King or just an average guy who had kids in their late 50's, that's certainly possible, but, in context I...

then asked when the ice caps were supposed to have melted in the Environment and Energy Group.



guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
2. More long term predictions.
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:36 PM
Nov 2017

2018 is the most important race at this point, and turnout and enthusiasm are the biggest factors.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
26. Agreed. 2018 is what we should focus on.
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:19 PM
Nov 2017

Who knows who will run in 2020? To me, by far the most important thing about whoever we run in 2020 is that that person beats Trump. If it's Sanders, and he beats Trump, that's great. If it's someone else who beats Trump, that's great too.

But that's down the road. Right now what we need to do is pick up seats in 2018, and not start fighting about the 2020 primaries.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
32. Yes, we need to keep our eye on the "2018 ball"...
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:51 PM
Nov 2017

but, it will be interesting to see if a 2020 front runner emerges to lead the charge on progressive issues that will be the deciding factor in the 2018 elections.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
41. +1000
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 02:58 AM
Nov 2017

I think this early obsession with 2020 is because we are living a nightmare with Trump. However, SENATE. SENATE. SENATE. Plus, the House and state and local races. Then, we will have a better chance in 2020.

standingtall

(2,785 posts)
4. Sanders will not get the Democratic nomination
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:37 PM
Nov 2017

Democrats should never allow him to run for the parties nomination again period. Only way he runs for President again is as a 3rd party candidate. Of his 75% approval rating how many of those are just republicans who see Sanders as a wedge figure to use against Democrats? There is a reason Trump pretended to be Bernie's best friend.

DangerousUrNot

(431 posts)
5. I run in progressive circles and
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:38 PM
Nov 2017

I’ve heard a lot of “Bernie shouldn’t run”. I would like to see him win. If not Bernie, we have to make sure it’s someone that can olbliterate Trump in the race. It’s not good enough to beat him, I want him to be embarrassed.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
7. The year of the old, white guys. I doubt it!
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:40 PM
Nov 2017

Trump won't be a candidate, for one. Sanders will have been forgotten for another.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
10. He isn't even a Democrat.
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:45 PM
Nov 2017

Didn't he go right back to being an Independent? I think there should be some rule prohibiting someone from participating unless they have been a member of the party for a certain period of time.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
11. It's a long road to the 2020 election, such predictions are ludicrous
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:47 PM
Nov 2017

But first thing at hand are the mid term elections.

We need to focus on kicking out the republicans first!

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
53. You and I have discussed this...I say this with deep unhappiness...this country has lurched right.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:28 AM
Nov 2017

Some of Sen.Sanders ideas will work and some won't in this climate...we need to get what we can and inch left taking the American people with us...hearts and minds my friend.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
84. Pollling suggests strong support for more progressvie ideas.
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:58 PM
Dec 2017

Money politics suggest a more center right approach.

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
91. Realty suggest otherwise...Look at who is in charge of the states...governorships. The GOP
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:28 AM
Dec 2017

Yes. Our idea have always polled well, but people don't vote for them...I don't know why. I wish I did.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
85. If you are referring to Sanders' ideas,
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:59 PM
Dec 2017

the concept of Medicare for all, free college tuition, a more progressive tax system, and others are seen by some Democrats as too much or too far.

lapucelle

(18,246 posts)
14. Newsghana, via Persecondnews, via The Hill, via 11 anonymous "Democratic sources".
Sun Nov 26, 2017, 09:58 PM
Nov 2017

Sounds reliable to me.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
34. Nearly A Dozen
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:17 AM
Nov 2017

Could be 5,6,7 or even less, depending how close you want to get to the actual real number

trueblue2007

(17,205 posts)
39. i am not sure why ..... this is like the 4th time this has been posted.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 01:40 AM
Nov 2017

is there a rule about reposting the same story ..... opinion over and over?

in some of the other repostings, there have been lots of word wars going on.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
43. What nonsense
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 03:01 AM
Nov 2017

He's just the guy who came closest to the last nomination without winning it. He won't run third party for the same reason he didn't in 2016. The same article in 2005 would have tapped Hillary, in 2001 would have tapped somebody other than Kerry...

Let's talk about 2018 first. Stop excessive focus on the top of the ticket, especially this far out (it's important, but not all-important, as the gerrymandered Congress and R-controlled state houses should tell us all).

If Sanders makes it to the general election with a (D) by his name, he has my vote. Ditto for Biden, Harris, Warren, Gillibrand... the list goes on. Doesn't matter today who among them would be my first choice; I'll figure that out once we see who runs and when primary season is upon us. I have my favorites, you probably do too, but we have a lot more important things to do now than this.

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
50. I completely agree. I will vote for the Candidate with the 'D' next to his name.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:23 AM
Nov 2017

I just don't think Sen. Sanders will win a Democratic primary in 20.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
45. Too old & I like him. This is probably a Russian or Repub
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 03:07 AM
Nov 2017

Fake news. They would love for us to fall for this.
I guess Mugabe was 93, but his wife really ran things, like Nancy and Ronald at the end...though Reagan had reasonably competent people in many places.

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
49. Sen. Sanders will not be the Democratic nominee.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:21 AM
Nov 2017

And those who think he will be should prepare for disappointment so we don't have divisions...many great Democrats out there. We will run a great nominee...someone new.

Irish_Dem

(46,914 posts)
51. Bernie is popular. We are foolish to dismiss him out of hand.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:24 AM
Nov 2017

And his message resonates with young people.

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
57. I dispute...that. I run in very progressive circles and we are preparing for 18.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:35 AM
Nov 2017

We are Democrats who generally get out the vote and help raise money...he is no longer that popular even among those who were super supporters before. He has made statements about the Democratic Party that have brought his numbers down with those who vote in primaries...oh sure the Right wing types love him (but would cut off their fingers before voting for him) and the Our Revolution (Democratic party haters) love him. But that won't be enough to win a primary. None of the candidates he backed (Mello, Perriello and Quist) won so I don't see evidence that his message is really taking hold . He is valuable in the Senate....and with Vermont having a GOP governor, Sanders would be replaced with a righty should he resign from the Senate...that can't happen...so this is another reason, he should not run.

George II

(67,782 posts)
54. The caption says "Bernie Sanders (left) and Donald Trump were the winners Tuesday in New Hampshire."
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:30 AM
Nov 2017

And there's a link to an event in Ghana in 2016.

It appears it was edited and updated, but still was written right after the 2016 New Hampshire primary.

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
65. This is true...I don't understand why some are desperate to prove Sen. Sanders is the most popular
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:08 PM
Nov 2017

and will run in 20...He isn't that popular in my opinion with Democratic primary voters, and what makes them think he will win a Democratic primary (assuming he is allowed to run)?

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
56. I hope not
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:35 AM
Nov 2017

Last edited Mon Nov 27, 2017, 02:20 PM - Edit history (1)

fresh new people are needed and I hope they step up...the DEMOCRATIC PARTY must field and create a new image that progressives and liberals can take hold of an defeat the repthugliKKKan hate machine. The wing leader, an Independent, not DEMOCRAT, who people are touting as the candidate to face trump in 20, is NOT the person to lead this Party. I won't be here, so if you of this minor wing who live in a world of fantasy and illusion, field this minor leader of a minor wing of our DEMOCRATIC, not Independent, Party, so be it and let the destruction of our country/democracy continue. I'm in the 25% not impressed with this minor leader of a minor wing of MY PARTY.

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
62. Typical hill bull crap. 2018 is all that matters right now
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 11:05 AM
Nov 2017

That and getting more Congressional subpoena power

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
64. That's mighty optimistic.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 11:22 AM
Nov 2017

Republicans have wheezed along for the better part of this decade on gerrymandering and election theft, and each success is shadier than the last. They have to secure near total-control of every districting legislative body in the country by 2020 so that they can gerrymander the country again, or they're forever gone.

I don't think there is going to be an election in 2020. I won't be entirely surprised if neither Trump nor Sanders are around to not run in that non-election.

This post is so negative I can't be sure if all of my double negatives cancel themselves out. But seriously, if any single one of you looked at this fanciful headline and thought for a minute that it could happen, you're bound to be disappointed by what happens instead. I don't think that Democrats can afford wishful thinking at this point.

 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
71. Then we'll be screwed
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 04:27 PM
Nov 2017

If Hillary Clinton couldn't beat Donald Trump, the guy who couldn't beat her in the primaries would be toast. Trump would eat him alive by August.

Lunabell

(6,078 posts)
86. No
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 09:06 PM
Dec 2017

Those were idiot Bernie bros who hated Hillary. He is everything the Democratic part should be. For the people. By the people. Not for the rich.

delisen

(6,042 posts)
81. Oh NO The fake Poll again! Stop marketing us to death
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 08:45 PM
Dec 2017

with these cheap marketing tips.

The Harris Online Poll BS is pt of Mark Penn's marketing pitch-with Bernie has signed up with them or they are pitching their services.

It's a liars poll and Sanders should denounce it.

Mike Nelson

(9,951 posts)
88. I'm going out on a limb...
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 10:11 PM
Dec 2017

...here, I know, but my prediction is:

Donald Trump won't be the 2020 Republican candidate.

Bernie Sanders won't be the 2020 Democratic candidate.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
89. Stop posting this shit
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 10:14 PM
Dec 2017

This from Ghana via numerous us outlets, and that was sheer speculation.

Just. Stop. It.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanders Likely to Face Do...