Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rgbecker

(4,831 posts)
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 11:59 AM Dec 2017

Does anyone have any thoughts on why Judge recused himself from Flynn Case?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-in-mike-flynns-case-recuses-himself/

Just saw this and I see no one is saying why. Was he concerned about new RW charges that the Mueller investigation is tainted by Trump hating agents? This is troubling for me and I would like to know what's up.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone have any thoughts on why Judge recused himself from Flynn Case? (Original Post) rgbecker Dec 2017 OP
No. the court hasn't given a reason. Now - reality vs. RW underpants Dec 2017 #1
Of Course, Only Republicans Can Legitimately Appoint Judges or Elect Officials dlk Dec 2017 #3
He May Have Been Threatened in Some Way dlk Dec 2017 #2
I am thinking mercuryblues Dec 2017 #4
That's probably the reason marylandblue Dec 2017 #6
Makes sense MaryMagdaline Dec 2017 #7
Because he is FISA court. VermontKevin Dec 2017 #5
I think its this too... Pachamama Dec 2017 #8

underpants

(182,793 posts)
1. No. the court hasn't given a reason. Now - reality vs. RW
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 12:03 PM
Dec 2017

In reality this is how the court should work.

The RW will go off on not just the recusal but how a Clinton appointed Judge now has the case.

dlk

(11,563 posts)
2. He May Have Been Threatened in Some Way
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 12:04 PM
Dec 2017

Trump made a huge stink about Judge Curiel's heritage. Who knows? Given this gang's criminal tendencies, no telling what they did behind the scenes.

mercuryblues

(14,531 posts)
4. I am thinking
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 12:05 PM
Dec 2017

it has something to do with his assignment issuing FISA warrants. can he rule on cases that he has issued warrants for?

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
6. That's probably the reason
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 12:55 PM
Dec 2017

Some of the evidence against Flynn must have been gathered under a FISA warrant he issued. In that case, he might have to rule on the validity of his own decision. That could trigger a recusal. That's how it works when a judge goes to SCOTUS and has to rule on a case he or she already ruled on as a lower judge.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone have any thou...