General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs this right? T can't fire Mueller directly? He has to do it thru someone? Eg, SatNiteMassacre
dhol82
(9,353 posts)Beautiful, aint it?
rzemanfl
(29,557 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)And only for "good cause." Good cause doesn't include, "Mueller is scaring me."
Girard442
(6,070 posts)He could arrest Mueller, fr'instance. Assaulted a police officer or some such thing.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-was-the-saturday-night-massacre
Since the AG, Jeff Sessions, supposedly recused himself from anything Russia-related, the deputy AG, Rostenstein, has to fire Mueller. If he refuses, which he hinted he would, it goes down the line in the Justice Dept.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)n/t
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)He can't just get off Fox, turn to the nearest person, and say 'Fire Mueller.'
Would it be easy to do in recess?
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)The one that says that he has to go through Rosenstein first? That's a regulation, currently, not a law.
Theoretically he could could just say "that's not the regulation anymore" and fire Mueller.
Real world consequences? With a GOP congress? Probably depends on if their tax bill is passed first.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)In which case, here's hopin the Traitor-in-Chief DOES fire Mueller.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)He'd have to order DOJ to go through a rulemaking process under the Administrative Procedures Act. This usually takes a minimum of a few months and includes opportunity for public comment. The rule itself would be subject to judicial review for whether the change was "arbitrary and capricious." Also it would be questionable as to whether a new rule could reverse an appointment made under an old rule.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)There would be a public comment period (theoretically). Judicial review comes down to paragons of judicial scholarship such as Thomas and Gorsuch, so not a lot of faith there.
It wouldnt be instantaneous, but it COULD be done.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)I got a fuckin' citation for all you damned lawyers out there: The Years 2001-2009, Inclusive.
Until you guys can square that with your bullshit law books, which do not apply to the privileged or to Republican politicians, not a damned one of you can guess what's going to happen.
I want every one of you to remember that while this goes down.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)But, I think it is too late now, assuming Trump ever really thought about doing so. He knows that would just intensify investigation.