Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this right? T can't fire Mueller directly? He has to do it thru someone? Eg, SatNiteMassacre (Original Post) bobbieinok Dec 2017 OP
Yup, has to go through Rosenstein dhol82 Dec 2017 #1
Yep. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2017 #2
yup. shanny Dec 2017 #3
Depends how far Trump wants to go. Girard442 Dec 2017 #4
Watergate's Saturday Night Massacre: NastyRiffraff Dec 2017 #5
Theoretically he could change the regulation arbitrarily Nevernose Dec 2017 #6
So to fire M, he has to do it thru someone who is in proper line? bobbieinok Dec 2017 #8
He could theoretically just change the reg Nevernose Dec 2017 #10
I think that would lead to instant impeachment & conviction... InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2017 #12
Actually, he can't arbitrarily change the regulation marylandblue Dec 2017 #13
But it COULD be done Nevernose Dec 2017 #14
But he doesn't have to because there's a Bork down the line somewhere. sofa king Dec 2017 #15
I think he can say you are fired, but wont get away if someone says you cant do that. Hoyt Dec 2017 #7
Can Trump fire Rosenstein & Sessions? quartz007 Dec 2017 #9
He can only fire the Special Counsel for cause. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #11

Girard442

(6,070 posts)
4. Depends how far Trump wants to go.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 11:18 PM
Dec 2017

He could arrest Mueller, fr'instance. Assaulted a police officer or some such thing.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
5. Watergate's Saturday Night Massacre:
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 11:23 PM
Dec 2017
The “massacre” stemmed from an inquiry into the notorious June 1972 break-in at the Watergate complex, in which five Nixon operatives were caught trying to bug the Democratic National Committee headquarters. Archibald Cox, a Harvard law professor and former U.S. solicitor general, was tapped to investigate the incident in May 1973. He soon clashed with the White House over Nixon’s refusal to release over 10 hours of secret Oval Office recordings, some of which implicated the president in the break-in. On October 20, 1973, in an unprecedented show of executive power, Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to fire Cox, but both men refused and resigned their posts in protest. The role of attorney general then fell to Solicitor General Robert Bork, who reluctantly complied with Nixon’s request and dismissed Cox. Less than a half hour later, the White House dispatched FBI agents to close off the offices of the Special Prosecutor, Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General.
http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/what-was-the-saturday-night-massacre


Since the AG, Jeff Sessions, supposedly recused himself from anything Russia-related, the deputy AG, Rostenstein, has to fire Mueller. If he refuses, which he hinted he would, it goes down the line in the Justice Dept.

bobbieinok

(12,858 posts)
8. So to fire M, he has to do it thru someone who is in proper line?
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 11:34 PM
Dec 2017

He can't just get off Fox, turn to the nearest person, and say 'Fire Mueller.'

Would it be easy to do in recess?

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
10. He could theoretically just change the reg
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 11:45 PM
Dec 2017

The one that says that he has to go through Rosenstein first? That's a regulation, currently, not a law.

Theoretically he could could just say "that's not the regulation anymore" and fire Mueller.

Real world consequences? With a GOP congress? Probably depends on if their tax bill is passed first.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
12. I think that would lead to instant impeachment & conviction...
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:15 AM
Dec 2017

In which case, here's hopin the Traitor-in-Chief DOES fire Mueller.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
13. Actually, he can't arbitrarily change the regulation
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:20 AM
Dec 2017

He'd have to order DOJ to go through a rulemaking process under the Administrative Procedures Act. This usually takes a minimum of a few months and includes opportunity for public comment. The rule itself would be subject to judicial review for whether the change was "arbitrary and capricious." Also it would be questionable as to whether a new rule could reverse an appointment made under an old rule.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
14. But it COULD be done
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:12 PM
Dec 2017

There would be a public comment period (theoretically). Judicial review comes down to paragons of judicial scholarship such as Thomas and Gorsuch, so not a lot of faith there.

It wouldn’t be instantaneous, but it COULD be done.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
15. But he doesn't have to because there's a Bork down the line somewhere.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:14 PM
Dec 2017

I got a fuckin' citation for all you damned lawyers out there: The Years 2001-2009, Inclusive.

Until you guys can square that with your bullshit law books, which do not apply to the privileged or to Republican politicians, not a damned one of you can guess what's going to happen.

I want every one of you to remember that while this goes down.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. I think he can say you are fired, but wont get away if someone says you cant do that.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 11:28 PM
Dec 2017

But, I think it is too late now, assuming Trump ever really thought about doing so. He knows that would just intensify investigation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is this right? T can't fi...