Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:12 PM Dec 2017

6 yr old: At no time was I informed that there would be video surveillance of the cookie jar

Kyle Griffin
Trump transition officials plan to ask Mueller to return "many tens of thousands" of transition emails, Axios reports. The transition apparently says it’s willing to provide Mueller only with vetted....

Josh Marshall Retweeted Kyle Griffin
6 yr old: At no time was I informed that there would be video surveillance of the cookie jar.


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
6 yr old: At no time was I informed that there would be video surveillance of the cookie jar (Original Post) jodymarie aimee Dec 2017 OP
i love they they think emails can simply be returned. unblock Dec 2017 #1
That's not quite true. FBaggins Dec 2017 #3
fair point, perhaps i'm too technical on this. unblock Dec 2017 #4
We are talking thousands of emails Egnever Dec 2017 #5
the best part is donnie and the gang whining about their expectation of privacy regarding emails. unblock Dec 2017 #6
Yea the irony here is delicious. Egnever Dec 2017 #7
Except that, from anything I've read, this particular 6-year old WAS informed Ms. Toad Dec 2017 #2

unblock

(52,089 posts)
1. i love they they think emails can simply be returned.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:19 PM
Dec 2017

it goes beyond "uh, you do know i can just make a copy".

in fact, it's impossible to return emails without making a copy.

FBaggins

(26,714 posts)
3. That's not quite true.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:23 PM
Dec 2017

There isn't any evidence that Mueller's team was forwarded thousands of emails.

They may have been provided with electronic copies (perhaps on a flash drive of backup drive), or they may have been provided with paper copies. In either case, they could simply give them back.

Of course, that's not the real news (which is that he has them and says that he received them legally - and this doesn't need to return them).

unblock

(52,089 posts)
4. fair point, perhaps i'm too technical on this.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:30 PM
Dec 2017

to my former techie ear, "emails" can't be "returned" without making another copy.

however, a "printout of emails" or a "flash drive containing emails" could indeed be returned without making any copies.

and i agree, the real question is whether or not they were obtained legally, though that is sounding like donnie and the gang are grasping at straws. *they* are the ones who obtain emails illegally

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
5. We are talking thousands of emails
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:36 PM
Dec 2017

I would imagine this would have been a data dump from the company of all accounts related to the investigation. Much more likely they just copied the data from whatever server held them then sent a drive containing all of them.

I would be very surprised if there was any skulduggery in this. Pretty routine stuff in any investigation these days.

unblock

(52,089 posts)
6. the best part is donnie and the gang whining about their expectation of privacy regarding emails.
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:39 PM
Dec 2017

they openly called for hackers to commit espionage to steal hillary's emails, and they gleefully went through hacked emails from the dnc and used them in their campaign efforts.

but oh, anyone looking at *their* emails, whoa, that's an invasion of privacy!


these people have no shame at all.

Ms. Toad

(33,975 posts)
2. Except that, from anything I've read, this particular 6-year old WAS informed
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 12:22 PM
Dec 2017

of the video surveillance of the cookie jar. (The disclaimer that comes with .gov emails.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»6 yr old: At no time was ...