Rep. Tim Ryan makes it formal: He's gone from 'anti-abortion' to 'pro-choice'
Source: cleveland.com
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Niles-area Democratic Rep. Tim Ryan ran for Congress on an anti-abortion platform in 2002 but gradually lost support from groups that oppose the controversial procedure as his views increasingly diverged from theirs.
Last night - in a gesture that some observers believe might preface a run for higher office - Ryan made official his split with the anti-abortion movement by publishing a column in the Akron Beacon Journal titled "Why I changed my thinking on abortion."
It explained that Ryan considered himself to be "pro-life" after being raised Catholic, but 14 years in political office gave him "a deeper understanding of the complexities and emotions that accompany the difficult decision that women and families make" when deciding whether to end a pregnancy.
"While there are people of good conscience on both sides of this argument, one thing has become abundantly clear to me: the heavy hand of government must not make this decision for women and families," Ryan said in his column.
Read more: http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/01/rep_tim_ryan_makes_it_formal_h.html
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Now, only if Paul Ryan would come to his senses.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)my terrible self!
Disclaimer: Not Catholic, so IDK what they think about the Afterlife. My thoughts about that is I'll wait until then to think about it. And as the saying goes:
'If in having died, I find myself unsatisfied with the other side, I may come back (to complain).'
If there's an internet connection...
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)LoLoL!
The Koch bros provide philosophical proof of the existence of Hell. Because there HAS to be someplace they belong.
Or, they could just rot. #GetLostWeWontMissYouTheSoonerTheBetter
calimary
(81,304 posts)eric cantor never thought it'd happen to him, either. Nor did I. Utterly delicious that he's no longer there. Even though we didn't snatch away his seat, it's still nice that he's so very OUTTA there!
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)John Travolta became super-intelligent and developed clairvoyance and telekinesis.
If Walker attains those powers, it would mean the demise of us all.
Unless of course his super-intelligence turns him into a far-left progressive.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)RancidCrabtree
(24 posts)no senses to come to
forest444
(5,902 posts)has always been to be pro-choice! Why?
Because lawmakers and voters who are pro-choice are also, by necessity, pro-contraception - which is and has always been the only effective and realistic way to reduce the number of abortions. As everyone here knows, all that these medieval, moralistic restrictions on either have ever accomplished is the emergence of an invisible mountain of sub-rosa abortions (and all the hideous gynecological illnesses and injuries that usually follow).
It's hard to believe that in the U.S., in 2015, we still have to explain this to people, isn't it?
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Small Accumulates
(149 posts)a clear voice of reason in the forest
forest444
(5,902 posts)It is what it is, unfortunately.
Cha
(297,275 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Gratuitous rug picture:
niyad
(113,328 posts)ananda
(28,865 posts).. always said that morality should never be legislated.
And I always say that government officials should
NEVER practice medicine.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)Legislating morality, by definition, means imposing your own morals not only on those who do share them, but also--and especially on people who don't subscribe to your idea of morality.
Elmergantry
(884 posts)Seems to me many of our laws are based on some sort of moral judgement.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Unfortunately she is pro-life and that bothers me, but there is nothing I can do about it.
shireen
(8,333 posts)Everyone is pro-life ... we all want a good quality of life for each other.
Abortion opponents should be referred to as "anti-choice." That has quite a sting to it.
Does anyone know the number of pro-choice Republicans in the House and Senate?
niyad
(113,328 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)UnseenUndergrad
(249 posts)And then they'll call you anti-life and more screaming will happen and both sides will slap themselves on the back and cackle in self-satisfied glee.
All the while, we have a progressive movment where reproductive autonomy has become (in many eyes on both sides) a clever and pretty lie to mask an atrocious number of feticides of varying justifiability, themselves a symptom of a society in thrall to Big Everything, Pro-elite republican corporatists playing conservative abortion-opponents for chumps, progressive abortion-skeptics (what few there are) tired of the whackos they have to share a frathouse with, and myself wondering if the lunatics on the right are tapping into something that the national Dems have seemed to have forgotten: the idea that "voting against your own best interests" has more than an economic dimension.
Alright, that's enough venting from me, but somethimes I think that (some) pro-choicers are their own worst enemy, much like many "Pro-Life" (tm) professional activists and politicos.
(HEY, we can just add a trademark symbol at the end! They can't complain as much and we can fit in commentary of various stripes!)
--(gulps as I press post)