Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:52 AM
Jesus Malverde (10,274 posts)
Judge Halts Obama's Immigration OrderThis discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NH Ethylene (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum). Gov. Greg Abbott hailed a federal judge's decision Monday to halt President Obama’s executive action on immigration — a decision that gave the state of Texas an initial victory in its battle against what state leaders call federal overreach. U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen of Brownsville ruled that the Obama administration did not "comply with the Administrative Procedure Act." The Administrative Procedure Act governs the way regulations are made and how much input the public has. Obama's policy seeks to give as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants — including some 1.46 million in Texas — a work permit and temporary relief from deportation. Abbott, the state's former attorney general, filed the lawsuit in December before being sworn in as governor. Texas is part of a 26-state coalition that challenged the executive action, which was announced in November. Read more: http://www.texastribune.org/2015/02/16/executive-action-immigration-ruling/
|
6 replies, 912 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Jesus Malverde | Feb 2015 | OP |
cstanleytech | Feb 2015 | #1 | |
salib | Feb 2015 | #2 | |
kelliekat44 | Feb 2015 | #3 | |
Hugin | Feb 2015 | #4 | |
Hugin | Feb 2015 | #5 | |
BumRushDaShow | Feb 2015 | #6 |
Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:03 AM
cstanleytech (25,384 posts)
1. I'm confused, when did states get the power to decide federal law on immigration?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:18 AM
salib (2,116 posts)
2. Sure is convenient
Just in time, too. Now the Repugs have an excuse to drop the riders to the Homeland Security funding bill and get it past the House and Senate and signed by the Pres. Stop looking like fools.
Besides, now we can concentrate on the Netanyahu craziness. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to salib (Reply #2)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:23 AM
kelliekat44 (7,759 posts)
3. BINGO!!! It has given them an out. They some will feign to not change their minds on funding but
enough will seize the argument to vote for funding DHS. Saved again!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:43 AM
Hugin (31,640 posts)
4. "Texas is part of a 26-state coalition..."
Which 26 States? Or is it just some people in 26 States?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Hugin (Reply #4)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:52 AM
Hugin (31,640 posts)
5. Oh, interesting... Turns out it is the same 26 States questioning the ACA.
"While the Supreme Court upheld the healthcare law on June 28, 2012, it validated the argument made by the 26 states that the federal government had overreached its authority by enacting the measure."
Those States are: Florida South Carolina Nebraska Texas Utah Louisiana Alabama Colorado Michigan Pennsylvania Washington Idaho South Dakota Indiana Mississippi Nevada Arizona Georgia Alaska NFIB North Dakota Wisconsin Iowa Ohio Kansas Wyoming Maine From: http://www.healthcarelawsuit.us/ So, now they're all about Immigration? I smell BS. Yeah, I answered my own question. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Jesus Malverde (Original post)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:04 AM
BumRushDaShow (118,171 posts)
6. Dupe
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141016172
Plus your article was dated Feb 16th. Most think this ruling will be overturned on appeal. |
Cannot reply in locked threads