Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,016 posts)
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:30 PM Feb 2015

VA Secretary Robert McDonald Falsely Claimed He Served In Special Forces

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Robert McDonald, the secretary of veterans affairs, wrongly claimed in a videotaped comment earlier this year that he served in special operations forces, the most elite units in the armed forces, when his military service of five years was spent almost entirely with the 82nd Airborne Division during the late 1970s.

U.S. special operations forces (SOF) are composed of exhaustively trained and highly capable troops from each military service, including the Green Berets, Army Rangers, Delta Force and Navy SEALs -- but not the 82nd Airborne. They are certified to undertake the most dangerous and delicate missions, including, famously, the killing of Osama bin Laden in May 2011. Special operators are a close-knit community deeply hostile to outsiders who try to claim the coveted mantle of special operations.

McDonald, a retired corporate executive who took over the VA last June as the agency was sinking in scandal, made the claim in late January as he was touring a rundown Los Angeles neighborhood during a nationwide count of homeless veterans. He was accompanied by a CBS-TV news crew, which recorded an exchange between McDonald and a homeless man who told McDonald he had served in special forces.

“Special forces? What years? I was in special forces!” McDonald told the homeless man. That exchange was broadcast in a Jan. 30 CBS News story about the VA’s efforts to find and house homeless veterans.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/23/robert-mcdonald-special-forces_n_6739184.html



I avoid visiting or posting from Huffpo because of the excess clickbait/celebrity gossip/pseudoscience on the site. This is an exception, since Huffpo broke this story.
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VA Secretary Robert McDonald Falsely Claimed He Served In Special Forces (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2015 OP
he should resign. mopinko Feb 2015 #1
Why? Because he attempted empathy with one down on his luck veteran...really? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #10
vets will have no respect for him. mopinko Feb 2015 #17
Small error... catnhatnh Feb 2015 #26
Since you want to speak for vets, are you yourself a veteran? HubertHeaver Feb 2015 #37
I don't want to speak for vets or anybody. former9thward Feb 2015 #55
My challenge is to the inclusive statement HubertHeaver Feb 2015 #70
Well I agree with that. former9thward Feb 2015 #71
nope i am not. mopinko Feb 2015 #56
You are accusing a man of "stolen valor" HubertHeaver Feb 2015 #73
did i say i wasnt speaking for myself as well? mopinko Feb 2015 #74
Mopinko speaks for this vet, GGJohn Feb 2015 #62
that was my first thought. We can't be hypocrites here, condemning one guy like CTyankee Feb 2015 #51
oh, he was telling that one for the veteran's benefit CreekDog Feb 2015 #43
small error? more like big problem- mopinko Feb 2015 #59
I was in the Praetorian Guard Tom Ripley Feb 2015 #2
Yeah, but you're old. Adsos Letter Feb 2015 #3
True Tom Ripley Feb 2015 #4
Ah... Adsos Letter Feb 2015 #6
I was a Terra Cotta Warrior rpannier Feb 2015 #12
extremely minor Enrique Feb 2015 #5
I agree Tom Ripley Feb 2015 #7
How can an abject lie be minor? He was on camera claiming a history TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #9
He claimed no "history".... He was attempting to engage, not mislead anyone....he has an Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #11
Huh? Anyone honorable in the military knows you NEVER claim a service TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #13
So...he should....resign?? There was no mention of medals/honours, education, etc.....Context. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #14
Maybe he should. Is the truth flexible for him? TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #15
least of all special forces ferchrisakes. mopinko Feb 2015 #20
The defense seems to be "well, it was JUST a homeless vet." I mean, THOSE are TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #21
So it ends. With a strawman. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #25
"He said this in passing to a homeless man? So minor..." TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #31
I agree Fred. elias49 Feb 2015 #32
Hmm jollyreaper2112 Feb 2015 #38
Some advice, not mine: Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #49
Outrage first, facts and logic afterwards. It is the way of the Internet. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #42
Remember when you tried to shame a poster for flying the Rainbow Flag during the Olympics? CreekDog Feb 2015 #44
I am honored to have you as yet another fan club member bearing ad hominem and strawman gifts. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #45
It's not ad hominem to bring up your own words CreekDog Feb 2015 #46
The shame should be in distorting the position of another on LGBT rights. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #47
if your behavior doesn't represent your position, that shame is on you CreekDog Feb 2015 #48
You're calling for facts when defending a liar? That is novel. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #66
a good way to see how minor it is Enrique Feb 2015 #16
Williams, O'Reilly, and Kyle were not Cabinet members, public servants TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #18
No, it's not. Veterans have been lied to enough. Don't need another liar. n/t jtuck004 Feb 2015 #24
except this mopinko Feb 2015 #60
He said this in passing to a homeless man? .......so minor as to be laughable. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #8
Because it's totally ok to lie, as long as it's just a homeless person. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2015 #23
Strawman? Correct? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #27
To whom must he say it before it counts? Recorded by CBS news, to a homeless man, is ok? arcane1 Feb 2015 #28
Reasoned argument always loses out to firmly held outrage. Forgive me, you win. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #30
laugh at this mopinko Feb 2015 #61
Not possible since you are on Full Ignore. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #63
Obviously not on Full Ignore GGJohn Feb 2015 #64
Maybe he should have told the guy, "Oh, you're homeless? I'm homeless too!" Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #67
Phony DustyJoe Feb 2015 #19
What a moron. iandhr Feb 2015 #22
That can't even be the "least untruthful" approach Jack Rabbit Feb 2015 #29
I'm guessing Sgent Feb 2015 #33
Everyone knows exactly what the term "special forces" means. former9thward Feb 2015 #58
A rather rinky dink comment caught on tape Kaleva Feb 2015 #34
Ah jollyreaper2112 Feb 2015 #39
Like I said, it matters to people who get a boner over stuff like this. Kaleva Feb 2015 #40
Like you said, getting a boner over all things military...all lies are equal is actually being said! Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #69
At least he didn't claim to come under sniper fire and that he had to run with his head down into progree Feb 2015 #35
While accompanied by his daughter. HubertHeaver Feb 2015 #36
He needs to resign immediately. nt Sienna86 Feb 2015 #41
Get a life. elias49 Feb 2015 #50
I don't know how people misremember such important information. Renew Deal Feb 2015 #52
IIRC all special forces, rangers and airborne go to jump school HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #53
nope. you have to go through sere training. mopinko Feb 2015 #57
Lying about service from an officer... nil desperandum Feb 2015 #54
Update - so it ends with much ado about next to nothing, as predicted.............. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #65
Sorry, but that was no mis-statement, it was a false statement. GGJohn Feb 2015 #68
Yes, let's talk about Putin's lies too, are you on board with that? CreekDog Feb 2015 #72
Biggest strawman I have seen in weeks....on topic, too bad about no one asking anyone to resign. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #75
I guess you don't read your own posts CreekDog Feb 2015 #78
at least he admitted it and apologized. mopinko Feb 2015 #76
I have a hard time accepting his apology, GGJohn Feb 2015 #77
Missing the real point Shoonra Mar 2015 #79
Insightful post. Thank you. greatlaurel Mar 2015 #80

mopinko

(70,077 posts)
17. vets will have no respect for him.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:03 PM
Feb 2015

nor should they. special forces go through some truly harrowing training, and it is a high honor. it's not like saying you were in nam when you were in california.

stolen valor it is called. stolen.
dont think vets wont see it that way. he has deeply insulted a lot of people with that remark.

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
37. Since you want to speak for vets, are you yourself a veteran?
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:01 AM
Feb 2015

If so, what branch, when, where, what did you do?

former9thward

(31,974 posts)
55. I don't want to speak for vets or anybody.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:10 PM
Feb 2015

But I agree with the poster you are challenging. The Secretary should resign. Oh, even though it does not matter, I served in the Air Force, 126th Air Refueling Wing, late 80s, doing, guess what? refueling aircraft.

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
70. My challenge is to the inclusive statement
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:28 PM
Feb 2015

&quot All) vets will have no respect for him. Nor should they."

There is no way the poster, veteran or not, can know what all veterans think or even should think.

former9thward

(31,974 posts)
71. Well I agree with that.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:32 PM
Feb 2015

Vets are good people, bad people, heroes, jerks, outstanding citizens, criminals. Nobody speaks for them all.

mopinko

(70,077 posts)
56. nope i am not.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:13 PM
Feb 2015

and usually i dont speak about the army to stick up for them.
but i have a nephew who has just retired after his whole adult life in the army, rising to the point where he was up for a general's star. he didnt get that, so instead he was given a one year post as obama's advisor on counter terrorism.
he went through every grueling army training program there is. he did 7 tours of the middle east.

i know exactly what he would think.
alright with you if i channel him?

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
73. You are accusing a man of "stolen valor"
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:43 PM
Feb 2015

yet you want to channel your nephew?

I won't accuse you of stealing valor. Borrowing valor perhaps. Stealing, no.

mopinko

(70,077 posts)
74. did i say i wasnt speaking for myself as well?
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 05:10 PM
Feb 2015

i am greatly disturbed, not just by this guy, but by the taint of dishonor that all the services have brought upon themselves by lying in this instance and many others.
i channel my nephew because i believe him to be someone who actually lives the code of honor.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/careers/army/2015/02/19/-army-lying-distrust-ethics/23678429/

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
62. Mopinko speaks for this vet,
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:30 PM
Feb 2015

he should resign, he purposely lied about being in the SF, he knew darn well that he wasn't a former SF operator.

CTyankee

(63,901 posts)
51. that was my first thought. We can't be hypocrites here, condemning one guy like
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:02 AM
Feb 2015

O'Reilly and saying McDonald is OK because he's helping vets. Can't he help vets without lying? He's being dishonest.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
5. extremely minor
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:43 PM
Feb 2015

he's working to help homeless veterans, a homeless man says he was in Special Forces, and McDonald says "me too!"

And that's it. That's the whole story.

Maybe this will shine a light on the effort to help homeless vets. Maybe someone will look into how that homeless man is doing now.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
9. How can an abject lie be minor? He was on camera claiming a history
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:52 PM
Feb 2015

he didn't have--and for the purpose of patronizing a fellow veteran, who was perhaps homeless, but didn't deserve to be fed a line of bullshit like he was a child.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
11. He claimed no "history".... He was attempting to engage, not mislead anyone....he has an
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:54 PM
Feb 2015

exemplary and crystal clear service history...tempest in an over sensitive media teapot.

Not like he was repeatedly lying to the world about being in a war zone, or in a helicopter under fire and lied about it repeatedly over years in order to self promote and build up false trust...not even in the same ballpark...sorry, you are wrong.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
13. Huh? Anyone honorable in the military knows you NEVER claim a service
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:58 PM
Feb 2015

record, education, or medals/honors you never earned. No, not even to some homeless guy for the purpose of "engaging" him. He could have said, truthfully, "I served in the 82nd Airborne". Why lie, and then keep going with it: "What years (were you in)?"

mopinko

(70,077 posts)
20. least of all special forces ferchrisakes.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:06 PM
Feb 2015

he should resign because this shows how STUPID he is.

i'm not usually that rah rah about such things. but i have a nephew who is just retiring after 30 years in the service, and he went through all that. it aint no sewing circle.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
21. The defense seems to be "well, it was JUST a homeless vet." I mean, THOSE are
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:10 PM
Feb 2015

the guys you can bullshit, amirite? Even if the homeless man was himself bullshitting about being SF, a cabinet secretary shouldn't.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
31. "He said this in passing to a homeless man? So minor..."
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:22 AM
Feb 2015

So in what other contexts is it OK for an important public official to make up a bullshit story? Does the truth depend on the importance or social status of the audience?

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
32. I agree Fred.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:23 AM
Feb 2015

He was communicating with another human being. Empathizing.
More people should try it.
I DO get tired of the self-righteousness of some posters.
"He lied!!" - regardless of details, nuance.
"He broke a law" - despite a greater good.

Sanctimony


jollyreaper2112

(1,941 posts)
38. Hmm
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:33 AM
Feb 2015

I, too was a young Somali girl who suffered through female castration and an arranged marriage to a much older man. Ok, not really but empathy, yo.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
44. Remember when you tried to shame a poster for flying the Rainbow Flag during the Olympics?
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 08:53 AM
Feb 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4463300

Don't lecture people when you yourself have posted pretty outrageous things.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
45. I am honored to have you as yet another fan club member bearing ad hominem and strawman gifts.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 08:55 AM
Feb 2015

I am a supporter of LGBT rights, you can go do some more searching of my posts if you like.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
46. It's not ad hominem to bring up your own words
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 08:58 AM
Feb 2015

especially when you're lecturing people on how to behave and how to speak about something.

unless you're ashamed and embarrassed to have lectured him not to fly the Rainbow Flag, are you sorry you told him that, that he was doing a disservice to the Olympics?

no, there was no shame, no apology.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
47. The shame should be in distorting the position of another on LGBT rights.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 09:01 AM
Feb 2015

Strawman.

Black hat/white hat views of the world are not my style.

Who follows around another posters posts anyway, on unrelated matters especially?

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
16. a good way to see how minor it is
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:02 PM
Feb 2015

compare it to Brian Williams, or Bill O'Reilly, or Chris Kyle. They all lied at length. They wove stories.

You have a point with the target of the lie, I really don't know whether this might matter from his point of view. Anyway, maybe someone will track him down and see if he has any thoughts on the matter. And while they're at it they can see if he's still homeless.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
18. Williams, O'Reilly, and Kyle were not Cabinet members, public servants
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:04 PM
Feb 2015

who were sworn in to serve the American people. Edit to add: I supported McDonald, but this is troubling.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
64. Obviously not on Full Ignore
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:37 PM
Feb 2015

as you were able to see Mopinko's post and respond to it.
BTW, do you understand the concept of honour pertaining to Military Officers?

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
19. Phony
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:04 PM
Feb 2015

With his 'simple LIE' as described by some, he has branded himself as a phony to those he supposedly serves. If he can lie about his service, he can lie about anything. Stolen valor is just that, stolen. As a previous poster already called it, he needs to step down, he's untrustworthy.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
29. That can't even be the "least untruthful" approach
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:49 PM
Feb 2015

It's time for Mr. McDonald to spend more time with his family.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
33. I'm guessing
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:50 AM
Feb 2015

he meant he served in a special operations force.

The 82nd airborne along with Marine Corp Expeditionary Units and some other units are "Special Operations Capable". There is a distinction between that and special forces, but I'm not sure what he was trying to say.

former9thward

(31,974 posts)
58. Everyone knows exactly what the term "special forces" means.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:17 PM
Feb 2015

I saw the segment at the time it aired. Frankly given the way the homeless guy said it and the way McDonald said it I immediately thought they were both lying. McDonald knew there was a tv camera filming him and he knew exactly what the term would convey to the viewers.

Kaleva

(36,294 posts)
34. A rather rinky dink comment caught on tape
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 02:03 AM
Feb 2015

If he has a history of embellishing his record, then I'd be concerned. This one incident is important to those who get a boner over all things military.

jollyreaper2112

(1,941 posts)
39. Ah
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:39 AM
Feb 2015

So only the big lies count? There's little lies like I don't feel like going out tonight but really I don't want to spend time with you. There's telling your boss you're working on X when you forgot all about it but can still get it done in time. And then there's lying about important shit. No I did not have sex with that woman. No officer I wasn't drinking. Yes, those are my actual qualifications.

You can have some fun with a bar story like something happened and you thought of the funny thing to say to the people involved an hour later and you just include that line in the retelling. There's editing your story for clarity, exaggerating a yarn for comedic effect. But then there's just lying. Saying what happened when you and your buddies were drinking is one thing. If you're driving and come across a car accident and the story somehow becomes you pulled a family to safety from a burning wreck when it was actually the first responders, that is lying. The kind of person who makes shit like that up is not to be trusted. Yes, it matters. No, it's not a little fibbing. Fibbing is how big that fish you caught was.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
69. Like you said, getting a boner over all things military...all lies are equal is actually being said!
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 02:40 PM
Feb 2015

progree

(10,901 posts)
35. At least he didn't claim to come under sniper fire and that he had to run with his head down into
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 03:00 AM
Feb 2015

waiting vehicles.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
50. Get a life.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 09:58 AM
Feb 2015

And while you're at it, go find that homeless vet and tell him to get his s*** together and stop complaining.
Tell him to his face that his breath is bad (hey, if it's the truth...:shrug
Tell him, 'Meh, so you were special forces. Big woop'
Maybe tell him, 'Hey, you know I don't even know why i'm here. got better stuff to do''
cuz, hey, it's the truth.

Happy to offer this to all the tight-shorts folks in this thread.


Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
52. I don't know how people misremember such important information.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:06 AM
Feb 2015

I think they eventually believe the lie.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
53. IIRC all special forces, rangers and airborne go to jump school
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:38 AM
Feb 2015

I think that selection to SF and Ranger training usually happens after completion of jump school

So, iirc-and I may not...I never wanted to jump out of aircraft or even be air-mobile... it' seems possible an airborne and a special forces person could share training experiences and possibly share a moment in personal history.

When vets realize their paths are similar one of the first questions is 'when were you there'.

I don't want to make excuses for the guy because he might be purposefully lying, but it's also possible it was a matter of misspeaking.




nil desperandum

(654 posts)
54. Lying about service from an officer...
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 11:25 AM
Feb 2015
“I have no excuse,” McDonald told The Huffington Post, when contacted to explain his claim. “I was not in special forces.”


THE HONOR CODE

A CADET WILL NOT LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, OR TOLERATE THOSE WHO DO.

http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1951/18250/whitepaper.htm


He knows he lied, he knows it was completely incorrect for a former officer to lie.

For the record, Ranger Tabbed is no more a ranger than the Basic Parachutist Badge makes you a paratrooper. The tab means nothing more than you are now qualified to serve with the Rangers, but you aren't a Ranger until you serve in the Battalions. The tab means he could have been a Ranger but chose not to be as he didn't serve in a Ranger Battalion and earn the scroll.

Same with Jump School, if you graduate jump school but are not serving in a paratrooper unit you are just another Ft. Benning five jump chump.

I served in support of SF unit operations, I was a regular jump qualified 11Bravo and while our service was alongside each other I would never claim to be SF because I wasn't. Serving alongside isn't serving within even if you still get shot at.

Honest soldiers and men of character know the truth.

Having said that, I'm not terribly surprised and the fact he apologized immediately means he knows he screwed up. I was truly hoping his business skills would make him the guy to put the VA right with the veterans who need that service. Here's hoping this apology puts him back on the path to righteousness and he can get back to work making the VA function properly.

I would not be surprised if this results in him losing this job however.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
65. Update - so it ends with much ado about next to nothing, as predicted..............
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:19 PM
Feb 2015

"Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., called the misstatement an error but said "it doesn't dim the fact that he served honorably."

He said: "We should all take him at his word and Washington shouldn't spend the next two weeks arguing about it. The Secretary has a job to do -- clean up the scandal-plagued VA. This latest controversy shouldn't shift one iota of focus away from that long overdue task."

The White House released a statement Monday evening saying that it had accepted McDonald's explanation.

"Secretary McDonald has apologized for the misstatement and noted that he never intended to misrepresent his military service," the statement said. "We take him at his word and expect that this will not impact the important work he’s doing to promote the health and well-being of our nation’s veterans.""

Shall we move on and back to actual consequential GOP lies?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
68. Sorry, but that was no mis-statement, it was a false statement.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:28 PM
Feb 2015

Anyone who was career military knows the difference between being an SF operator and not being an SF operator.
Not buying his explanation.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
77. I have a hard time accepting his apology,
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 05:16 PM
Feb 2015

I was career Army, we knew what our MOS was, he darn well knew that he was never an SF operator, this was knowingly said by him and I agree with you, there's probably more false claims out there from him.

Shoonra

(520 posts)
79. Missing the real point
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 12:22 PM
Mar 2015

Bob McDonald's real military record is published for everyone to see in his Senate confirmation hearings, so he wasn't trying to get something tangible in a one-on-one conversation with a homeless vet which CBS overheard. It turns out that McDonald did do some Army training with Special Forces although he was in the Airborne and not a member of the Green Berets. So he exaggerated that a tiny bit to try to get a conversation going with a homeless vet. BFD.

What nobody seems upset about is that here was a Green Beret veteran who was forced to live in a cardboard box on the street, in the middle of a brutal winter, with no home and no secure source of food or warmth. McDonald was sufficiently upset about that to try, desperately, to converse with that vet but the rest of us want to throw rocks at McDonald instead of showing concern for the homeless Green Beret.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
80. Insightful post. Thank you.
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 12:42 PM
Mar 2015

It seems extraordinarily strange to me that the news media makes a big stink over McDonald's exaggeration of his record while completely ignoring the scandal of a homeless Green Beret veteran living on the street in a cardboard box. Even the great Charlie Pierce got caught up with bashing McDonald instead of showing outrage for the lack of care for a veteran. Our news media has been captured by flimflam artists.

Thank you for saying this so well.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»VA Secretary Robert McDon...