Clinton defends family foundation from charges of favoritism
Source: AP
KEENE, N.H. (AP) Hillary Rodham Clinton dismissed swirling questions about her family foundation Monday as little more than political attacks from Republicans eager to gain an early advantage in the 2016 presidential contest.
Clinton, campaigning for the Democratic nomination in the liberal bastion of Keene, pushed back against accusations that foreign governments that made donations to the Clintons' charity received preferential treatment from the State Department while she served in the Obama administration.
"We will be subjected to all kinds of distractions and attacks," she told reporters after a roundtable event at a wood furniture factory. "I'm ready for that. I know that that comes, unfortunately, with the territory."
On Monday, she criticized her opponents for focusing so much of their attention on her.
"It is, I think, worth noting that the Republicans seem to be talking only about me," she said. "Hopefully we'll get onto the issues."
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-trying-recapture-hampshire-magic-070356382--election.html
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Larry Engels
(387 posts)Then you rub grease all over them to get an oily-garchy. This makes them too slippery to have a "stand" on issues, education, etc.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)How many polling points over the GOP Clown Car has Clinton gained after the email "scandal"??
Keeping a Democrat a train length ahead of that carload of insane warmongers, fascists and haters is Job One.
forest444
(5,902 posts)http://www.thenation.com/article/170644/mitt-romneys-bailout-bonanza#
http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2014/06/20/paul-singer-contributes-to-american-crossroads/
That's one brigand with plenty of parrots of his payroll - though he did lose one very big-headed parrot recently: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.radionacional.com.ar/%3Fp%3D49313&prev=search
freshwest
(53,661 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)And throw Singer in a South American jail while they're at it.
He could do the laundry.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)She is sinking in most polls and trailing Rand Paul in some.
Here's one article to get you started:http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2184 there are lots more, do a google.
Didn't take long for a repeat of 2008 to start, did it?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)In general, Republicans see Bush as the best possible candidate to match up against the Democratic nominee in 2016, but in hypothetical general election matchups against Clinton, Bush trails by a large margin, as do each of the other seven Republicans tested.
Marco Rubio fares best against the former first lady, trailing Clinton by 14 points, 55% to 41%. Bush trails Clinton by 17 points, 56% to 39%. Christie and Paul fall 19 points behind Clinton, each putting up 39% to Clinton's 58%. Huckabee, Walker, Carson and Cruz each trail Clinton by more than 20 points.
http://us.cnn.com/2015/04/20/politics/2016-elections-republican-field-poll/index.html
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)But it is too far out to be of much use either way.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)swilton
(5,069 posts)I'm from Keene and I know of none.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)From a WSJ article on the event:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-talks-with-workers-at-new-hampshire-campaign-stop-1429566036
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)The one that the person I replied to didn't know was in their hometown.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)taking money from other countries?
not sure, but I think I read somewhere...
she still takes money
from certain countries....or not..?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)How am I gonna make it through the political process?
Larry Engels
(387 posts)What if she wins? Then it's a 8 years of all Hillary all the time. Get ready for chronic fatigue syndrome.
emulatorloo
(44,186 posts)and those here on DU who are helping out with it.
arikara
(5,562 posts)I mean for pete's sake nobody even knows who's going to run against queen Hillary yet. And who cares who's trailing who at this stage of the game, all this idiotic polling stinks.
candelista
(1,986 posts)Her "defense" is that the attacks are politically motivated. OK, but are they true?
Trajano
(53 posts)Tell us whether you read and fact checked the Republican activist's book.
First go on offense, then criticize the defense.
candelista
(1,986 posts)You know what the accusations are. So what is your point?
yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)Right wing talking points are right wing talking points and are best ignored or dismissed.
If they actually have something, let them spell out what they have and then we can discuss. But nebulous charges of "favoritism" - not so much worth acting on.
candelista
(1,986 posts)At some point she will have to address these questions. They are not just "right wing" talking points. An Iranian businessman is the biggest donor to the Clinton Foundation. What did he get for his money? Just a nice cozy warm feeling inside?
Oh, right, I forgot. We're not supposed to talk about this stuff.
yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)supposition. You got nothing. Talk all you want. But we don't have to agree.
awake
(3,226 posts)Correct me if I am wrong did not Kerry react in much of the same way when the Swift Boating start just brushing it off and letting it fester. The fact that major papers like the New York Times and the Washington Post picked up this so soon can not be a good sign.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)allowed to see his '180' (or whatever that form was),
and then later it was his only his friend
at the Boston Globe.
or something like that.
awake
(3,226 posts)I recall a lot of talk that Kerry waited too long to respond, my point is that if HRC does not get out in front and nip this in the bud it will grow, then again maybe she can not put it to bed.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Who the hell else are they supposed to talk about. She's the only announced Democratic candidate.
Seems to be a bit full of herself.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)getting millions of dollars in donations from foreigners and corporations?
Evergreen Emerald
(13,070 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Look, I totally get it, the republicans are scumbags and she doesn't want to give them anything tangible they can beat her up with.
However at some point she's going to have to stop mouthing platitudes and generalities and make some specific policy statements on things like the TPP, bank regulation, funding Social Security and Medicare, minimum wage, so that she can convince the skeptics in her own party that she actually believes in something that the Democratic party is supposed to stand for.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,070 posts)Refusing to discuss issues and instead attacking Clinton, and you are justifying the republicans ignoring the issues to attack Clinton because she is too vague on the issues?
tularetom
(23,664 posts)At this point she's probably smart to pass it off as a personal attack but she can't parlay the victim card into a general election victory.
It's fine to blather on about how tough things are for the middle class but eventually the middle class is going to want to hear what she proposes to do to get their jobs back, protect their retirement benefits, allow their kids to get an education without being up to their asses in debt, etc.
Bill Clinton and Obama had the personal charisma to sell us a bill of goods and get us to accept it. Ms. Clinton lacks the oratorical skills and the magnetism to do that, she needs to be straight with the public.
Right now she's the only candidate in the race and she hasn't offered any concrete policy positions. So its no big surprise that she's being attacked by her prospective opponents. That's what happens in politics.