Johnson Introduces Bill to Protect Americans from Further Damaging Effects of Obamacare: Preserving
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by DonViejo (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: RON JOHNSON U.S. SENATOR
WASHINGTON Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), along with 29 of his Senate colleagues, introduced a bill Monday that will prevent Americans from being victimized again by Obamacare if the Supreme Court follows the law and rules against the Obama administration this summer in King v. Burwell.
Senator Johnsons bill is named Preserving Freedom and Choice in Health Care and it would do just that. Millions of Americans lost their health care because of Obamacares mandates. Those individuals, together with millions more, would suffer again if the court rules that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act prevents subsidies from being paid through federal exchanges. Such a ruling is consistent with the law, but it would leave those Americans unable to pay for expensive Obamacare coverage that is affordable only when it is subsidized by hardworking taxpayers.
This bill is a first step toward reversing the damage that Obamacare has inflicted on the American health care system, said Senator Johnson. It begins to replace Obamacares expensive mess with patient-focused, market-based reforms.
Read more: http://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=b9c77912-9790-4b01-9586-dc4b225e547d
Hard not to confuse this with an Onion article.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)This is nothing but garbage propaganda from Johnson.
The CCC
(463 posts)I don't know whom I'm more disgusted with Ron Johnson or the morons who voted for him.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Citations please.
Or STFU.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)immunizations) millions of policies were cancelled and replaced with policies that met the requirements. Technically, the GOP can claim that millions had their policies cancelled but Dems need to jump on every reference to that and explain it was to get better coverage. The claim that they "lost their health care" is more dubious because they didn't actually lose their health care permanently.
SansACause
(520 posts)Some of these "lost" policies didn't even cover hospitalization for emergencies. What Obamacare also achieved is the elimination of health insurance scammers.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)This guy is going to go if I have anything to say about it. Please run against him Sen. Feingold!
winstars
(4,220 posts)turbinetree
(24,720 posts)that if we had a U.S. Supreme court that was truly progressive, this laws suit would be dead on arrival.
In a new book by Ian Millhiser, he pretty much hits the nail on the head on what the U.S. Supreme court has done to this country and it really is not pretty.
But with a right wing majority that has been on the court for over 150 years not counting the Burger court and in some key rulings during FDR presidency, we citizens have not been getting our money worth from this court for a long, long time, and what we are due, from voting, wages, safety, healthcare, child labor, ect......
All you have to do is look at Citizens United and the unfettered influence by both foreign and domestic money corrupting this system of governance to the highest PAC.
Just imagine if there are three to four openings for this court and there is a republican president, how many other law clerks like Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Kennedy are in the back ground working for these individuals------that is scary
project_bluebook
(411 posts)I went to a witch doctor down the street, had to give up goats blood and snake bile for a sanitized MD office, disgusting!
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)A press release from a right wing U.S. Senator is not a reputable mainstream news website and/or blog. Further, it is opinion of that right wing Senator and his cohorts.
From the SOP:
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.