Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,550 posts)
Fri May 1, 2015, 04:50 PM May 2015

Bridget Kelly on Bridgegate: 'I Am Not Guilty'

Source: NBC News

A former top ally to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie passionately defended her innocence on Friday after being indicted for her alleged role in creating traffic jams on the busy George Washington Bridge as political retribution in 2013.

"I am not guilty of the crimes for which I was accused. I look forward to sharing the truth," she said in her first public comments since scandal first erupted.

The indictment against Kelly, a former deputy chief of staff to Christie, and Bill Baroni, the former deputy executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, were charged with nine counts, including '"knowingly converting and intentionally misapplying property of an organization receiving federal benefits."

...snip...

"It is an absurd thought to believe that a member of the governor's staff could close the George Washington Bridge," Kelly said.



Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/bridget-kelly-bridgegate-i-am-not-guilty-n352236



So, just to be clear, is she 1) denying she wrote the email (with her name on it) saying "time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee"? Or is she saying this had a different meaning?
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bridget Kelly on Bridgegate: 'I Am Not Guilty' (Original Post) brooklynite May 2015 OP
My take: She's saying SHE couldn't have done it without being given the authority to do so. blm May 2015 #1
OR, more likely, she did it on the understanding that this was what her boss wanted. calimary May 2015 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #21
I was actually going to respond to the person whose post is no longer there. calimary May 2015 #27
well put.. laserhaas May 2015 #29
That's How I Interpreted It..... global1 May 2015 #4
Could also be a threat to Christie if he keeps blocking state pay of her legal bills. blm May 2015 #9
My take is "My Ass, Bridget." calimary May 2015 #2
; ) blm May 2015 #13
Not guilty huh... TlalocW May 2015 #5
ha ha.... laserhaas May 2015 #30
Don't believe her. hrmjustin May 2015 #6
It could have a different meaning ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #7
Uh huh...and I have a bridge to sell ya. SoapBox May 2015 #8
This is just the first shoe dropping. Gonna be fun to watch the chess pieces fall. lindysalsagal May 2015 #10
Christie was already known for NOT using email because he didn't want anything blm May 2015 #12
So if it was was done by phone calls, does the NSA have them? Is this racketeering? mpcamb May 2015 #35
My take is that she believes Gov. Christie lovemydog May 2015 #11
"Bridge It" says she's not guilty.... Historic NY May 2015 #14
yes it's absurd to say you did it on your own. But, nevertheless, you are going to take the 'fall'. Bill USA May 2015 #15
Fine! Then talk! Who ordered it, Bridget? longship May 2015 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #22
Well, somebody had to decide to do it? longship May 2015 #23
Here. Excerpts from emails: LiberalElite May 2015 #26
kick for Bridgett spilling the beans on christie Cha May 2015 #17
I will never believe that Christie did not know what was going on. avebury May 2015 #18
Her desk was w/in a few seconds of a walk of Gov. C.C. and do you think she would close down .... Botany May 2015 #19
The Feds have a good conviction rate, Bridget- You should start mitigating things in your favor. NBachers May 2015 #20
She's gonna sing... Itchinjim May 2015 #24
As Monty Brewster once said.... davidpdx May 2015 #25
Richard Nixon: "I am not a crook" George II May 2015 #28
U.S. Attorney Chris Christie rigged elections laserhaas May 2015 #31
"Falling on your sword". sendero May 2015 #32
like in the Serenity film, as she's in Goodfella marsh laserhaas May 2015 #33
She read what? A 248 page explanation that said nothing? ChairmanAgnostic May 2015 #34

blm

(113,059 posts)
1. My take: She's saying SHE couldn't have done it without being given the authority to do so.
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:01 PM
May 2015

A 'member of the staff' wouldn't have that authority unless it was arranged beforehand.

calimary

(81,262 posts)
3. OR, more likely, she did it on the understanding that this was what her boss wanted.
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:08 PM
May 2015

Especially considering the tone he set, the bullying, rude, confrontational, punitive in-yer-face shit he's famous for. We've seen publicly, many times, how he treats people. God knows what kind of unspoken rules his dutiful underlings felt were important to execute in his name.

Response to calimary (Reply #3)

calimary

(81,262 posts)
27. I was actually going to respond to the person whose post is no longer there.
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:28 PM
May 2015

Yeah, indeed, maybe we're trying to do some mind-reading here. One is often given to that kind of pursuit when no information is forthcoming to objectively inform one's conclusions. Sometimes all we can do is speculate. Try to analyze. Try to assess from WHATEVER even bare traces of information can be gleaned. Like for example, there's information to be derived from NOT being informed. Is there a reason there's a bias or something relevant was left out? Or maybe you study body language or parse language or word choices - looking for clues. If information isn't forthcoming, for example, if the police take days and days and days to come up with anything except for that almost too obvious little trick with the leak to the Washington Post about how Freddie Gray somehow broke his own spine. That was so contrived and so phony and so blatantly manipulative that I was actually insulted by it. But when it's just astoundingly stinky bullshit, and that's all there is, what else can a body do but guess, or, yes, mind-read?

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
29. well put..
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:43 AM
May 2015

Moi did a GD thread on how inane it is for WaPo to be part of smear chit and cover up absurdity campaign that Freddie Gray broke his own spine.

There should be an agency that gives turd awards to propaganda machines like WaPo

global1

(25,247 posts)
4. That's How I Interpreted It.....
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:09 PM
May 2015

She said "It is an absurd thought to believe that a member of the governor's staff could close the George Washington Bridge".

I interpreted that she wouldn't have the authority - but somebody much more powerful than me would have the authority.

Like the Governor?

She's also saying that she "looks forward to sharing the truth". Could she be turning on Crispy?

blm

(113,059 posts)
9. Could also be a threat to Christie if he keeps blocking state pay of her legal bills.
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:18 PM
May 2015

Basically - looks bad for Christie either way. If he doesn't allow the state to pay her legal fees, she can turn talkative. If he starts paying now it will raise even more questions starting with - Why now?

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
30. ha ha....
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:46 AM
May 2015

Isn't amazing how often names are apropos?

Like Judge Hammer

Or Doctor Tool

Now if they could just come up with Ofgicer hand....

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. It could have a different meaning ...
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:17 PM
May 2015

I, once, was in a deposition in a sexual harassment case where the owner of a medium sized funeral home/crematory was accused of creating a (sexually) hostile work environment for his female employees. As the depo advanced I asked about a specific comment that he was alleged to have made ... "{Name of the Complainant} will do anything to get laid ... and I'm gonna help her!"

Of course, the Accused Owner denied making the comment, or anything like that comment ... No, it was not he did not recall making the comment, he "DID NOT, AND WOULD NEVER SAY ANYTHING LIKE THAT" ... He is a Christian and has a family, and a daughter the age of the accuser, dont'tcha know!

I produced, and played, a tape recording of him not making the comment, and asked was that his voice ... after a couple minutes pause, the accused owner stated: "Well ... yes ... but you have to understand ... 'Getting laid' is a term of art in this business, meaning: 'to be placed in a casket' ... there was nothing sexual about that comment." His attorney did not react; but, the stenographer (someone that we used probably a thousand times, over the years, and I had never seen her respond to anything she heard) ... just stopped typing and just looked at the accused.

The only response I could muster (because of the stenographer's reaction) was to say, "Okay." And then, I turned to the stenographer and asked her to read back the accused's response.

So yeah ... the email with her name on it COULD have meant something different to her and the person she was sending it to!

lindysalsagal

(20,683 posts)
10. This is just the first shoe dropping. Gonna be fun to watch the chess pieces fall.
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:18 PM
May 2015

You know she's got emails or recorded phone calls. There are always witnesses to something this big and deliberate. The indictments allow for subpoenas. That's when the real fun starts.

No worker bee would ever pull this stunt.

blm

(113,059 posts)
12. Christie was already known for NOT using email because he didn't want anything
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:28 PM
May 2015

he did to have his fingerprints on it. He learned that when HE was the US attorney and exaggerating crimes based on emails of his political targets. For HIS age group (he's NOT an older politician unfamiliar with computers) that's exactly the approach someone would take who knew he'd have plenty to hide.

mpcamb

(2,870 posts)
35. So if it was was done by phone calls, does the NSA have them? Is this racketeering?
Sat May 2, 2015, 10:00 AM
May 2015

Should they come into play as evidence?

Much as I detest domestic spying, if you're contending there's a reason for it, THIS is it.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
11. My take is that she believes Gov. Christie
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:22 PM
May 2015

should be indicted, or named as an un-indicted coconspirator.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
15. yes it's absurd to say you did it on your own. But, nevertheless, you are going to take the 'fall'.
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:41 PM
May 2015


the 'privates' always take the 'fall' for the 'generals'.

longship

(40,416 posts)
16. Fine! Then talk! Who ordered it, Bridget?
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:45 PM
May 2015

For Christ (ie) sake!

If she doesn't start telling the truth she needs to do some serious hard time. Sadly, that isn't likely to happen. Hard time or not, she's likely to go away for a while. One would hope.

Response to longship (Reply #16)

longship

(40,416 posts)
23. Well, somebody had to decide to do it?
Fri May 1, 2015, 06:37 PM
May 2015

I don't think for a second that it was a deputy chief of staff. Might as well claim that it was deputy Barney Fife.

Get it?

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
26. Here. Excerpts from emails:
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:48 PM
May 2015
http://nj1015.com/excerpts-from-the-bridgegate-emails/

-Snip-
New Jersey 101.5 has obtained copies of emails exchanged by state officials before, during and after the unannounced lane closings at the George Washington Bridge between Sept. 9 and 13.

The thread begins with an Aug. 13 email exchange between Bridget Anne Kelly, Gov. Christie’s deputy chief of staff, and David Wildstein, the Port Authority official who later resigned when it was disclosed that he ordered the lane closures.

Kelly’s message reads: “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Less.” [sic]
Wildstein’s reply: “Got it.”
-snip-


Read More: Excerpts from the ‘Bridgegate’ Emails | http://nj1015.com/excerpts-from-the-bridgegate-emails/?trackback=tsmclip

avebury

(10,952 posts)
18. I will never believe that Christie did not know what was going on.
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:50 PM
May 2015

In the state that I live in, if there where anything like the cluster f**k of a road/highway/bridge slow down like what occurred in NJ you had better believe that it would have been all over the news. The local media would be hounding every office they can think of in state and local government to know what was going on. And people would be calling the Governor's Office, State Reps and State Senators to complain about it.

I work for a state agency and there is just no how no way that you could hide what is going on when it comes to something like that. A Governor would have to be deaf, dumb, blind or just plain oblivious to try to claim he/she did know what was going on. And you could never close down something on the level of the lanes of the GW Bridge without having authorization at the highest level unless it is a real identifiable hazard to the driving public (like a crumbling bridge). And press releases would be put out about the location and what is going on to inform the public.

Christie's claim of ignorance has always been absurd to say the least.

Botany

(70,504 posts)
19. Her desk was w/in a few seconds of a walk of Gov. C.C. and do you think she would close down ....
Fri May 1, 2015, 05:52 PM
May 2015

..... the busyist bridge in America w/out Christie's knowledge.

I hope she sings like a bird.


NBachers

(17,108 posts)
20. The Feds have a good conviction rate, Bridget- You should start mitigating things in your favor.
Fri May 1, 2015, 06:14 PM
May 2015

Give up the Big Guy.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
25. As Monty Brewster once said....
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:16 PM
May 2015

"Send them to the showers, it's going to take them about 20 years to dry off where they are going."

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
31. U.S. Attorney Chris Christie rigged elections
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:52 AM
May 2015

As one of GWB's USA's that prosecuted Democrats (he even kept a fraudster out if jail, giving hin $50k per month to live on...with a directive to go bribe candidates.....{where almost all were found not guilty}).

This is just a march (hopefully) to nail corrupt Chris Christie

sendero

(28,552 posts)
32. "Falling on your sword".
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:53 AM
May 2015

..... means falling on your sword. Since you would not implicate Christie, it must be you.

Suck it up.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
33. like in the Serenity film, as she's in Goodfella marsh
Sat May 2, 2015, 08:01 AM
May 2015

Lands...

It will either be her (looking) as if she fell on her sword...her being the total blamed gal doing a short stint and coming out rich

Or she'll sleep with the swamp fishes, under Hoffa (er..I mean Meadowlands), Bew jersey, marshes

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
34. She read what? A 248 page explanation that said nothing?
Sat May 2, 2015, 09:10 AM
May 2015

About half way through her presentation, not having heard one thing of substance, I went to the bathroom, flushed, washed my hands, cooked a grill cheese sandwich, poured some fresh coffee, went back to her speech and realized that I had had missed Not One Thing of importance.

So, she proved that she can read empty sentences.


Did I miss something of substance? Probably not.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bridget Kelly on Bridgega...