Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Wed May 6, 2015, 09:04 PM May 2015

CVS officially confirms plan to reopen stores burned in Baltimore riots

Source: Baltimore Sun

The CVS Pharmacy stores looted and burned by rioters in Baltimore last week will be rebuilt, CVS Health formally announced Wednesday.

The firm, which has nearly 30 locations in Baltimore and employs more than 500 people, said it also plans to donate a total of $100,000 to two funds established to help recovery from the riots — the United Way of Central Maryland "Maryland Unites Fund" and the Baltimore Community Foundation "Fund for Rebuilding Baltimore."

CVS previously said it was working on rebuilding plans, while the city said the firm had committed to reopening. CVS Health President and CEO Larry Merlo on Wednesday called rebuilding the "right thing to do."



Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-cvs-20150506-story.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cstanleytech

(26,233 posts)
2. Good, I am still angry at the assholes who resorted to arson though
Wed May 6, 2015, 10:07 PM
May 2015

as its going to still hurt alot of innocent folks who will end up losing their jobs with companies that decide to just take the insurance money and abandon the area rather than rebuild and risk literally getting burned twice.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
4. Why didn't Ferguson and Baltimore request help from the National Guard?
Thu May 7, 2015, 04:08 AM
May 2015

It's not as if the outcome was not predictable. Along with the peaceful protesters there was bound to be an element that would take advantage of the situation to loot and destroy. It happens every single time.



BumRushDaShow

(128,442 posts)
11. I think the article said that
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:22 PM
May 2015

something like 400+ people were arrested. But as a note, if someone wants to "take" a city the size of Baltimore, you would needs tens of thousands of troops, and that is just ridiculous.

But it seems National Guard weren't needed for these looters in California -



Nothing to see there... just a "headache" and a "disturbance" from "unruly crowds".

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
12. Where were the cops while that was going on?
Fri May 8, 2015, 12:51 AM
May 2015

Poor behavior in one place doesn't excuse similar behavior elsewhere.

BumRushDaShow

(128,442 posts)
13. That's the problem, isn't it?
Fri May 8, 2015, 05:10 AM
May 2015


It definitely doesn't excuse the behavior but it precisely illustrates the unequal application of "policing" based on who you are and what you look like, and the linked article's very carefully worded descriptions of what had happened, very obviously downplays the violent "behavior" in that case. And many of us wonder why?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,321 posts)
6. Baltimore's mayor wanted to give people "space" to destroy ...
Thu May 7, 2015, 08:17 AM
May 2015

... but there's some waffling about the context of the comment.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/baltimore-unrest/mayor-stephanie-rawlings-blake-under-fire-giving-space-destroy-baltimore-n349656

It would be a reason to hold off the National Guard until the less-than-peaceful people got the looting and arson out of their systems. Sounds like a rope-a-dope strategy.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
10. I don't think that what she said is exactly what she meant.
Thu May 7, 2015, 12:57 PM
May 2015

I don't think that she meant give them freedom to burn and loot. She was probably referring to the peaceful protests. The problem is that these type of protests always seem to devolve into mayhem.

cstanleytech

(26,233 posts)
7. The national guard not being there or being there does not give people an out for deciding to
Thu May 7, 2015, 12:19 PM
May 2015

behave like assholes and set fire to buildings though.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
9. Of course not, no one is saying that it excuses anyone.
Thu May 7, 2015, 12:55 PM
May 2015

I thought that their presence would have been a deterrence, but it seems that they were there and it still happened.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
3. That's pretty decent of them.
Thu May 7, 2015, 04:04 AM
May 2015

I'm glad that people didn't lose their jobs and that the employees of both stores are temporarily working in other locations. The donated money is quite generous too.

That doesn't excuse those who burned and looted these stores and other buildings in the city.





Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CVS officially confirms p...