CVS officially confirms plan to reopen stores burned in Baltimore riots
Source: Baltimore Sun
The CVS Pharmacy stores looted and burned by rioters in Baltimore last week will be rebuilt, CVS Health formally announced Wednesday.
The firm, which has nearly 30 locations in Baltimore and employs more than 500 people, said it also plans to donate a total of $100,000 to two funds established to help recovery from the riots the United Way of Central Maryland "Maryland Unites Fund" and the Baltimore Community Foundation "Fund for Rebuilding Baltimore."
CVS previously said it was working on rebuilding plans, while the city said the firm had committed to reopening. CVS Health President and CEO Larry Merlo on Wednesday called rebuilding the "right thing to do."
Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-cvs-20150506-story.html
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)cstanleytech
(26,233 posts)as its going to still hurt alot of innocent folks who will end up losing their jobs with companies that decide to just take the insurance money and abandon the area rather than rebuild and risk literally getting burned twice.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)It's not as if the outcome was not predictable. Along with the peaceful protesters there was bound to be an element that would take advantage of the situation to loot and destroy. It happens every single time.
BumRushDaShow
(128,442 posts)they started leaving once the curfew was lifted.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-national-guard-demobilizing-20150504-story.html
Beacool
(30,247 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,442 posts)something like 400+ people were arrested. But as a note, if someone wants to "take" a city the size of Baltimore, you would needs tens of thousands of troops, and that is just ridiculous.
But it seems National Guard weren't needed for these looters in California -
Nothing to see there... just a "headache" and a "disturbance" from "unruly crowds".
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Poor behavior in one place doesn't excuse similar behavior elsewhere.
BumRushDaShow
(128,442 posts)It definitely doesn't excuse the behavior but it precisely illustrates the unequal application of "policing" based on who you are and what you look like, and the linked article's very carefully worded descriptions of what had happened, very obviously downplays the violent "behavior" in that case. And many of us wonder why?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,321 posts)... but there's some waffling about the context of the comment.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/baltimore-unrest/mayor-stephanie-rawlings-blake-under-fire-giving-space-destroy-baltimore-n349656
It would be a reason to hold off the National Guard until the less-than-peaceful people got the looting and arson out of their systems. Sounds like a rope-a-dope strategy.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I don't think that she meant give them freedom to burn and loot. She was probably referring to the peaceful protests. The problem is that these type of protests always seem to devolve into mayhem.
cstanleytech
(26,233 posts)behave like assholes and set fire to buildings though.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I thought that their presence would have been a deterrence, but it seems that they were there and it still happened.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I'm glad that people didn't lose their jobs and that the employees of both stores are temporarily working in other locations. The donated money is quite generous too.
That doesn't excuse those who burned and looted these stores and other buildings in the city.