Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sgt Preston

(133 posts)
Sat May 9, 2015, 12:31 AM May 2015

State Department will not review Clinton ethics pledge breaches

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by TexasTowelie (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - The U.S. State Department will not review the breaches of the 2008 ethics agreement Hillary Clinton signed in order to become secretary of state after her family's charities admitted in March that they had not complied, a spokesman said on Thursday.

Clinton, now the Democratic front-runner in the 2016 presidential election, had promised the federal government that the Clinton Foundation and its associated charities would name all donors annually while she was the nation's top diplomat.

She also promised that the charities would let the State Department's ethics office review beforehand any proposed new foreign governments donations.

In March, the charities confirmed to Reuters for the first time that they had not complied with those pledges for most of Clinton's four years at the State Department.

The State Department "regrets" that it did not get to review the new foreign government funding, but does not plan to look into the matter further, spokesman Jeff Rathke said on Thursday.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/state-dept-not-review-clinton-ethics-pledge-breaches-204846487.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State Department will not review Clinton ethics pledge breaches (Original Post) Sgt Preston May 2015 OP
Quite a bit missing in that paltry article that a thinking person cheapdate May 2015 #1
Here's some more from the article. Larry Engels May 2015 #2
Why would she sign an agreement and then totally blow it off? haikugal May 2015 #3
why don't they review repuke ethics breaches Skittles May 2015 #4
in other words, sweep this under the rug Psephos May 2015 #5
Locking thread. TexasTowelie May 2015 #6

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
1. Quite a bit missing in that paltry article that a thinking person
Sat May 9, 2015, 12:36 AM
May 2015

might want to know.

 

Larry Engels

(387 posts)
2. Here's some more from the article.
Sat May 9, 2015, 12:38 AM
May 2015

"The State Department has not and does not intend to initiate a formal review or to make a retroactive judgment about items that were not submitted during Secretary Clinton's tenure," Rathke told reporters.

The broken ethics agreement has made it harder for Clinton to deflect accusations in recent weeks that foreigners banned from donating to U.S. political campaigns can instead curry favor with her by giving to the charity that bears her name.

The charities accepted new donations from at least six foreign governments while Clinton was secretary of state: Switzerland, Papua New Guinea, Swaziland, Rwanda, Sweden and Algeria.

The governments of Australia and the United Kingdom, which were already funding projects at the time Clinton signed her ethics agreement, increased their funding by millions of dollars during this period.

The charities never told the State Department about the new and increased donations. In two instances, the charities said this was the result of "oversights"; for the other six, they said those donations were exceptions to the agreement for various reasons.

The charities also stopped publishing full donor lists from 2010 onwards; the annually updated list omitted donors to the foundation's flagship health initiative.

http://news.yahoo.com/state-dept-not-review-clinton-ethics-pledge-breaches-204846487.html

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
3. Why would she sign an agreement and then totally blow it off?
Sat May 9, 2015, 12:50 AM
May 2015

WTF...and there will be no accountability, of course not....after all who cares right? What is this..

Skittles

(170,256 posts)
4. why don't they review repuke ethics breaches
Sat May 9, 2015, 01:55 AM
May 2015

Psephos

(8,032 posts)
5. in other words, sweep this under the rug
Sat May 9, 2015, 02:02 AM
May 2015

The message from doing that is that corruption will not be investigated, because apologists can always say it's canceled out by someone else's wrongdoing.

That's an open invitation for more corruption, not less.

TexasTowelie

(126,311 posts)
6. Locking thread.
Sat May 9, 2015, 02:04 AM
May 2015

Statement of Purpose

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.

This story was published on May 7 at 6:19 p.m. CDT, thus it does not meet the requirement for being published within the past 12 hours.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»State Department will not...