Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,618 posts)
Mon May 11, 2015, 11:36 PM May 2015

Suit: City owes Amtrak, Union Station more than $500,000 for viaduct repairs

Source: Chicago Sun Times

The City of Chicago welshed on its obligation to maintain the Canal Street Viaduct near Union Station, costing the commuting hub and Amtrak more than $500,000 to inspect the area and remove broken concrete, a new lawsuit alleges.

The lawsuit was filed Monday in U.S. District Court by the parent companies of Amtrak and Union Station and alleges that the city assumed responsibility for maintaining the viaduct in 1980.

“The city has failed to properly maintain the Canal Street Viaduct, leading to spalling concrete on its undersurfaces,” the suit stated.

Union Station was responsible for the upkeep from 1914 until 1980, when the train station and the city entered into a new agreement that shifted responsibility to the city, the suit stated.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://chicago.suntimes.com/news-chicago/7/71/597642/suit-city-owes-amtrak-union-station-500000-viaduct-repairs

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Suit: City owes Amtrak, Union Station more than $500,000 for viaduct repairs (Original Post) Omaha Steve May 2015 OP
I'm curious why the Chicago Sun Times decided to use a racist slur. DRoseDARs May 2015 #1
They were mad because it takes up too many column inches to publish names like this: Ken Burch May 2015 #2
LMAO! Travelman May 2015 #3
I think they created those spellings Ken Burch May 2015 #5
I wondered about that as well alcina May 2015 #6
Should be fairly straightforward Travelman May 2015 #4
 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
1. I'm curious why the Chicago Sun Times decided to use a racist slur.
Tue May 12, 2015, 12:19 AM
May 2015

Welshed? What, was using "jewed" or "gyped" too passé?

alcina

(602 posts)
6. I wondered about that as well
Tue May 12, 2015, 07:57 AM
May 2015

When I was working as an editor, that was definitely on the list of prohibited words. But perhaps they've done away with editors and style guides. Quite a lot of people have no idea about the origins of these terms.

Travelman

(708 posts)
4. Should be fairly straightforward
Tue May 12, 2015, 02:30 AM
May 2015

Either the contract says that the city is responsible for it or it doesn't.

That having been said, half a mil for inspection and (apparently relatively moderate) repair of a major viaduct that presumably hasn't been touched for thirty-five years ( )is pretty darn cheap in the grand scheme of things. $14,685 per year for inspections and upkeep by ASE engineers and (presumably) high-quality union workers is a drop in the bucket of a budget for Chicago.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Suit: City owes Amtrak, U...