Boy Scouts’ President Calls for End to Ban on Gay Leaders
Source: The New York Times
At the same time, religious organizations that sponsor a majority of local Scout troops, including the Mormons and Roman Catholics, should remain free to set their own policies for leaders, said the president, Robert M. Gates, the former director of the C.I.A. and the former secretary of defense.
Mr. Gates called for the changes at an annual national meeting of the group, in Atlanta. He said that he was not yet making a formal proposal but that the Scouts governing body should take up the issue formally at a future meeting.
The treatment of gay men and boys has been a source of wrenching debate over the last decade. Conservative religious groups that sponsor many Scout troops, including the Mormon Church and the Roman Catholic Church, have opposed the participation of openly gay members while local leaders in more liberal areas have called for an end to the ban.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/us/boy-scouts-president-calls-for-end-to-ban-on-gay-leaders.html
But we can still kick out the atheists?
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)Outstanding scouts who are gay grow up to be outstanding scout leaders who are gay.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Ugh. That phrasing:
Yes, thanks for reminding us all you don't want us.
Screw the scouts. I'm tired of their bigotry. Easily the most homophobic, racist, and sexist group I've ever been a part of. And, of course, very anti-atheist.
Sucks, thinking about how many people are harmed by these policies every year.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)I didn't know Gates landed there. He was the Defense Sec. when DADT was repealed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_ask,_don't_tell
Hekate
(90,633 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Of same sex marriages it will be shorter. I am sure there will be some holdouts but it will be sticks in the mud.
Maven
(10,533 posts)Translation: we all wish these queers would just go away, but we have to face the fact that despite our efforts they actually have some political clout now, so to prevent more doors closing on us and the courts intervening let's change our policy, but you religious members can still exercise your freedom (wink wink)
Barf.
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)He was speaking for a bigoted organization that he leads. The majority of the members of that organization are bigots.
He seems to be trying to change it from the inside, so naturally, he has to include himself in his statements.
If he had used the words "you" and "your organization," he would have made himself seem like an outsider accusing them of bigotry, and he would have become a target.
His only chance of dragging the Boy Scouts into the 21st century is to be seen as their friend. I want him to be successful, because I think it's a great program once the religious nuttery is removed. (My son's troop puts absolutely no emphasis on religion; any requirements for religious activity can be signed off by the parents.)
The Girl Scouts are also (indirectly) putting pressure on the Boy Scouts, too. They now have internal and external pressure on them to change, and I hope they will finally become more accepting.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)FSogol
(45,470 posts)gay scouts was made following polling leaders and parents registered with units across the country. The biggest no vote came from Mormon troops. The pressure to change is coming from inside, but also from corporations that help fund scouting (Merck, UPS, Intel, Levi-Strauss) not from the Girls Scouts of America.
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)It was well-publicized that the majority of the national leadership was resistant to the changes they were making, and they did state that losing corporate sponsorship was a driving force behind those changes.
The national leadership did not just magically appear in those positions of power. They were put there by the state and local councils. If the local councils and parents were so open to allowing gay youth, how did the bigots rise to, and retain, power?
As I said, the Girl Scouts are indirectly applying pressure by already being open and accepting. No big public arguments from them. Just, "Here is our policy. Deal with it."
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)Taking it in context, he's speaking FOR the organization he leads, not about his own personal beliefs whatever they may be.
For me, I agree scouting is a really good program. My scouting experience was nothing but positive -- no gay-bashing, no overt religiosity -- and the troop was sponsored by a local church. The only religious things I recall from our activities was the bit in the oath about doing one's duty "to God and my country" and I think we said grace before meals and a prayer before meetings or events -- much the same as many civic organizations would do. Other than that, it was camping and games and outdoor learning, practicing kindness, fairness, citizenship, community involvement, etc. -- just scouting stuff.
==========================
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Aw.....it's so sad that Hitler's regime is dead, isn't it?
Stuff your words, Gates.
Gore1FL
(21,126 posts)The rule is a self-defeating loophole.
The idea that God is an oversized white male with a flowing beard, who sits in the sky and tallies the fall of every sparrow is ludicrous. But if by 'God,' one means the set of physical laws that govern the universe, then clearly there is such a God. This God is emotionally unsatisfying... it does not make much sense to pray to the law of gravity.
--Carl Sagan.
That's how I "reverented*" for 7 years.
Most Scout Leaders I knew really didn't understand what "reverent" really meant. It always got over-simplified into "going to church."
FSogol
(45,470 posts)personal matter and I'm not sure I have all the answers" is fine.
Glad BSA is improving.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)step by step progress is made.