Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,450 posts)
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:31 PM May 2015

California governor pitches amnesty on traffic debt for poor

Source: Associated Press

California governor pitches amnesty on traffic debt for poor

By JUDY LIN, Associated Press | May 23, 2015 | Updated: May 23, 2015 11:00am

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Calling California's traffic court system a "hellhole of desperation" for the poor, Gov. Jerry Brown is proposing an amnesty program for residents who can't afford to pay off spiraling fines and penalties that have resulted in 4.8 million driver's license suspensions since 2006.

The push by the Democratic governor spotlights concern among lawmakers and court administrators that California's justice system is profiting off minorities and low-income residents. It's a civil rights issue that has prompted discussions between the Brown administration and the U.S. Department of Justice, according to the governor's spokesman, Evan Westrup.

. . .

Under Brown's plan, drivers with lesser infractions would pay half of what they owe, and administrative fees would be slashed from $300 to $50.

Advocates for the poor have likened California's problem to the police and municipal court structure in Ferguson, Missouri, which was criticized by the Justice Department as a revenue-generating machine following last year's fatal shooting of Michael Brown by a police officer.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/California-governor-pitches-amnesty-on-traffic-6282841.php

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California governor pitches amnesty on traffic debt for poor (Original Post) Judi Lynn May 2015 OP
A lot of cities like San Ramon consider traffic is profit center cosmicone May 2015 #1
An absolutely pivotal point. Joe Chi Minh May 2015 #9
I am very glad to hear that. I had suggested that Furguson MO should do that as most of their jwirr May 2015 #2
They should change the fines so its a % of a persons gross income which imo is far more fair. nt cstanleytech May 2015 #3
So you want to base it off of gross income Big_Mike May 2015 #5
Something similar is done in Sweden. cstanleytech May 2015 #6
It's not a matter of people christx30 May 2015 #12
K&R freshwest May 2015 #4
K & R historylovr May 2015 #7
K & R Joe Shlabotnik May 2015 #8
I hope this passes--the current system is corrupt cally May 2015 #10
K&R Starry Messenger May 2015 #11
gov brown trying to repeal rafeh1 May 2015 #13
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
1. A lot of cities like San Ramon consider traffic is profit center
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:54 PM
May 2015

San Ramon (population 50,000) has more cops per capita than Oakland and only a 1/20th crime rate. All these cops also get OT for attending court when someone challenges a traffic ticket.

No wonder San Ramon's city manager is paid more than the city managers of San Francisco and San Jose.

The cities that issue tickets should not get a dime of the fines and fees - period. It is a major conflict of interest.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
2. I am very glad to hear that. I had suggested that Furguson MO should do that as most of their
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:11 PM
May 2015

fines that are overdue are because of the harassment of the people there.

Big_Mike

(509 posts)
5. So you want to base it off of gross income
Sat May 23, 2015, 11:20 PM
May 2015

What are you going to do, make them bring in their 1040? That makes their taxes PUBLIC documents. No, it ain't gonna happen.

How about families like mine, where I make good money, but pay over 35% of my income for my terminally ill wife's medical bills? You going to add to that burden?

This is a bad idea, with only bad outcomes possible.

If you don't want big bills in traffic court, follow the damn laws!

cstanleytech

(26,229 posts)
6. Something similar is done in Sweden.
Sat May 23, 2015, 11:27 PM
May 2015
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/multimillionaire-faces-130-000-speeding-ticket-article-1.1486072
What it means is those who earn very little pay enough that it stings a bit so as to discourage them from doing it again but its not enough to cripple them since its based on their wealth and those that earn alot pay alot more of course but like the person who is poor its enough of a sting so hopefully they wont do it again.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
12. It's not a matter of people
Sun May 24, 2015, 10:21 AM
May 2015

choosing not to follow the law. It's usually a matter of a mistake that lands you in a world of hurt. A $50 fine plus a $300 administration fee can wreck someone's while budget.
If A few years ago, I was supplementing my income delivering newspapers. I'll get about $500 a month minus gas. I would do 10 hours per night at my day job, followed by 3 to 4 hours doing the newspaper thing. Suffice it to say I was tired all the time.
So I accidently failed to yield in a dark side street at 3am. Was trying to get done with my route as fast as I could, so I could get 5 hours of sleep instead of 4 1/2. It was seen by a pig who stopped me, issued me a ticket, and erased all hope of making any money that month so I could take care of my family. And because I was under a contract, I couldn't just quit. I finished the last 3 weeks of that month as a volunteer for the Dallas morning news.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California governor pitch...