Dennis Hastert paid to conceal sexual misconduct, sources say
Source: LA Times
Indicted former House Speaker Dennis Hastert was paying an individual from his past to conceal sexual misconduct, two federal law enforcement officials said Friday.
One of the officials, who would not speak publicly about the federal charges in Chicago, said Individual A, as the person is described in Thursdays federal indictment, was a man and that the alleged misconduct was unrelated to Hasterts tenure in Congress. The actions date to Hasterts time as a Yorkville, Ill., high school wrestling coach and teacher, the official said.
It goes back a long way, back to then, the source said. It has nothing to do with public corruption or a corruption scandal. Or to his time in office. Thursdays indictment described the misconduct against Individual A as having occurred years earlier.
Asked why Hastert was making the payments, the official said it was to conceal Hasterts past relationship with the male. It was sex, the source said. The other official confirmed that the misconduct involved sexual abuse.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-hastert-misconduct-20150529-story.html
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,495 posts)ananda
(35,496 posts)Geez
Major Nikon
(36,927 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)But unless the victim had not progressed beyond Tanner Stage 2 (prepubescent), it wasn't within the range of behaviors indicative of pedophilia. Anyway, you can't diagnose pedophilia from behavior alone. Some sickos have other reasons for molesting children.
Major Nikon
(36,927 posts)At this point Hastert appears to be another Sandusky, although he may have preferred older victims.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)However, I would take the opposite side of that bet.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)So I would assume pedophilia and statutory rape.
He always was a slimy guy, so this doesn't surprise me, at all.
The only other thing it could have been would have been taking bribes re: Turkey.
Baitball Blogger
(52,713 posts)Hoppy
(3,595 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,937 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)over it.
cstanleytech
(28,588 posts)he wouldnt be the first politician that swung both ways that then wanted to cover it up.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)"misconduct", which is how the anonymous source termed it. Most likely was sexual abuse of a male minor and since the statute of limitations is long gone, it's being labeled misconduct.
cstanleytech
(28,588 posts)intern who was at the school trying to get their teachers certificate for example.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)But I can't see Hastert, or anyone, paying 3.5 mil for something that was simply a termination of employment offense. Now sexual relations with a minor...yeah that I can see him paying up for all these years later because that type of misconduct, while not prosecutable any more, would have meant (and now is) his political and social death.
cstanleytech
(28,588 posts)of him and Hastert having sex.
After all claims are one thing and Hastert could recover from that in time if it was revealed but actual video of Hastert doing the deed as it were would kill any potential career he might have as a lobbyist unless it was for the porn industry.
merrily
(45,251 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)blue neen
(12,465 posts)It seems like they're everywhere.
peecoolyour
(336 posts)gopiscrap
(24,778 posts)it is pervasive in their culture as repugs!
hamsterjill
(17,745 posts)It's like being some kind of sexual deviant is a requirement to belong to the inner circle of the party!
LuvNewcastle
(17,911 posts)so we should, too.
Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)They all seem to be crooked in one way or another.
gopiscrap
(24,778 posts)Welcome to DU!!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)If there's a story, she should know about it.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)"Reaching out in Illinois" is probably how this whole mess started
murielm99
(33,082 posts)Look at his relationship with his top aide. Notice that his wife seldom came to D.C.
I am wondering why it is news now. The real news should have been the Sibil Edmonds story.
Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)...who have been charged with corruption over the years. That list of course includes convicted felons like Rod Blagojevich, George Ryan, etc.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)he was being blackmailed by the victim AND other(s?) who found out about it. I could be wrong...
gvstn
(2,805 posts)Considering how much money was involved. The FBI could have found person B because they were following/watching person A to see what he was doing with the cash (possibly distributing it).
Hastert could have just let the chips fall where they may since he was out of politics. There would be no investigation of a 35 year old crime. Not even civil suits can be filed over it unless I'm mistaken or that state has no statute of limitations for that crime.
If he got fired who cares. He is 73 and obviously has at least $3.7 million.
Newsjock
(11,733 posts)"The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy."
(I know, he wasn't the one who said this. But still.)
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Makes your nemesis Bill Clinton's thing with Monica look tame by comparison, eh, Denny Boy?
calimary
(90,755 posts)I was tempted to use the ROFL smilie, at least regarding the irony in my reply title. But considering there's a victim here, it's no laughing matter.
He always looked like a huge walking, talking case of constipation, at least to me.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)They're not only screwing us, they're screwing each other.
erronis
(24,511 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)Jeez.
Baitball Blogger
(52,713 posts)Because that person will be susceptible to blackmail and will need to come up with large cashflows to keep the secret quiet. Or, worse.
Backwoodsrider
(764 posts)Even though he was a hardcore repub speaker. I hope people wise up and see Fox News for what it is, a right wing propaganda tool like the Nazis used did in WWII. I for one am not going to sugar coat it. Somebody starts quoting Fox news(haha news!) I am going to remind them Fox targets the uneducated for a reason....
cstanleytech
(28,588 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Not that I'm sad that Hastert is indicted...... Just wondering if the crime of blackmail is going to get the other person the way the coverup got him?
bluedigger
(17,449 posts)The best way to bring in a big fish is with a smaller one.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)gvstn
(2,805 posts)The prosecutor uses specific language that makes it sound like a business deal not blackmail (I believe this was intentional to signal no blackmail charges.)
~The defendent agreed to provide individual A, $3.5 million in order to compensate for and conceal his previous past misdeeds against individual A.~
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Earlier reports said that he Hastert stopped paying. If he stopped paying long enough ago, the statute of limitations may have run out.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)If the person asks for the money and they can prove it.
Usually what happens is that the person being blackmailed goes to the police first and the police set up a sting where they record the guy asking for the money. If they don't have that, they don't have a case.
obnoxiousdrunk
(3,118 posts)during Heavy D's term was Tom the bug man.
erronis
(24,511 posts)But first, make him name/verify everyone who used his "services". I would imagine Rove, Norquist, most lobbyists have been serviced by and serviced him.
Careful - these people control most of the apparatus and most of the wealth around DC, and increasingly in the states. They are not amused by these discussions.
Fearless
(18,458 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)So there's the possibility we could see this unleash a Cosby-like avalanche of accusations.
And with hush money in the milllions and millions of dollars, there must have been some "misconduct."
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)Last edited Fri May 29, 2015, 04:46 PM - Edit history (1)
Do you think this one will get a lot of say from the other Evangelical Christians?.
Condemnation or more attempts to save his soul..
.the poor fellow had to pay out all that ..hush money..
Poor fellow, he needs to be saved, not condemned....they will say..
But he lied..
didn't he?..to the FBI?..What do you think of that??
irisblue
(37,915 posts)Bisexual(?) in a mean nasty closet.
erronis
(24,511 posts)peecoolyour
(336 posts)YES on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage
YES on Constitutionally defining marriage as one-man-one-woman
NO on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation
Supports anti-flag desecration amendment
Supports requiring schools to allow prayer
Rated 92% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-Family-Value voting record
Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer
YES on giving federal aid only to schools allowing voluntary prayer
http://www.ontheissues.org/IL/Denny_Hastert.htm
rocktivity
(45,008 posts)Ocotber 2006:
(PDF): The Sexually Explicit Internet Messages That Led to Fla. Rep. Foley's Resignation
Hastert afraid to report Foley for fear of being seen as homophobic
Hastert Fights to Save His Job in Page Scandal
AP has a list of Repuke "excuses" for Foley's not being fired earlier
GOP House leaders call for criminal investigation of Foley
Posted by Rocktivity:
10/1/2006: ...(Rocktivity) calls for criminal investigation of GOP House leaders since at least two of them can charged as acessories. There is now also a matter of a six-figure contribution Foley made to one of the leaders who was told about the e-mails--hush money?
10/4/2006: I want to see when Foley gave Reynold's comittee $100,000, though I've also heard it could be as high as $350,000. Are such amounts normal?
rocktivity
Renew Deal
(85,349 posts)If not, why not?
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Unless they have something in writing or a recording of the guy asking for money, they don't have a case. Maybe Hastert just offered the money without being asked.
Renew Deal
(85,349 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)AlinPA
(15,071 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Rated 92% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-Family-Value voting record.
Hastert scores 92% by the Christian Coalition on family issues
The Christian Coalition was founded in 1989 by Dr. Pat Robertson to give Christians a voice in government. We represent millions of people of faith and enable them to have a strong, unified voice in the conversation we call democracy.
Our Five-Fold Mission:
Represent the pro-family point of view before local councils, school boards, state legislatures, and Congress
Speak out in the public arena and in the media
Train leaders for effective social and political action
Inform pro-family voters about timely issues and legislation
Protest anti-Christian bigotry and defend the rights of people of faith.
Our ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Source: CC website 03n-CC on Dec 31, 2003
cstanleytech
(28,588 posts)Person 2713
(3,263 posts)IggleDoer
(1,186 posts)What will we tell the children?
still_one
(98,883 posts)involved in sexual misconduct, and if the person was a minor, then it is even more damning
FarPoint
(14,938 posts)If I'm collecting the trail of facts....So, why the big pay off now if all was silent since 1981? Was there payoff given in 1981 and forward during his political career? If not, why pay now?
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)that does not prove he was not paying all the time he was in politics
SaveOurDemocracy
(4,567 posts)President Clinton does this make now?
Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)Gingrich, Hyde, and Livingston are the three I can think of off the top of my head. Any I'm forgetting?
winstars
(4,282 posts)BumRushDaShow
(172,196 posts)LawnKorn
(1,137 posts)I want to see Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the whole slimy lot of them on trial.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Dick Cheney's abuse victims probably don't live long enough to collect blackmail ....
Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)I mention below that I predicted they would get Hastert on something years ago. Granted, I made a lot of predictions that didn't come true. But a few I did get right. Karma works in weird ways.
TexasBushwhacker
(21,283 posts)from when he was a coach.
truthisfreedom
(23,542 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)I'll bet that worked like Astroglide in a masturbation cessation course.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)I felt a little frustrated this a.m. to read that Hastert's attorneys negotiated with the FBI to not state what he had allegedly done and was trying to hide but I knew it would come out anyway. I just didn't expect to be reading about it just a couple hours later!
I figured it was either a love child with an underage female or sex with an underage male. I was expecting the latter since Hastert had been a wrestling coach. The Family Values crowd never ceases to amaze.
Response to peecoolyour (Original post)
aint_no_life_nowhere This message was self-deleted by its author.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)...that at some point, they would get Hastert on something. It was around the time when those revelations from Sibel Edmonds about his connections with the Turkish officials came out. Rachel Maddow talked about that on her show last night.
So one of my prophecies came true. Feels like it's at least 10 years late, but it happened nonetheless. Seems like a lot of dirt about his past misdeeds is going to start coming to light.