Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 09:57 PM Dec 2011

Scientists test sick Alaska seals for radiation

Reuters - updated 2 hours 19 minutes ago 2011-12-28T00:35:49


SEATTLE — Scientists in Alaska are investigating whether local seals are being sickened by radiation from Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear plant.

Scores of ring seals have washed up on Alaska's Arctic coastline since July, suffering or killed by a mysterious disease marked by bleeding lesions on the hind flippers, irritated skin around the nose and eyes and patchy hair loss on the animals' fur coats.

Biologists at first thought the seals were suffering from a virus, but they have so far been unable to identify one, and tests are now underway to find out if radiation is a factor.

"We recently received samples of seal tissue from diseased animals captured near St. Lawrence Island with a request to examine the material for radioactivity," said John Kelley, Professor Emeritus at the Institute of Marine Science at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45800485/ns/technology_and_science-science/

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scientists test sick Alaska seals for radiation (Original Post) IDemo Dec 2011 OP
How sad Politicalboi Dec 2011 #1
Very doubtful. TheWraith Dec 2011 #8
wow you're certainly very knowledgeable for having never even seen one of the seals wordpix Dec 2011 #9
Amazing, isn't it? Purports to know all there is to know sans most pertinent facts. Doremus Dec 2011 #12
Especially when our government has been LYING... CoffeeCat Dec 2011 #44
Not quite. That milk warning was only for youngsters and expectant mothers, not "all Europeans". uppityperson Dec 2011 #46
I understand what you are saying... CoffeeCat Dec 2011 #50
It's called understanding science. TheWraith Dec 2011 #15
and you also know the migration habits of these seals? You're an expert on where they were before wordpix Dec 2011 #19
So minor was the release of radioactive materials that Obama ordered the EPA to cease monitoring. Citizen Worker Dec 2011 #35
Yes, no one talks about this any more... CoffeeCat Dec 2011 #45
Yes....interesting, no? PearliePoo2 Dec 2011 #51
O has done plenty wrong including wanting taxpayers to guarantee loans for new nukes@ $36 billion wordpix Dec 2011 #49
when you understand science, you know you have to investigate a question, not jump to conclusions wordpix Dec 2011 #54
This same exact story broke within days of Fukushima, regarding a different species on the west coas AtheistCrusader Dec 2011 #31
That isn't the way it happened kristopher Dec 2011 #36
They were littoral fish. AtheistCrusader Dec 2011 #37
Yes, please do so. kristopher Dec 2011 #47
I take that back. AtheistCrusader Dec 2011 #48
go to enenews.com uncleroy Dec 2011 #10
read "Nuclear Roulette: The Case Against a Nuclear Renaissance" & maybe wordpix Dec 2011 #13
Enenews isn't an energy news website. It's a pseudoscience website. TheWraith Dec 2011 #16
All links to mainstream news reports... strange you can't deal with facts eom amerfayed Dec 2011 #23
By "mainstream" do you mean "corporate mainstream", or "mainstream outside the US corporate sphere"? saras Dec 2011 #43
I am not personally attacking you, dotymed Dec 2011 #25
K&R... stonecutter357 Dec 2011 #27
I would direct you; greiner3 Dec 2011 #33
The plant has been shut down for months?? PearliePoo2 Dec 2011 #34
mistake you're making is assuming "ambient" radiation levels preclude hot spots of higher levels` CreekDog Dec 2011 #42
Let us know when the results come in. Trillo Dec 2011 #2
sound like radiation poisoning to me FirstLight Dec 2011 #3
Eat fish at your peril! Hawkowl Dec 2011 #4
Unfortunately, I gave up seafood dotymed Dec 2011 #26
NPR, Talk of the Nation today, reports US agency is now approving a newly engineered nuc. plant. jerseyjack Dec 2011 #5
"It's not only safe, it's cheap, too" as long as taxpayers guarantee construction loans, build waste wordpix Dec 2011 #11
Poor things. lonestarnot Dec 2011 #6
It's horrible. freshwest Dec 2011 #7
the entire planet is dying wordpix Dec 2011 #14
HOPI Prophecies- akin to SO many other indigenous peoples prophecies. BeHereNow Dec 2011 #20
nice video, thanks wordpix Dec 2011 #29
+1 zeemike Dec 2011 #40
There are other segments from the Elders on Youtube BeHereNow Dec 2011 #53
Please repost when the results come back. Thanks IDemo! n/t SunSeeker Dec 2011 #17
Yes. Please post. This makes me cry. glinda Dec 2011 #18
K&R DeSwiss Dec 2011 #21
Could be burrowowl Dec 2011 #22
ah, yes, the NRC, that bastion of foxes guarding the nuclear henhouse wordpix Dec 2011 #28
Ask Dr. Kelley --WTF is Going On with these seals!!! solarman350 Dec 2011 #24
as i understand it, uncleroy Dec 2011 #30
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2011 #32
Could Fukushima plant be sickening, killing ringed seals in Alaska? Judi Lynn Dec 2011 #38
That really sucks... joeybee12 Dec 2011 #39
Children, too, as with war. closeupready Dec 2011 #41
Glad to see at least some sort of testing for Fukushima radiation over here. Overseas Dec 2011 #52

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
8. Very doubtful.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:44 AM
Dec 2011

The amount of radiation released by Fukushima is small even at the point of release, before crossing an ocean, and the plant has been more or less shut down for months.

Most likely, there's simply some sort of virus they haven't been able to ID, or possibly a parasite infection such as the one that causes mange.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
9. wow you're certainly very knowledgeable for having never even seen one of the seals
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:50 AM
Dec 2011

not to mention, you're SURE Fuku couldn't have caused the massive radiation from the meltdown we all saw (if we were reading and watching the reports).

Just wondering, what nuke plant you're working for or maybe you're an industry apologist?

"It's perfectly safe" after the Fuku disaster just doesn't cut it, buddy.

Doremus

(7,273 posts)
12. Amazing, isn't it? Purports to know all there is to know sans most pertinent facts.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:58 AM
Dec 2011

But he just *knows* it could NEVER be radiation poisoning, no matter what!

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
44. Especially when our government has been LYING...
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 06:38 PM
Dec 2011

...and lying by omission.

The French authority on radiation issued a warning to all Europeans, to not eat leafy
greens or drink milk--due to high levels of radiation that was found in these foods.

That warning was issued back in April!

And to make matters worse--radiation levels in both milk and leafy greens were found
to be even higher than in Europe.

Europe got warnings several months ago. The United States got nothing.

Anyone who suggests that the radiation levels are just fine and dandy are living
in a fantasy world where our government is honest and loves each and every
one of us so dearly.

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)
46. Not quite. That milk warning was only for youngsters and expectant mothers, not "all Europeans".
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 06:47 PM
Dec 2011

It is bad enough, no need to try and make it worse by posting inaccurate information.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
50. I understand what you are saying...
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 09:49 PM
Dec 2011

...and you are right--the warning for Europeans was for pregnant women and for very young children. However, those warnings indicate that radiation levels were dangerous. Even though the warnings weren't for the general population, it is still a concern for the general population because anyone can consume a great deal of radiation--due the cumulative effect.

If you drink a lot of milk or eat a lot of leafy greens, that would raise your levels. Some of these isotopes stay in the body for decades. I understand that the warnings were for the groups that you mentioned, but many researchers indicate that NO AMOUNT of these hot particles are safe to have in your body. These particles nestle in our thyroids and cause cancer and they stay for prolonged periods. So, this leaves the general population vulnerable too.

Also--the levels of radiation after the French research group issued that warning--have only exacerbated. Radiation evels in America were even higher than in Europe--and our country
received NO warning for anyone--not pregnant women, not children. But Europeans got those
warnings--with lower levels that we had.

I'd say that the concern is that we are getting no help. We're getting cover ups. So truly--how
can we know the level of danger in which we truly find ourselves? That's frightening, in itself.

Your point is well taken, and I should have clarified that the warning was for specific groups. However, I will also say that while those warnings were for babies and pregnant women--that
does not mean that people outside of those groups were not in danger.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
15. It's called understanding science.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:00 AM
Dec 2011

You clearly don't, if you think that you can judge a situation from TV reports. I know what a measurable dose is, what a dangerous dose is, and I understand radioactive decay. I also know that the microscopic amount of radiation that was measurable in North America for only a few weeks after the disaster was barely enough to register, not nearly enough to produce any actual harm.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
19. and you also know the migration habits of these seals? You're an expert on where they were before
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:24 AM
Dec 2011

they washed up in AK?

Your jumping to conclusions based on your knowledge of radiation does not make you look smarter than scientists investigating whether or not the seals have radiation poisoning.

Citizen Worker

(1,785 posts)
35. So minor was the release of radioactive materials that Obama ordered the EPA to cease monitoring.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 02:54 PM
Dec 2011

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
45. Yes, no one talks about this any more...
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 06:41 PM
Dec 2011

Radiation levels were high. We found Iodine 131 and Cesium in our milk supply
and were were also finding isotopes in vegetables and fruits--as well as in our drinking
supply.

Suddenly, the government decides--in the middle of a Chernobyl-level meltdown--that
the EPA doesn't needs to release radioactive particle levels anymore. Despite the fact
that we had been doing them as routine for years.

We found harmful levels of isotopes months ago. What has happened during the past
several months, when these harmful isotopes have continued to be released from
Fukushima--and accumulate everywhere? It's not good, that's for sure.

The cover up has been despicable.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
51. Yes....interesting, no?
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:06 PM
Dec 2011

Nearby where I live, Sidney BC initially showed radiation readings. Scientists studying the coast of Vancouver Island found seaweed that was hot.
Now...NOTHING.
I guess its all gone away....um...bullshit.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
49. O has done plenty wrong including wanting taxpayers to guarantee loans for new nukes@ $36 billion
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 08:56 PM
Dec 2011

mainly because investors don't think they're viable to build and operate with all the uncertainties, financial included. So the fact O shut down EPA monitoring is not surprising and just one more reason I'm not giving to his campaign until I hear a different story from him on the environment.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
54. when you understand science, you know you have to investigate a question, not jump to conclusions
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 01:03 PM
Dec 2011

You have concluded there is NO WAY the seals have died or become ill due to radiation sickness, without even looking at one seal, at the start of an investigation where experts are examining the seals but have not yet concluded anything.

So who is not knowledgeable about testing a hypothesis and scientific inquiry here?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
31. This same exact story broke within days of Fukushima, regarding a different species on the west coas
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:07 PM
Dec 2011

t, and of course, the reactors were blamed, despite the complete lack of material that had arrived, and the physical distance the fish could not have traversed in the period of time available.

So yeah, I'm pretty skeptical that this has anything to do with the reactors.

Not ruling out human activity though. We dump plenty of awful shit into that ocean, all around.
If the autopsies don't show what you are expecting, you'll never know because it just won't get reported.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
36. That isn't the way it happened
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 03:08 PM
Dec 2011

The reactors were not "blamed", but the suggestion to check for radiation was raised. Since the "evidence" against a contaminated food supply was addressed no better in that instance than it has been in this one, your citation is disingenuous at best.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
37. They were littoral fish.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 03:15 PM
Dec 2011

They didn't go anywhere. They didn't feed on anything that had the speed and range to get here from there. The tests were done, it was a biological source, not radiological.

We've also since tested far-ranging migratory fish like Salmon. http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/news/environment/20418-west-coast-fish-to-be-tested-for-fukushima-radiation.html

Nothing exciting to report in 3 months.

Disingenuous my ass. Shall I post the DU2 thread where it was plainly assumed by many posters that Fukushima HAD to be responsible?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
48. I take that back.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 08:24 PM
Dec 2011

It was YOU, and you suggested fukushima should be the first cause investigated.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x294262#294588

Nevermind they were littoral fish, little to no exposure, and were dying like that before the reactors were damaged in the first place.
Of course, you stopped responding when that was brought up.

 

uncleroy

(16 posts)
10. go to enenews.com
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:54 AM
Dec 2011

that s not a typo; it s an energy news site you might be better informed...

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
13. read "Nuclear Roulette: The Case Against a Nuclear Renaissance" & maybe
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:58 AM
Dec 2011

YOU"LL get informed.

I've got enough information, thank you.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
16. Enenews isn't an energy news website. It's a pseudoscience website.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:01 AM
Dec 2011

It reports a lot of "news" which isn't actually true. If that's where you get your news, I can understand why you'd think that way.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
43. By "mainstream" do you mean "corporate mainstream", or "mainstream outside the US corporate sphere"?
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 06:12 PM
Dec 2011

They are, after all, mutually exclusive. We don't HAVE any "mainstream" news outlets any more, for example. They've all, of necessity, chosen sides.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
25. I am not personally attacking you,
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:44 AM
Dec 2011

I do find it interesting that your wide array of knowledge over so many subjects, always leads you to the same conclusion. "All is right as it is" seems to be your conclusion, no matter what the subject is.
Do you by any chance belong to a "think-tank" where ALL of the issues are discussed and explained?
There are few posters who seem to KNOW ALL of the answers, yet you seem to fit that niche. Surprisingly(?) your knowledge always suggests that there is absolutely nothing to worry about within the status quo.
Just an observation.
I would prefer to stay on subject...

 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
33. I would direct you;
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:41 PM
Dec 2011

To fairewinds.com and in particular Arnie Gunderson's videos. He is about the premier expert in nuclear plants; in the world. He disagrees with your premise, conclusion and alternatives. He has put out almost a weekly update on the disaster at Fukishima. He is saying that one of the destroyed reactors has NEARLY done the unthinkable; CHINA SYNDROME. If you have not heard of this term, it was made famous in the Jane Fonda/Jack Lemmon movie about a nuclear plant that NEARLY had its core melt down and begin its way to, China. This is a euphemism. Of course it would not go further than the Mantle. This begins about 30 miles deep. However, there are papers that say the pressure at this point in the Earth's interior is so great that molten magma would shoot up through the resultant hole in the ground. I think you have heard of volcanoes. Anyway, the reactors have not had a complete meltdown yet. However, the radiation clouds are known to have drifted over the Continental US.

Also check out Dr. Michio Kaku (website URL http://mkaku.org/). He is also on vast amounts of YouTube videos where he gives EXPERT insight into the problems of Fukishima. His EXPERT analysis shows that radiation HAS leaked into the ground water in massive amounts and that this in turn has emptied into the Pacific.

From a Wiki article; "Ringed seals have a circumpolar distribution from approximately 35°N to the North Pole, occurring in all seas of the Arctic Ocean. In the North Pacific, they are found in the southern Bering Sea and range as far south as the Seas of Okhotsk and Japan. Throughout their range, ringed seals have an affinity for ice-covered waters and are well adapted to occupying seasonal and permanent ice. They tend to prefer large floes (i.e., > 48 m in diameter) and are often found in the interior ice pack where the sea ice coverage is greater than 90%. They remain in contact with ice most of the year and pup on the ice in late winter-early spring.[7]"

And; "Ringed seals eat a wide variety of small prey that consists of 72 species of fish and invertebrates. Feeding is usually a solitary behavior and their prey of choice includes mysids, shrimp, arctic cod, and herring. While feeding, ringed seals dive to depths of 35 to 150 ft (10–45 m).[4] In the summer ringed seals feed along edge of the sea-ice for polar cod. In shallow water they feed on smaller cod. Ringed seals may also eat herring, smelt, whitefish, sculpin, perch, and crustaceans."

&feature=related is a URL from NASA. It shows the world's ocean currents. A large northern Pacific cold water current is shown flowing from the Japanese islands flowing DIRECTLY to the southern coast of Alaska. It then turns north along the Alaskan coast and goes into the Arctic Ocean.
There is one more thing I think I need to mention; Walruses are also turning up dead from pretty much the same ailments. I think you have heard of a food chain. This is where some animals eat plants and these in turn are eaten by smallish predators who in turn are eaten by larger predators until you come to the 'lion in the ecosystem,' in this case the walruses who's main diet, in certain times of the year anyway, is ring seals.

In this ecosystem first the plankton becomes radiated which is eaten by 'vegetarian' fish. Seals eat at least 1 species of fish (please correct me if I am wrong. I can not find info on this right now.). The seals are eating the fish which have gobbled up the plankton and in turn may be getting sick from the accumulated radiation particles. Some reports say that there has not been much radiation reported from the Alaskan waters. However, as I noted above, the seals and fishes have HUGE territories they travel.

I think your post may not have been well thought out before you posted it. Maybe you could go back and edit it with a more scientific point of view. After all, this is DU and WE do not 'muddy the water' with mis truths and pseudo science.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
34. The plant has been shut down for months??
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 02:34 PM
Dec 2011

Not hardly.
Yes, they announced with great fanfare a "cold shutdown" by the end of the year. How miraculous that they say they have achieved just that...right on schedule...except it's all bullshit.
One plant has it's "melt-through" core so far down in a hole, they can't get temperature sensors even close to read it. They don't know what the true temperature is.
Another reactor is so HOT with deadly radiation, it's not accessible to humans to see what's going on. Any robots they have built so far have gotten their electronics fried and lost forever. The technology to build robots to withstand this environment is a long ways off.
The radiation maps that are showing up now disagree with your premise that "the amount of radiation is small". In fact, hot spots are being detected all over Japan..even in Tokyo 200 miles away.
The government of Japan and TEPCO are not being honest. It's in their own best interest to be vague, disingenuous and paint a rosy picture.
Tokyo alone has about 30 million people. Do you think they wanted a wide-spread panic?
What is happening is criminal.
Watch this video please and try to educate yourself...there's a lot more reliable info out there, but first you have to look.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/movie/feature_nuclear.html



CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
42. mistake you're making is assuming "ambient" radiation levels preclude hot spots of higher levels`
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 05:49 PM
Dec 2011

or particles, which may be harmful.

you are treating specific scientific measurements, which is a sample, as the only possible value or concentration or amount of radiation, or the radiation level's cause, when they are in fact, snapshots, samples in the universe of data that's out there, some which may be higher or not represented by the lower number.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
2. Let us know when the results come in.
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 10:03 PM
Dec 2011

The results aren't due for 3 weeks, according to the article.

FirstLight

(15,771 posts)
3. sound like radiation poisoning to me
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 10:07 PM
Dec 2011
poor babies!

...and poor US as the ramifications of this disaster become more and more apparent in the months and years to come... fishing impacted, seaweed, what else...?
 

Hawkowl

(5,213 posts)
4. Eat fish at your peril!
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 10:08 PM
Dec 2011

First, the Gulf oil disaster, now Japan is busy irradiating the entire Pacific ocean. We are just now getting Japan's tsunamic debris washing onshore the Pacific coast. The radioactive debris is next.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
26. Unfortunately, I gave up seafood
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:47 AM
Dec 2011

during the last Gulf oil-spill. A once healthy food source is off of my menu.

 

jerseyjack

(1,361 posts)
5. NPR, Talk of the Nation today, reports US agency is now approving a newly engineered nuc. plant.
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 10:33 PM
Dec 2011

But don't worry. Its safe.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
11. "It's not only safe, it's cheap, too" as long as taxpayers guarantee construction loans, build waste
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:56 AM
Dec 2011

storage sites, keep the waste secure for thousands of years ----and decommission the old plants. Besides that, it's a great source of energy except sometimes there are meltdowns, we have tons of spent fuel rods sitting in "temporary" storage pools for decades, and there is no answer to the nuke waste question---and investors don't want to invest in new plants.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
20. HOPI Prophecies- akin to SO many other indigenous peoples prophecies.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 01:42 AM
Dec 2011
&feature=player_embedded
Compare to the Kogi prophecies.
Amazing.

BHN

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
29. nice video, thanks
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 11:31 AM
Dec 2011

Unfortunately, the nuclear advocates think the part about the spirit world is BS - they worship POWER and MONEY.

Was just reading "Black Elk Speaks" and he recounts the Europeans' discovery of gold in the Black Hills that was the immediate cause of the Lakotas and other tribes going to war against the US. Black Elk said the native people knew of the chunks of shiny rocks (gold) in the streams of the Black Hills but they were good for nothing, so they were left alone.

This is what we're up against---a clash of cultures ---the power-hungry, greedy moneygrubbers who destroy the land, water and sky vs. the rest of us.

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
53. There are other segments from the Elders on Youtube
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 11:24 PM
Dec 2011

that you might enjoy.
And you are correct- no more needs to be said.
BHN

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
21. K&R
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 02:18 AM
Dec 2011
“We do not expect harmful levels of radiation to reach the United States, whether it’s the West Coast, Hawaii, Alaska, or U.S. territories in the Pacific. That is the judgment of our Nuclear Regulatory Commission and many other experts.” President Barack Obama



- Now I'm certain it's radiation.......

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
28. ah, yes, the NRC, that bastion of foxes guarding the nuclear henhouse
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 11:15 AM
Dec 2011

a source I ALWAYS trust for non-biased information

 

solarman350

(136 posts)
24. Ask Dr. Kelley --WTF is Going On with these seals!!!
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 07:30 AM
Dec 2011

and why has it taken so long to get them tested for radiation sickness (since July of this year or thereabouts).

http://www.sfos.uaf.edu/directory/faculty/kelley

John Kelley
Professor Emeritus
Chemical Oceanography
School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences
Institute of Marine Science
331 Irving II
P.O. Box 757220
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220
USA

Phone: (907) 474-5585
Fax: (907) 474-7204
jjkelley@alaska.edu

----------------------------
Could be that the ring seals' immune system was compromised after they came into contact with radioactive material. Then, they came down with whatever they've got now. Then again, they could be sick with radiation sickness. Lots of money at stake here folks. Those permits and license renewals for existing and planned nukes are big money. The entire nuke industry is on the line here. This one guy could be the nuke industry's deal maker or the deal breaker. He studied the effects of radiation on marine life when Chernobyl went off, and wrote papers on that. So, in for a penny, in for a pound....He may in fact be the nuke industry's yes man for marine biology. Ring him up...Email him. See if he's a nuke stooge or an honest scientist.

Solarman350

 

uncleroy

(16 posts)
30. as i understand it,
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:04 PM
Dec 2011

if tepa doesn t get the 'all clear, it s safe now', there is so much "money" tied up in the deal already that japan itself could go bankrupt...which is why they have already declared 'cold shutdown'- even though no one knows for sure where the (molten) core IS, exactly...enenews reported that steam geysers and earthquakes have already happened- cesium volcano, anyone?

Judi Lynn

(164,122 posts)
38. Could Fukushima plant be sickening, killing ringed seals in Alaska?
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 03:39 PM
Dec 2011

Posted at 01:50 PM ET, 12/28/2011
Could Fukushima plant be sickening, killing ringed seals in Alaska?
By Elizabeth Flock

For months now, U.S. scientists have been worried about consequences stateside of the meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan in March. Now, scientists in Alaska say local ringed seals could be feeling the effects of radiation.

The D.C.-based Environment News Service reports that more than 60 seals have died and 75 seals fallen sick from a mysterious disease since mid-July. While biologist initially believed the seals were suffering from a virus, they are now testing to see if radiation is the culprit.

“Marked by bleeding lesions on the hind flippers, irritated skin around the nose and eyes and patchy hair loss on the animals’ fur coats,” the disease has caused many ringed seals to wash up on the Alaska shoreline, Reuters reports. It’s a species that rarely is seen ashore.

John Kelley, professor emeritus at the Institute of Marine Science at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, told Reuters they are testing the seals for radiation because of concern expressed by members of local communities.

More:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/fukushima-plant-could-be-sickening-killing-ringed-seals-in-alaska/2011/12/28/gIQATdPhMP_blog.html

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scientists test sick Alas...