Hillary Clinton Calls For Automatic, Universal Voter Registration
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton in a speech on Thursday called for universal, automatic voter registration, saying every citizen in the country should be automatically registered to vote when they turn 18, unless they opt-out.
Clinton spoke at Texas Southern University in Houston, where she was receiving the Barbara Jordan Public-Private Leadership Award. She also said Republican-led efforts in several states to further regulate voting and voter registration disproportionately harm both underrepresented communities and young people, adding that Republicans need to "stop fear mongering" about the "phantom epidemic" of voter fraud.
Clinton also called for a national standard that would require every state in the country to offer at least 20 days of early in-person voting, including keeping polling stations open on weekends and evenings.
During her speech, Clinton also called on Congress to pass legislation to give the federal government power to review changes to state voting laws before they go into effect. A Supreme Court decision in 2013 struck down a key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act that required certain states to have their voting changes pre-cleared by the Justice Department or by a panel of federal judges before they were implemented.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/04/hillary-clinton-voting-rights_n_7513858.html
[img]
[/img]Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)hope they put a photo on the Voter ID card....... !!!!!
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)And it's only males that are required, see: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/defenseandsecurity/a/draftreg.htm
Beauregard
(376 posts)I mean, besides making the other poster "wrong"?
CountAllVotes
(22,215 posts)Hope it will go as well as the computerized medical records have done us!
& do not recommend.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Oh wait, I guess now I do. Never mind.
CountAllVotes
(22,215 posts)msongs
(73,754 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)......53 years ago. On this, though, I doubt we'll hear "SEE, she changed her position AGAIN!"
riversedge
(80,811 posts)Hillary Clinton calls for sweeping expansion of voter registration
?uuid=mjZqgAruEeWeOQ25IcR7kw
Democratic presidential candidate calls for expanded voter access, picking a fight with Republicans who favor restrictions. (Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images)
By Anne Gearan and Niraj Chokshi June 4 at 4:06 PM
HOUSTON Hillary Rodham Clinton on Thursday called for sweeping changes in national voter registration laws aimed at making it easier for young people and minorities to take part in elections, putting her on a collision course with Republicans who say such reforms are a political ploy that would lead to widespread abuses.
In a speech at a historically black college here, Clinton called for federal legislation that would automatically register Americans to vote at age 18 and would mandate at least 20 days of early voting ahead of election days in all states.
She also took aim at several of her potential GOP opponents in some of the most sharply political remarks of her campaign so far. Calling them out by name, Clinton cited former Florida Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Texas governor Rick Perry and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker for enacting voter restrictions.
Today Republicans are systematically and deliberately trying to stop millions of American citizens from voting, Clinton said. What part of democracy are they afraid of?.......................
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)this is one thing I can get behind. We NEED the nationwide standard, because frankly I live in Florida, the textbook case for why we need a nationwide standard, because jeb will want to make sure the Tallahasee standard is so corrupt we give new Orleans a run for their money.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Policy announcements and bold initiatives on a regular basis. Would do wonders in combatting the media narrative.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Thumbs up to her for suggesting this, though the RW'ers will fight it bitterly.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)Democrats are sneaky that way.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Take back the states. Our WA state elections official attempted to go with the GOP data base to cut out voters. She tried to sign on but was stopped by the Governor, I guess. She is a Bagger, it was obvious reading the election pamphlet, but IIRC she didn't run as a GOP. But all the dog whistles were there in her statement.
They are not going to stop these stunts. I believe HRC could finagle this through Congress. I might be wrong but I think she could. She did get SCHIP and other health care measures through as Senator that she couldn't do as FLOTUS. But then the GOP majority came in from 2010 and 2014 and stole most of that progress. We'll see.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)William769
(59,147 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Backwoodsrider
(764 posts)That's what I like about progressives/democrats they offer up stuff. Will it fly? probably not but its fresh meat and I have to believe at least half of us voters got our heads turned on and have noticed a pattern where dems bring up stuff and some stuff might even get implemented. Repubs just say no and sh!tcan everything and lead us 1 step closer to infrastructure breakdown/armed revalution.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)And how come the first three replies are negative to the idea of universal suffrage? It is NOT like the draft, it will NOT lead to voter fraud, it is in no way like Health Care Reform and I don't know any Democrat anywhere who would complain about everyone being allowed to vote. Plus, excessive concern about voter fraud is not even a Democratic issue---we're concerned about election fraud, a whole different thing.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)People who truly love democracy would make voting as easy as possible.
People who don't would make voting more difficult.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)All Dems should be onboard with this.
Time to take back our Right to Vote.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)For crying out loud!
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)on my CBS Sports Radio as the lead story during the top of the hour news break I knew Secretary Clinton was playing on a different field than the rest of the candidates. All she has to do is to say something . . . anything, and it's front page news. I like the idea. We should constantly be searching for ways to increase voter participation, but this coverage just blew my mind.
It made me think her political strategy of relative silence might not be a losing strategy after all. The media is dying to buzz for her. The longer she can keep them on the string the better for her campaign I'm starting to think.
DrBulldog
(841 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)And her campaign team is controlling the media in a masterful way.
The Dems have taken so much crap from the media, and the Clintons have for the last 25 years of their life. Public private, its been a free for all.
What she is doing in this campaign is simply treating them like the irresponsible juveniles that they are.
Ignore them until they take journalism seriously.
Kudos to her, for finally putting a stop to the media b.s.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)And they do a lot of copy testing and figuring out what is going on. I think that they know very well how to manage things, so they're probably going to keep her "inaccessible" for the duration. Clinton's can only be chinked in the debates and I think she's going to do well except on a few issues such as inequality and trade (she will support TPP I believe).
DrBulldog
(841 posts)Bernie Sanders has already preempted the number issue concerning Americans from her: wealth inequality. In terms of issues, Hillary is already desperately behind Bernie, she knows it, and she's reacting to it ... she needs to get out of her paid-speech limousine (or van) and start connecting with the people with the real issues on a daily basis.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)This is the heart of Democracy.
The right to have a say. To vote. To choose.
Voter suppression most certainly is a very big issue.
I'm betting Bernie Sanders agrees with her statements today.
But you don't have to.
You have your opinion on this issue.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Not sure how this will ever get approved in a Republican congress.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)And this is one of many reasons why they don't want the Fed Govt in their corrupt business.
They want to control the vote and their power.
Democracy is not a priority for them.
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)Cha
(319,079 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,532 posts)But so many repukes on DU are obsessed with the dog muzzle that we barely noticed this brilliant move on Hillary's part.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)What database has every 17 yr old living in the Country with current address to break them down by voting precinct? And what percentage are going to fail to respond to the first canvas to confirm their continued residence in the precinct?
In principal it sounds good. But the details look more like a boondoggle.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,096 posts)at 16 years of age, they are required to provide their address. There could be a computer program that automatically registers them in the address they gave. It would be then their responsibility to update a change of address.
Just a thought.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)William Jefferson Clinton 1993 - National Voter Registration aka Motor-Voter
yellowcanine
(36,792 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)yellowcanine
(36,792 posts)Right now states regulate "time, place and manner of elections" under Article One of the Constitution. There is some leeway on what constitutes "time, place, and manner of elections" but not much with the current SCOTUS. So we need to change the Constitution. Hillary's idea is a good one. I would also add issuing everyone a Voter ID card with their picture on it free of charge for those who want it that the states would be required to recognize.
yellowcanine
(36,792 posts)They can't be against it, they can't be for it. So they are going to be stepping in it all over the place. Let the games begin.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)The Hillary haters will soon condemn this as corporatism.