Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue May 1, 2012, 08:52 PM May 2012

Rupert Murdoch's Fox broadcast licences targeted by US ethics group

Source: The Guardian

A Washington-based ethics watchdog is calling on federal regulators to revoke News Corporation's 27 Fox broadcast licences in the wake of the highly critical report on phone hacking from the UK parliament.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew) has written to the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Julius Genachowski, calling on the regulator to pull the plug on Rupert Murdoch's lucrative television licences on grounds of character.

The letter argues that the final report of the UK Commons culture, media and sport committee, which concluded that Murdoch was not fit to run a major international company, had implications for the US regulators that they had now to act upon.

Melanie Sloan, Crew's director, said that the Murdochs had clearly failed the character test that is embedded within US media law as it is within British. "If they are not passing the character standard under British law, it seems to me that they are not going to meet the character standard in America."

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/01/rupert-murdoch-fox-licences-us

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Liberalynn

(7,549 posts)
1. How much would I love to see this happen
Tue May 1, 2012, 08:57 PM
May 2012

not saying it will but I would dance down the streets singing joy to the world every day.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
2. Well, the standards are ...
Tue May 1, 2012, 09:05 PM
May 2012

you cannot show a (female) nipple on TV for a 10th of a second without threatening to be fined half a million dollars for every station in the U.S. which carried it ...

But Faux can show a guy with a shirt with one of the few remaining "seven words you can't say on TV or radio) for at least 10 seconds, and not get fined for an "inadvertent" display ... despite the fact that the cameraman sought out the "offender" ...

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
6. not to mention Faux can LIE constantly & never give evidence of their lying statements
Tue May 1, 2012, 09:34 PM
May 2012

not to mention, this org is a front for the RW media machine.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
12. I don't see how that's "inadvertent" ...
Wed May 2, 2012, 09:40 AM
May 2012

was the cameraman hoping she'd flash her ... um ... breasts? She was jumping up and down ...

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)
5. it seems to me that they are not going to meet the character standard in America."
Tue May 1, 2012, 09:26 PM
May 2012

Nah. We have a much greater tolerance of assholes. As a matter of fact we really encourage that behavior and reward it with enthusiasm.

beac

(9,992 posts)
8. Hell, we made that piece of slime Murdoch an American citizen.
Tue May 1, 2012, 09:53 PM
May 2012

My dream is to someday see that revoked.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
7. I don't understand why their license hasn't been revoked before with all of the phony
Tue May 1, 2012, 09:46 PM
May 2012

news stories in the past supported by phony video footage. They have also incited violence with their rhetoric.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rupert Murdoch's Fox broa...