Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Psephos

(8,032 posts)
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 11:30 AM Jun 2015

Obama lawyers asked secret court to ignore public court's decision on spying

Source: The Guardian

The Obama administration has asked a secret surveillance court to ignore a federal court that found bulk surveillance illegal and to once again grant the National Security Agency the power to collect the phone records of millions of Americans for six months.

The legal request, filed nearly four hours after Barack Obama vowed to sign a new law banning precisely the bulk collection he asks the secret court to approve, also suggests that the administration may not necessarily comply with any potential court order demanding that the collection stop.

US officials confirmed last week that they would ask the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court – better known as the Fisa court, a panel that meets in secret as a step in the surveillance process and thus far has only ever had the government argue before it – to turn the domestic bulk collection spigot back on.

Justice Department national security chief John A Carlin cited a six-month transition period provided in the USA Freedom Act – passed by the Senate last week to ban the bulk collection – as a reason to permit an “orderly transition” of the NSA’s domestic dragnet. Carlin did not address whether the transition clause of the Freedom Act still applies now that a congressional deadlock meant the program shut down on 31 May.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/09/obama-fisa-court-surveillance-phone-records

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama lawyers asked secret court to ignore public court's decision on spying (Original Post) Psephos Jun 2015 OP
wtf BadGimp Jun 2015 #1
Well, waddayaknow! hobbit709 Jun 2015 #2
Can't say I am at all surprised. marym625 Jun 2015 #3
They need that information in order to protect America Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #4
Just makes me cringe! marym625 Jun 2015 #5
We have been told to wait, and wait, for a few crumbs. Wait until his 2nd term. We waited. TheNutcracker Jun 2015 #6
Transparency sure ain't what it used to be. Scuba Jun 2015 #7
Article makes no sense. How is it 'ignoring' the law when the law provides for a 6 month period? randome Jun 2015 #8
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie Jun 2015 #9
Hows that police state working out for you 1 percenters? RR2 Jun 2015 #10
Surprise - Surprise - Not - Sold Out By Obama - Yet Again cantbeserious Jun 2015 #11
Shocked! Shocked! I say ... aggiesal Jun 2015 #12
This is really bad. blackspade Jun 2015 #13
Say one thing in public, do the exact opposite in secret. Fuddnik Jun 2015 #14
Not surprised coming from this administration. bigwillq Jun 2015 #15
Bookmarking this for the next time Kelvin Mace Jun 2015 #16
Speaking out of both sides of his mouth. ozone_man Jun 2015 #17
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. Article makes no sense. How is it 'ignoring' the law when the law provides for a 6 month period?
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 12:08 PM
Jun 2015

Was this written by a six year old?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
13. This is really bad.
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 02:21 PM
Jun 2015

Bulk collection is banned under that law.
Circumventing it is some police state bullshit.

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
17. Speaking out of both sides of his mouth.
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 09:23 AM
Jun 2015

Why does it take a paper like the Guardian to report on this?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama lawyers asked secre...