Investigation Finds the TSA Didn’t Catch 73 Terrorism-Linked Airport Employees
Source: SLATE
The number one job of the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, is to screen people. The point of this screening is, presumably, to identify evildoers both foreign and domestic before they get on airplanes and do evil things on/with them. There is a problem with this so-called screening process, however: The TSA doesnt appear to be very good at it.
Earlier this month, the agency flunked a test of its own screening of passengers when it failed to stop potential weapons getting through security checkpoints 67 out of 70 times. It turns out, TSA farsightedness is not only a problem when it comes to passengers, but airport employees too. According to a Department of Homeland Security audit, the agency failed to identify 73 airport workers linked to terrorism. Or as the report read: "TSA acknowledged that these individuals were cleared for access to secure airport areas despite representing a potential transportation security threat."
Yes, the TSA is responsible for some two million employees at American airports, but 73 terrorism-linked employees seems like an OK screening success rate for employees at Pizza Hut, not for airport employees. I mean, theres only so much harm a pepperoni pizza can do to America. How did these 73 slip through the cracks? Heres how, from USA Today: The problem was that TSA checks airline and airport applicants and workers against a Department of Homeland Security watch list that isn't as comprehensive as the government's terrorist database, according to the department's inspector general.
Read more: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/08/homeland_security_audit_finds_tsa_didn_t_catch_73_terrorism_linked_airport.html
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Burma Jones
(11,760 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Talk to any TSA worker and they will tell you they just do not have the tools or training to catch new trends.
staggerleem
(469 posts)73/2,000,000 = .0000365, or an error rate of .00365%. Statistically that ain't too shabby!
However, the information they needed to keep these rogues from slipping thru the cracks WAS and IS available, and whoever decided NOT to check databases from other agencies should be reprimanded and re-assigned to something his decision making abilities are more suited to - cleaning airport bathrooms sounds about right (with apologies to anyone who does that for a living.)
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Some people are more prone to be terrorists and should be given a much higher scrutiny. Others like 62 year old grandma Mathilda are lower risk and can be screened more rapidly.