Illinois governor: Shutdown worth pain if it brings change
Source: Telegraph Herald / Associated Press
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. Gov. Bruce Rauner says a partial state government shutdown is worth the pain if it brings fundamental change to business and politics in Illinois.
The Republican told reporters this morning that "change is hard ... but we need to have change." Rauner addressed workers at the Illinois Emergency Management Agency one day before the state begins a new fiscal year without a budget agreement.
Rauner insists on changes he says will make it cheaper to do business and to free politics from corruption before agreeing with the Democratic-controlled legislature. Democrats say it's more important to have a budget in place so state services aren't interrupted.
Read more: http://www.thonline.com/news/iowa-illinois-wisconsin/article_a697eb30-1f3b-11e5-9ec3-03fdd370ab77.html
In other words Rauner's going to do the political equivalent of spinning on his back in the Wally World parking lot.
BumRushDaShow
(169,719 posts)A (somewhat) teabagger state legislature and a Democratic governor with a budget that expires at midnight. Wolf has the option to veto the whole thing (which would mean shutdown) or do a line-item (which would keep services going). Last I saw, he hadn't decided yet.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)I despise that Richie Rich bullshit artist...
AKing
(511 posts)at the worst possible time. We wouldn't be in this mess if he hadn't done this. He's treating Ill like one of his venture capitalist businesses that eventually went bankrupt
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)The tax expired Jan. 1. Republican governor did not take over until Jan. 12. Democrats had all last year to extend the tax. They declined to do it.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)so you're expected to understand that question.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)and the governorship why would they need a veto-proof majority? Gov. Quinn said he wanted it extended. Where was the veto going to come from? The sky? Democrats 71, Republicans 47, not that it has any relevance to the issue. Speaker Madigan did not want it extended for election reasons.
You are trying to throw a red herring into the conversation. How unusual for you....
apnu
(8,790 posts)That'w why he isn't strong arming anybody like Walker did in Wisconsin.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)they're stronger in Illinois than in Wisconsin, but not veto-proof.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)The tax expired Jan. 1, 2015.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)According to the Chicago Tribune Rauner let those tax cuts expire cuz he wanted lower taxes (like every other Republican)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-illinois-income-tax-rate-falls-met-20141230-story.html
Welcome to DU by the way
former9thward
(33,424 posts)He did not take power until Jan. 12. He did not let them expire. Quinn did.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Thanks for keeping me honest.
Nitram
(27,741 posts)But they'll change their tune the first time they fail to raise the U.S. debt ceiling and find out what the economic consequences are. In the real world.
47of74
(18,470 posts)I think for many Republicans they don't care about the economic consequences to us or the world. They think this country is theirs to rule by divine right and will hurt anyone or anything to achieve that goals.
Nitram
(27,741 posts)And they know it. For all the fuss they make to get the evangelical vote.
valerief
(53,235 posts)They want the empire to fall so their owners can usurp it.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Oldtimeralso
(1,945 posts)I think Gov. Ruiner is the worst Governor Illinois has had (pardon the pun) bar none!
I got tired of hearing about these shutdowns. Like little kids taking their ball home. Back to work already, and stop the political ploys.
AlRod
(7 posts)who's on his power trip at the suffering of the elderly, disabled, ill, children, etc.....
Where's the media on that?
He's the worst Governor we in Illinois have ever had, and I'm in my 60's.
Rauners a real tough guy.
City Lights
(25,822 posts)Jagoff.
I'm still somewhat dumbfounded that this fucker was elected Governor.
AKing
(511 posts)City Lights
(25,822 posts)I hope they're happy now. Not.
47of74
(18,470 posts)He would just have to add on one of the following and the rubes would vote for him;
- "I hate the black guy (The President)!"
- "I'll ban abortion!"
- "I'll stop the gays from getting married!"
murielm99
(32,988 posts)The Ruiner won't be suffering. He can go hide in one of his nine mansions.
roamer65
(37,953 posts)If they do, they should go "parliamentary" on his ass. Override everything he refuses to sign.
47of74
(18,470 posts)It looks like they have the 60% threshold in both chambers to be able to override his vetoes.
I think Ruiner is looking at his neighbor Governors to the east (Indiana) and north (Wisconsin) and to a lesser extent the one in the west (Iowa) and feels that he has to be a big time GOP badass so he doesn't get primaried.