Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 05:40 PM May 2012

5-Story Building Collapses in Harlem

Source: NBC NEWYORK

The FDNY said the building "pancaked," meaning all the floors collapsed onto each other

A five-story brownstone collapsed in Harlem Friday afternoon.

Officials said the building at 110 West 23rd Street, near Lenox Avenue, "pancaked," meaning all the floors fell onto each other.

There were no immediate reports of injuries or people trapped.


Read more: http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Harlem-Building-Collapse-123rd-Street-Lenox-Avenue-150229805.html



http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/harlem-building-construction-collapses-article-1.1072810
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5-Story Building Collapses in Harlem (Original Post) MindMover May 2012 OP
so horrible, I hope no one was hurt ! steve2470 May 2012 #1
NY1 will have it soon KurtNYC May 2012 #3
Yikes! Scary stuff! Rhiannon12866 May 2012 #2
next up, the overpasses leading to/from GW Bridge wordpix May 2012 #4
Under construction, thank goodness. haele May 2012 #5
They must mean 123rd Street frazzled May 2012 #6
Looking at the building on Google Earth/Street View Cooley Hurd May 2012 #7
The Daily News link says it was under construction. harmonicon May 2012 #11
Perhaps this was the building? RufusTFirefly May 2012 #8
That's it. Cooley Hurd May 2012 #9
That's not a building, thats a sardine can made of brick may3rd May 2012 #24
The second link said it was under construction Warpy May 2012 #10
That makes sense. It did fall into its own foot print. RC May 2012 #12
Even with an SE things can get pretty dicey when making major changes to 100 year old buildings. Hassin Bin Sober May 2012 #25
Pancaked? The 9/11 Twoofers will be all over this! Odin2005 May 2012 #13
Must of been nano-thermite! Archae May 2012 #16
Nope. Not a steel frame building. RC May 2012 #20
Nano-termites, then. n/t Igel May 2012 #21
an inside insurance job or faulty cheap materials may3rd May 2012 #22
I think that address should be w 123st. nt CK_John May 2012 #14
Picture apparently taken in the basement before collapse... PoliticAverse May 2012 #15
Good grief, why did they bother? It looks rotten, terribly unsafe. Should have been bulldozed. freshwest May 2012 #18
It looks like decades of deferred maintenance and incompetent band-aid patches NBachers May 2012 #19
tear it down and start fresh...oh wait may3rd May 2012 #23
omg Marrah_G May 2012 #17

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
4. next up, the overpasses leading to/from GW Bridge
Fri May 4, 2012, 05:48 PM
May 2012

Every time I crossed the bridge, I would get stuck in traffic under these overpasses that looked like they would collapse any minute, with their rusty, cracked, and non-maintained facade. I use the past tense b/c I now avoid going through NYC and over GW Bridge, mainly due to the very sketchy infrastructure to/from.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
7. Looking at the building on Google Earth/Street View
Fri May 4, 2012, 06:11 PM
May 2012

...it looks like it used to be sandwiched between other buildings. I wonder if it was structurally comprimised when the other buildings were taken down?

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
11. The Daily News link says it was under construction.
Fri May 4, 2012, 07:24 PM
May 2012

Whatever you saw on google might have been a building that used to be there.

 

may3rd

(593 posts)
24. That's not a building, thats a sardine can made of brick
Sat May 5, 2012, 09:51 AM
May 2012

repost a pic in five years an the new structure,as planned, will be three times as wide
jmo

Warpy

(111,235 posts)
10. The second link said it was under construction
Fri May 4, 2012, 06:50 PM
May 2012

I'll bet they tried to make it an open plan place to appeal to more buyers and didn't consult a structural engineer first.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
12. That makes sense. It did fall into its own foot print.
Fri May 4, 2012, 08:00 PM
May 2012

Gotta save that nickle, maximize that profit. Experts just cost money. And either tell you what you already know or tell you have to do it this way and that it will cost more than the way you want to do it.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,324 posts)
25. Even with an SE things can get pretty dicey when making major changes to 100 year old buildings.
Sat May 5, 2012, 10:36 AM
May 2012

That's why my city, Chicago, requires a million dollar excavation insurance policy when digging around foundations. There were several cases of builders collapsing the NEIGHBOR'S building.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
15. Picture apparently taken in the basement before collapse...
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:12 PM
May 2012

( From: http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/160618/no-injuries-reported-as-five-story-building-collapses-in-harlem )

'Real estate agent Jay Harper, who showed the building to a client in January, says the basement was reinforced with braces and that a contractor had told him he was "scared of the building."'

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
18. Good grief, why did they bother? It looks rotten, terribly unsafe. Should have been bulldozed.
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:15 PM
May 2012

At least no one got hurt. That's the good thing about this story. Thanks for the picture, it explains the story.

NBachers

(17,098 posts)
19. It looks like decades of deferred maintenance and incompetent band-aid patches
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:37 PM
May 2012

"Just fix it so it'll work for now."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»5-Story Building Collapse...