Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,015 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:31 PM May 2012

(Alameda County, CA) Prosecutors file charges against Occupy protesters

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

The Alameda County District Attorney's office filed charges Friday against three people arrested at Occupy Oakland's demonstration this week and said it is seeking to revoke probation on two others who were arrested that day.

Jordan Bard, 22, was charged with felony vandalism as well as a misdemeanor for wearing a mask during the commission of a crime; Stephanie Demos, 54, was charged with resisting arrest and failure to disperse after a declaration of an unlawful assembly; and Isaac Castro, 24, was charged with felony assault on a peace officer.

Prosecutors said they are seeking to revoke probation for Siaosi Aleamotua, 19, who had previous a robbery conviction and was subject to a stay-away order from Frank Ogawa Plaza when police officers said they saw him there.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/05/04/BAC61ODQO0.DTL

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
1. declaration of unlawful assembly. . . . wow, let that sink in, not constitutional sounding at all
Sat May 5, 2012, 12:51 AM
May 2012

And yet somehow legal, and somehow it's only unlawful when "lefties" do it.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
2. the ghost of UBL just laughing away
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:00 AM
May 2012

as he's won beyond the grave. so Oakland etc is stuck somewhere between Iran and China and the more they pull this the last ammo we have against those countries.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
3. Let's be fair. We only have right to peaceful assembly.
Sat May 5, 2012, 04:55 AM
May 2012

As to what constitutes unlawful could make interesting court transcript reading.

ret5hd

(20,489 posts)
4. So, as soon as the cops start beating us, the assembly is no longer "peaceful"...
Sat May 5, 2012, 08:58 AM
May 2012

and therefore no longer "lawful".

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
5. I'd say that would place the police as not a part of the assembly.
Sat May 5, 2012, 04:22 PM
May 2012

Therefore the assembly would still be peaceful.

Now, if the assembly fought back, it would no longer be peaceful, but the police should face civil rights charges, charges that should exonerate the original assembly -- albeit with the damages of that timing being lost.

Can't stop people or even the police from acting badly. We can exact some form of better-late-than-never justice from the bad guys.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Alameda County, CA) Pros...