Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Wed May 9, 2012, 02:39 AM May 2012

Psychiatry Manual Drafters Back Down on Diagnoses

Source: New York Times

In a rare step, doctors on a panel revising psychiatry’s influential diagnostic manual have backed away from two controversial proposals that would have expanded the number of people identified as having psychotic or depressive disorders.

The doctors dropped two diagnoses that they ultimately concluded were not supported by the evidence: “attenuated psychosis syndrome,” proposed to identify people at risk of developing psychosis, and “mixed anxiety depressive disorder,” a hybrid of the two mood problems.

They also tweaked their proposed definition of depression to allay fears that the normal sadness people experience after the loss of a loved one, a job or a marriage would not be mistaken for a mental disorder.

But the panel, appointed by the American Psychiatric Association to complete the fifth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or D.S.M., did not retreat from another widely criticized proposal, to streamline the definition of autism. Predictions by some experts that the new definition will sharply reduce the number of people given a diagnosis are off base, panel members said, citing evidence from a newly completed study.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/health/dsm-panel-backs-down-on-diagnoses.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Psychiatry Manual Drafters Back Down on Diagnoses (Original Post) alp227 May 2012 OP
K&R. Thanks for posting this... Rhiannon12866 May 2012 #1
Maybe they've remembered the crap storm that exploded after 'IV' came out. BlueIris May 2012 #2
Not only that Gman May 2012 #3
Big pharma's not going to like this. Vinca May 2012 #4
The insurance industry wants fewer conditions...pharma wants more HereSince1628 May 2012 #5
This all seems so subjective, somehow. nt bemildred May 2012 #6

Rhiannon12866

(205,232 posts)
1. K&R. Thanks for posting this...
Wed May 9, 2012, 02:45 AM
May 2012

I was a psych major, remember the big changes in DSM IV, so I'm quite interested...

BlueIris

(29,135 posts)
2. Maybe they've remembered the crap storm that exploded after 'IV' came out.
Wed May 9, 2012, 03:53 AM
May 2012

I was writing a long paper on mental health and public policy at the time, and remember reading about the response from media, politicians, clinicians. Lots of controversy. One person said the increase in number of diagnoses for the 4th edition "risk(ed) defining us all as mentally ill."

I doubt the people writing 'V' want to deal with a similar uproar this time around.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
3. Not only that
Wed May 9, 2012, 07:52 AM
May 2012

But to not classify symptoms as a disorder if they're not supported by evidence, regardless of opinions of anecdotal evidence.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
5. The insurance industry wants fewer conditions...pharma wants more
Wed May 9, 2012, 09:16 AM
May 2012

This fight has more faces to consider than a personal identity disorder.

The public is truly scared of mental illness. Possibly, because they might get dx'd and then be handed back a fearsome load of the discrimination and disdain routinely heaped onto the mentally ill.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Psychiatry Manual Drafter...