Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 12:53 PM Aug 2015

Fox News poll: Donald Trump still leads GOP field

Source: Tampa Metro Bugle

A new Fox News poll finds Donald Trump leading the GOP presidential field nationally with 25%, followed by Ben Carson at 12%, Ted Cruz at 10%, Jeb Bush at 9%, Mike Huckabee at 6%, Scott Walker at 6%, Carly Fiorina at 5%, John Kasich at 4%, Marco Rubio at 4%, Chris Christie at 3% and Rand Paul at 3%.

Read more: http://tampa.metrobugle.com/2015/08/16/fox-news-poll-donald-trump-still-leads-gop-field/



Trump still killing the Republican field. Non-politician Carson in second. Establishment hand-picked tools Bush and Walker and Rubio down to 4th and 6th and 9th respectively. A good poll.
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox News poll: Donald Trump still leads GOP field (Original Post) Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 OP
Got to Rec it ... This has gone past bizarre. All the money invested libdem4life Aug 2015 #1
He did us all one favor tho tblue Aug 2015 #2
There seems to be a lot of that going around pscot Aug 2015 #15
There are some things he says I like, and then OMG, I think, did I just agree with him! RKP5637 Aug 2015 #28
Glad to see I'm not 840high Aug 2015 #45
"Why Donald Trump makes sense to many voters — even some Democrats" RKP5637 Aug 2015 #54
Thank you very much. 840high Aug 2015 #56
I know he's got a private helicopter in use aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2015 #3
It will be like the Koch Brothers - no amount of additional money will get him anything - everyone trillion Aug 2015 #40
I think it is possible for him to win the GOP nomination Senator Tankerbell Aug 2015 #52
Indigestion time at Fox News hay rick Aug 2015 #4
Fox news is in a tizzy! They can't control Trump and neither can the GOP establishment! They're RKP5637 Aug 2015 #29
Fox is an entertainment link... FarPoint Aug 2015 #5
If that makes it easier for you, go ahead. 7962 Aug 2015 #7
Easy???? FarPoint Aug 2015 #11
Just a different version of the other cable networks. All have their orders 7962 Aug 2015 #16
Yep! It's all about $$$$$'s. All of the big three are in the same bag, cut from the same RKP5637 Aug 2015 #30
xactly +1 840high Aug 2015 #46
And polls are just another way to get the apathetics to care - Horse race anyone? erronis Aug 2015 #19
Oh for a crystal ball about now Plucketeer Aug 2015 #6
I DO have a crystal ball (his name is Nate) and - SPOILER ALERT - Trump does not get the nomination Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #8
I never thought he would get the nomination. FarPoint Aug 2015 #12
All we need from Trump is to fragment the GOP base so badly that they NCjack Aug 2015 #20
Agreed. They can't win with Trump. The Latino vote is already massively energized because of him. trillion Aug 2015 #38
Not at all sure the Dems have it, in spite of going in w/ moonscape Aug 2015 #42
I heartily disagree! Chemisse Aug 2015 #24
So 58% want someone else and 17% just don't care. TexasProgresive Aug 2015 #9
If Trump is the only issue, the polls have been the same. If you think Bush, Walker, and Rubio's Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #13
How interesting will President Trump be? pscot Aug 2015 #17
Trump would be better than Caligula but worse than Nero. You'd see him as Emperor before you see him Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #32
And the only one with a legitimate shot, Kasich, is near the bottom. nt 7962 Aug 2015 #18
I'll agree on Kasich underpants Aug 2015 #23
Kasich is the 1-of-17 that Democrats say "he doesn't sound too crazy." That's why he's only running Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #47
Oooooh, that's gotta burn the so-called "serious" candidates truebluegreen Aug 2015 #10
In the words of "The Donald," this is UUUUUUUUUGE. Vinca Aug 2015 #14
Republicans don't want these other lovuian Aug 2015 #21
He's the best of the fools they have to pick from. He may be egotistical, but he's not RKP5637 Aug 2015 #31
Jeb! In the context of a foot race you are getting boxed in to the inside underpants Aug 2015 #22
If Trump didn't run, "None of the Above" would be the leader in the Republican primaries. nt Xipe Totec Aug 2015 #25
A complement to Their Characters, do you still miss Shrub? orpupilofnature57 Aug 2015 #26
Chris Christie at 3%? roflmao SummerSnow Aug 2015 #27
So much for the "dream" ticket of Walker/Rubio (or Rubio/Walker)! Oh so we can hope. Wisc Progressive Aug 2015 #33
Scott "Peaked-too-Early" Walker may be the Tim Pawlenty of the 2016 campaign Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #34
They are all a scary bunch of people, but I'm glad to see Walker so far down in the polls. C Moon Aug 2015 #35
I'm surprised they picked fetal tissue experimenter Dr. Carson? Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2015 #36
What we've seen for the last seveal years of repub vs repug - the biggest racist wins. trillion Aug 2015 #37
Should I feel sorry for the field or not? sakabatou Aug 2015 #39
You should feel sorry for America because of the field Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #43
True sakabatou Aug 2015 #51
Hi Folks Wash. state Desk Jet Aug 2015 #41
He released his job stragedy - it will please 840high Aug 2015 #44
It will "please a lot of people" on the right. No corporate taxes, more 'right-to-work'. Blames pampango Aug 2015 #55
I was talking about the right. 840high Aug 2015 #57
It is interesting how Bush, Walker, Paul, and Rubio have fallen davidpdx Aug 2015 #48
Generally, the non-politicians (amateurs) are rising while the politicians (professional candidates) Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #49
I also think turnout in the general election will be lower davidpdx Aug 2015 #50
Keep on Trumpin... GReedDiamond Aug 2015 #53

tblue

(16,350 posts)
2. He did us all one favor tho
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:03 PM
Aug 2015

when he spoke explained how & why big money buys candidates. Can't stand DT but I caught myself saying, "Damn right! Wait. Did I just agree with Donald Trump?"

If Fox News released this poll, he must be really ahead.

RKP5637

(67,101 posts)
54. "Why Donald Trump makes sense to many voters — even some Democrats"
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 09:31 AM
Aug 2015

Here's an interesting article I came across on this. I think he's hit on the nerve that for millions and millions of Americans the future looks pretty bleak given the present course. In his bombastic way, he's not afraid to speak on what millions of Americans are feeling, while other politicians seem only capable on talking about abortion, religion, gay marriage and all the rest of the crap they harp on to get the vote. Trump goes after what is really F'ed up in this country. Bernie IMO does similar.

I've worked for people like Trump and frankly they were great to work for/with them. You always knew where you stood, what to do and there was no bullshit from them. I had one CEO like him and he ran a great company. I can see why some people like him. That all said, my concern is he often sounds more like a dictator than a presidential candidate, and I don't care for the part of him that rips others apart IMO often unnecessarily. That's where I like Bernie better.

Anyway, this article was interesting if you've not read it. It really hits on why many people like him and I can see their point.

"Why Donald Trump makes sense to many voters — even some Democrats"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/why-donald-trump-makes-sense-to-a-lot-of-voters--even-some-democrats/2015/08/15/cee648f0-42bf-11e5-8ab4-c73967a143d3_story.html

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
3. I know he's got a private helicopter in use
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:14 PM
Aug 2015

but is Trump really spending a lot of money so far to maintain this frontrunner position? How big is his staff? He's getting tons of air time absolutely free just by opening his mouth at impromptu press coverage. I doubt that he's spending as much as Jeb Bush. According to this New York Times article, Trump has spent nearly the least of any candidate in the race. Jeb Bush is spending $10 million for a massive TV campaign that I'll bet won't get him as much face time in the news as Trump is getting for free. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz aren't getting much for their money. What will happen if Trump really starts spending money?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
40. It will be like the Koch Brothers - no amount of additional money will get him anything - everyone
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 10:30 PM
Aug 2015

already knows his spiel. He's a major rude crude sexist racist jerk. They will either vote for him at this point, or not.
Remember the Koches spent 100 million on a state election in 2012 and the voters were chanting their name(in a bad way) when the candidate was trying to speak and he lost the election. I don't remember which candidate/state it was but there were articles after that more money was finally proven to not beable to buy elections. Trump's wasting his cash. He's getting press for ratings but you can bet when it comes to the wire, most of those networks will actively turn against him in fear that he would be president. He's is the fool - being tooled by the press who know better than to get him elected president.

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
52. I think it is possible for him to win the GOP nomination
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 01:24 AM
Aug 2015

but impossible for him to win the general election. That's why I find his campaign to be hilarious. He'll never be president but he might just ruin the GOP.

hay rick

(7,600 posts)
4. Indigestion time at Fox News
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:17 PM
Aug 2015

They tried to declare Huckabee, Fiorina, and Rubio as winners of their "debate" and all are languishing in the middle of the pack, polling 6% or less.

RKP5637

(67,101 posts)
29. Fox news is in a tizzy! They can't control Trump and neither can the GOP establishment! They're
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 06:06 PM
Aug 2015

in uncharted territory. They're used to directing events/direction, but not being told to F off by Trump.

FarPoint

(12,309 posts)
11. Easy????
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:53 PM
Aug 2015

Fox is not credible period...It's pure propaganda. Bought and Paid for right wing fantasy for sale.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
16. Just a different version of the other cable networks. All have their orders
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 02:05 PM
Aug 2015

Just not a big deal. Its a cable network. The big 3 get the real ratings.
There's no difference between a lineup of O'reilly and Kelly and a lineup of Hayes & Maddow. They all have their focus and they all have their overlords.
And watching the debate I was expecting no tough questions for anyone. i was surprised that they did get tough. And it wasnt just Trump; asking cruz who God told him to help first was priceless.

RKP5637

(67,101 posts)
30. Yep! It's all about $$$$$'s. All of the big three are in the same bag, cut from the same
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 06:08 PM
Aug 2015

piece of cloth, especially now with Comcast at the helm of NBC.

erronis

(15,216 posts)
19. And polls are just another way to get the apathetics to care - Horse race anyone?
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 02:12 PM
Aug 2015

Polls are put out by media that want to get the attention of the people that don't have anything else to do while sitting on their couch. Another way to sell advertising and POV - usually dictated by their lords and masters.

Crowd numbers are a lot more real. Perhaps inflated by Trump$ or otherwise. I don't think Bernie is spending very much on getting people to show up. They are spending their own money to see and support him.

Most others are relying on companies making PAC contributions or companies "asking" their employees to support a particular candidate (read: if you don't contribute, you don't work here.)

FarPoint

(12,309 posts)
12. I never thought he would get the nomination.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:56 PM
Aug 2015

Don't need Nate for that predictable outcome. Trumps job is to be entertainment for the GOP....keep the media off real topics that involve problem solving. He's on assignment....

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
20. All we need from Trump is to fragment the GOP base so badly that they
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 02:29 PM
Aug 2015

will never agree on a candidate. At this time, working very well.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
38. Agreed. They can't win with Trump. The Latino vote is already massively energized because of him.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 10:21 PM
Aug 2015

the dems already have this. The only change the Repubs had was Bush - Bush could cross over for Florida voters and also get the nations elderly. The bet on trump is, are the majority of voters racists? No they're not. The majority elected Obama twice. Trump will lose and kill the chances of any other repub winning because he's divided them. The Dems will rally for the dem candidate when it comes down to it, even the racist dems.

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
42. Not at all sure the Dems have it, in spite of going in w/
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 11:55 PM
Aug 2015

an electoral edge. Hillary's high negatives, horrible instincts and repeated bad campaigning are huge hurdles.

As I understand it, neither Bush nor Rubio won an election in Florida in a presidential year, only during low voter turnout off years, so I'm not convinced either necessarily auto-locks Florida.



TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
9. So 58% want someone else and 17% just don't care.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:41 PM
Aug 2015

I haven't been following this closely but haven't the polls been all about the same?

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
13. If Trump is the only issue, the polls have been the same. If you think Bush, Walker, and Rubio's
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:57 PM
Aug 2015

polling is more important (because one of them will get the nomination), the polls have been changing because Bush is sagging, Walker is free falling, and Rubio cannot (with any consistency) capitalize on Bush's and Walker's weaknesses.

Trump is interesting as a symptom of the (fatal?) sickness infecting the Republican Party; he is also interesting because he helps illustrate the ignorance, xenophobia, and bigotry of a shockingly large minority within the modern Republican primary voter block. He is NOT interesting in any sort of a horse-race-for-the-nomination fashion because he can only lead a field divided among many candidates; his 25% to 30% of support in their primary looks impressive in a field of 17 but it won't mean much when the race winnows down to 3 or 4 candidates.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
17. How interesting will President Trump be?
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 02:05 PM
Aug 2015

I know it's supposed to be impossible, but Mencken rules apply here.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
32. Trump would be better than Caligula but worse than Nero. You'd see him as Emperor before you see him
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 06:36 PM
Aug 2015

elected President.

On the "how interesting" measure, he'd break the scale (and by "interesting," I mean the word in the same sense as it is used in the apocryphal Chinese curse "may you live in interesting times&quot .

underpants

(182,722 posts)
23. I'll agree on Kasich
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 04:18 PM
Aug 2015

I thought he was the clear winner of the first debate but I viewed in a general election perspective. Kasich will be a good VP pick for them.

Rand was the one I was worried about. A legacy of the libertarian sect with Tea Party cred (turnout) and he connects through the camera. TONS of racial baggage but the press would cover that up for him. The Kentucky issue with not being on the ballot twice was also a would be problem. Looks like he is getting lost in the wash as far as polling.

With this many candidates operations in Iowa, NH, and SC are huge. Also skipping one or two to get clear of the pack could be key.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
47. Kasich is the 1-of-17 that Democrats say "he doesn't sound too crazy." That's why he's only running
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 12:33 AM
Aug 2015

for VP - he's not half crazy enough to have any real chance at the top of the ticket.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
10. Oooooh, that's gotta burn the so-called "serious" candidates
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:53 PM
Aug 2015
and the Kochs to see the whacks rising to the top. Nominate any one of the top three and we'll win 50 states.



Wouldn't it be priceless if Trump, the quintessential authoritarian whack job, got the nomination and accomplished the long-predicted destruction of the Republican party he so ably represents?

Vinca

(50,249 posts)
14. In the words of "The Donald," this is UUUUUUUUUGE.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 01:57 PM
Aug 2015
If Bernie wasn't running I swear I'd cross party lines and vote for Trump in the NH primary. Keep the crazy train on track!

RKP5637

(67,101 posts)
31. He's the best of the fools they have to pick from. He may be egotistical, but he's not
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 06:12 PM
Aug 2015

crazy like most of the others in this batch of republican hopefuls.

underpants

(182,722 posts)
22. Jeb! In the context of a foot race you are getting boxed in to the inside
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 04:04 PM
Aug 2015

I know it's still early but Jeb has to keep himself within reach of the front pack.

 

Wisc Progressive

(51 posts)
33. So much for the "dream" ticket of Walker/Rubio (or Rubio/Walker)! Oh so we can hope.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 07:36 PM
Aug 2015

In the March Faux polls, Walker lead with 15%. In April, he barely trailed Rubio by 1 point (12% versus 13%). In May, Bush and Rubio both lead with 13% and Walker had 11. He was tied with Bush at 12% in early June.

In July, Walker had 15% and trailed Trump by only 3%

Now they have Walker tied with Huckabee at 6%

Good news, America really does not want Scott Walker in the White House, but he is a dangerous candidate and can, by hook or crook, end up in the White House regardless of what the majority of voters think.

C Moon

(12,212 posts)
35. They are all a scary bunch of people, but I'm glad to see Walker so far down in the polls.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 07:53 PM
Aug 2015

I see him as more dangerous than the whole lot of 'em—and I don't even live under his governorship.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
37. What we've seen for the last seveal years of repub vs repug - the biggest racist wins.
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 10:17 PM
Aug 2015

Trump is the rudest and uncouth, the repubs will absolutely vote for him. Until one of these others gets more racists, trump will lead. He won't get the countries vote though. I'm convinced with him running that a dem will win. The only chance the repubs had was bush because he "seems" more humane.

Wash. state Desk Jet

(3,426 posts)
41. Hi Folks
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 10:41 PM
Aug 2015

Last edited Sun Aug 16, 2015, 11:28 PM - Edit history (2)



Is it still about polls ? I'm rather indisposed at current ,it seems the big boss's thought it better I slip out of sight on a well deserved leave of absence, I believe the cover story is vacation. In effect I was given one cold choice ,just drop out of sight.

I 'm really worried I'll get a phone call telling me this is it, your contract is in the trash bin .
I did exactly what I was told to do, I delivered it big time and the whole thing back fired and I think I'm fired.

I fear we have all been Trumped . This is awful. Do you miss me folks ?
This is a living nightmare. !

I just got a text from one of my inside fox people ,it says there is a rumor going around that I'm being looked at for the position of Fox weather girl- that's a demotion -,it's a cheap way of shoving me off, they know I would never do that.
Oh pooooooooooooo.


pampango

(24,692 posts)
55. It will "please a lot of people" on the right. No corporate taxes, more 'right-to-work'. Blames
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 10:17 AM
Aug 2015

foreigners - walls, tariffs and fewer immigrants. Many liberals may agree with one part or another of that but few of us will be "please" with his job strategy as a real policy.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
48. It is interesting how Bush, Walker, Paul, and Rubio have fallen
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 12:41 AM
Aug 2015

and Carson, Huckabee, Fiorina, and Kasich have risen.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
49. Generally, the non-politicians (amateurs) are rising while the politicians (professional candidates)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 12:48 AM
Aug 2015

are falling.

That's a recipe for poor turnout of the base in the general election.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
50. I also think turnout in the general election will be lower
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 01:08 AM
Aug 2015

According to Wikipedia the turnout for the Presidential election between 1972 and 2012 was between 49%-57.5% with an average of 54.13%. 1

The last three have been fairly high in that range. I expect the turnout will be 50-52%, if it's Clinton vs. Bush below 50%.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fox News poll: Donald Tru...