Trump says would raise visa fees to pay for Mexican border wall
Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters
(Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump would increase fees on some Mexican visas and all border crossing cards as part of a broader plan to force Mexico to pay for a wall along the southern U.S. border.
Trump, the frontrunner in a crowded Republican field, has made immigration a central plank of his campaign. On NBC's "Meet the Press," he said he would deport all undocumented immigrants and rescind U.S. President Barack Obama's executive orders on immigration.
The orders, if enacted, could protect as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.
In a policy paper issued on Sunday, Trump said he would increase fees on temporary visas for Mexican chief executives, diplomats and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) workers if Mexico does not agree to pay for the wall.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/trump-says-raise-visa-fees-pay-mexican-border-172052014.html
salib
(2,116 posts)To assuage xenophobic fears.
NCjack
(10,297 posts)hiring foreign workers.
trillion
(1,859 posts)here.
What gets me is how many racists there really are in America supporting this rude crude bigot.
candelista
(1,986 posts)In 2007, your candidate, Bernie Sanders...
...was part of the charge from the left to kill an immigration overhaul bill. Back then, the Vermont independent warned that the immigration bill a product from then-Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) would drive down wages for lower-income workers, an argument thats been used by hard-liner reform opponents."
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/bernie-sanders-and-immigration-its-complicated-119190.html
I don't believe Bernie was ever a racist. His concerns were legitimate then, just as they would be now.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie opposed a corporate giveaway "guest worker program" while working with organized labor.
That is a far cry from the racism and junk economics peddled by Trump and his asshole supporters.
candelista
(1,986 posts)This was Bernie's position 2007:
Deal with what he said instead of talking about what you "loathe," which is a matter of complete indifference to me.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)What concerns me are provisions in the bill that would bring low-wage workers into this country in order to depress the already declining wages of American workers, Sanders said in May 2007. With poverty increasing and the middle-class shrinking, we must not force American workers into even more economic distress.
The guest-worker program proposed in the 2007 bill would bring in foreign workers for two years at a time, but force them to leave the United States for a year in between each renewal. It also offered few protections for those workers, labor advocates said.
candelista
(1,986 posts)Why do you want to destroy all the gains the US working class has made for the last century by flooding the market with cheap labor?
I have said many times that I do not support Trump for President.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)Or do you only want to harm low wage US workers?
trillion
(1,859 posts)Black Lives Matter OMG interrupted him from speaking and he had the temper tantrum saying he would leave if he was going to be interrupted. He learned nothing from Obama who would hear people out - let them speak, and then comment fairly on the issues they bring up. That said, Bernie is the least of the evils so the best person I find to vote for. And yes, I am voting for the least of the evils. If someone comes up with a better voting record and isn't a curmodgeon and has a chance so it isn't another throw away green vote, I'll go for her/him.
tavernier
(14,443 posts)When some spoiled, attention seeking child rudely interrupts an event you have been invited to, where people have come to hear what you have to say? And then just blabbers on without any prepared intelligent text, or any intention of giving the invited guest the time or chance to reply, or have a conversation?
She got a ZERO with me, and with most people who were raised with good manners.
treestar
(82,383 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Turbineguy
(40,074 posts)have actually stayed at one of his hotels.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)What an Ass.
What happened to, "We have no Problems with people who come here legally"
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)herding cats
(20,049 posts)The Mexican government says it won't help pay for a wall along its border with the U.S., a proposal pushed by Republican front-runner Donald Trump.
"Of course it's false," Eduardo Sánchez, a spokesman for Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, told Bloomberg for a story published late Wednesday.
"It reflects an enormous ignorance for what Mexico represents, and also the irresponsibility of the candidate who's saying it," Sanchez added, referring to Trump.
He added that the Mexican government is not taking Trump's statements seriously.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/251023-mexico-says-it-wont-pay-for-trumps-border-wall
bucolic_frolic
(55,139 posts)"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down that wall!"
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)K spouse visas are $265
Green Card applications are $420. Change of status applications are $1070.
Citizenship is a minimum of $550.
Fuck Trump.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I think he is ignorant. The fees can't be increased just for one country, they'd have to be increased for all of them. All that would do is put a dent in tourism, which would be a job killer.
My wife is a Korean citizen and has a US visa. Fortunately now Korea is in the visa waiver program, but even that costs. With as few times we make the trip back to the US I'm going to tell her not to bother with the visa anymore. It's too damn expensive.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)how he is going to pay for the Estimated $4 Trillion cost of rounding up and deporting 13 million undocumented aliens !
hill2016
(1,772 posts)$4 trillion?
Seems to be an order of magnitude too high.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Smooth!
hill2016
(1,772 posts)I'm more interested in fact-based policies rather than just blowing smoke.
$4 trillion divided by 10 million (to make the maths easy) is $400,000. Does it take $400k to deport one person?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)zero-tolerance state for those without immigration papers.
Not to mention the massive hit to the economy, including lost tax revenue.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)$4 trillion seems an order of magnitude too high. So $250b would be the direct cost of deportations?
And most of this $4 trillion would come from lost tax revenue?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Plus $250 billion/year in reduced economic output.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118602/deporting-all-undocumented-immigrants-would-cost-billions-immigration
treestar
(82,383 posts)As after all that cost, they can just come back.
Showing the weakness in modern times of the idea of deportation.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)sinkingfeeling
(57,835 posts)Americans for living in their country. We already have pissed off most of South America with our visa charges. Planning a trip to Brazil, Argentina, and Chile. All 3 have added charges for American tourists because we charge their tourists to come here.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)is highly in question.
matt819
(10,749 posts)First of all, illegal immigration by Mexicans is on the decline. I read recently that there has been a net decline in Mexican illegal immigration as well (more leaving than arriving). Larger numbers are coming from Central America. What they hell, though, they all look alike, right?
Next, Trump raises fees. The Mexicans raise fees. We raise fees more, etc.
Same with customs duties. You end with a (sorry, I can't resist) Mexican standoff.
And, guess what, everyone loses.
Looks like those generals on MTP haven't yet discussed this issue, so Trump has no idea what it's all about. Hell, even if he watches those generals on MTP, he still doesn't know what it's all about.
Damn, there goes 2 minutes of my life I can't get back. And all thanks to Trump.