Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ptah

(33,023 posts)
Thu May 10, 2012, 01:44 PM May 2012

Montana judge rules teen birth control coverage ban unconstitutional

Source: Missoulian.com {Montana}

HELENA – A Helena district judge has declared unconstitutional the state’s ban on prescription birth control
coverage for teenage girls covered under the state’s health insurance program for low-income people.

District Judge James Reynolds concluded that the state contraceptive ban for teenage girls in the Healthy Montana
Kids Program “violates the right of privacy and the rights of persons not adults set forth in the Montana Constitution.”

The Healthy Montana Kids program, formerly known as the Children’s Health Insurance Program,
insures children with family incomes up 250 percent of the federal poverty level.

“The state has failed to provide a compelling state reason for this exclusion and has failed to show how
this exclusion enhances the rights of persons not adults,” Reynolds said. “Rather, as the court determined
and as the state itself declared: reducing teenage pregnancy (is) a compelling state interest.”




Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/local/montana-judge-rules-teen-birth-control-coverage-ban-unconstitutional/article_8f07b27e-9a1a-11e1-8e03-001a4bcf887a.html



reducing teenage pregnancy (is) a compelling state interest.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montana judge rules teen birth control coverage ban unconstitutional (Original Post) Ptah May 2012 OP
I've been very surprised by Montana recently. There are some progressives sinkingfeeling May 2012 #1
Outstanding goclark May 2012 #4
The ban was insane 4th law of robotics May 2012 #2
I am 6th generation Montanan LiberalLoner May 2012 #3
So true . . . WoodyD May 2012 #7
Great news. Go, Montana! EFerrari May 2012 #5
And we're going after Citizens United, too. WoodyD May 2012 #6
Who will rid U.S. of these activist judges? DCKit May 2012 #8
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
2. The ban was insane
Thu May 10, 2012, 02:05 PM
May 2012

just on a practical note: teenage girls who cannot afford birth control are exactly the population that should not be reproducing.

If they do the odds so much higher that their kids will need state assistance and/or run afoul of the law. This is a net saver in the long run.

LiberalLoner

(9,761 posts)
3. I am 6th generation Montanan
Thu May 10, 2012, 02:20 PM
May 2012

We get pretty mad at crap that harms us and is unfair. That explains a lot of recent actions from my home state.

Montana state motto: speed limits don't matter when you're driving drunk anyway

WoodyD

(215 posts)
7. So true . . .
Thu May 10, 2012, 02:44 PM
May 2012
speed limits don't matter when you're driving drunk anyway


Oh, for the good old days, when open container was legal and the speed limit was "reasonable and prudent."

WoodyD

(215 posts)
6. And we're going after Citizens United, too.
Thu May 10, 2012, 02:42 PM
May 2012

It's not all crazed, gun-hoarding, backwoods-cabin-dwelling, government-hating loners here. Most, but not all.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
8. Who will rid U.S. of these activist judges?
Thu May 10, 2012, 03:00 PM
May 2012

The way these rulings are popping up, you'd think the number of (R) strokes would be epidemic by now.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Montana judge rules teen ...