Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LetTimmySmoke

(1,202 posts)
Sun May 13, 2012, 02:58 AM May 2012

Two High School Students Arrested For Filming Up Teacher's Skirt, Posting Online (VIDEO)

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LaurenG (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Huffington Post

Carlos Eugene Cain, Jr. and Devon Ewing, both 18, face class D felony charges of video voyeurism after they used a cellphone to film up a Doss High School teacher's skirt and posted the video on YouTube, WAVE 3 reports.

Warrants obtained by the station state that Ewing distracted the teacher while Cain placed a cellphone under her skirt. They then uploaded the video to YouTube and told people where to find it.

The two Kentucky men were arrested after Cain turned himself in to the school principal and resource officer, the Courier-Journal reports.

"They certainly violated this teacher, taking that cellphone video and posting it. It's very embarrassing for her," Jefferson County Public Schools spokeswoman Lauren Roberts told WLKY. "We are sorry it happened. But, the students have to serve the consequences for that and learn a lesson."

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/11/doss-high-school-students-arrested-for-voyeurism_n_1510100.html



Put some iron shackles on their legs and throw them on a prison farm for 5 years. Teach the thugs some manners.
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two High School Students Arrested For Filming Up Teacher's Skirt, Posting Online (VIDEO) (Original Post) LetTimmySmoke May 2012 OP
But if they're CEOs who wreck the economy of the world... Give them a raise! villager May 2012 #1
Or throw them on the same chain gang as these 2 guys. LetTimmySmoke May 2012 #2
I wonder if these 2 are high school bullies as well? Quantess May 2012 #3
perverts Skittles May 2012 #4
As a teacher and dealing with even groping. vaberella May 2012 #5
Yes some 18 year olds exboyfil May 2012 #7
Well said! mbperrin May 2012 #36
I disagree chervilant May 2012 #15
Yes, they would take it as permission. mbperrin May 2012 #37
Yep. This will become ever more frequent if left unpunished bettyellen May 2012 #48
+1 Blue_Tires May 2012 #59
vaberella, your understanding is exemplary and commendable. You are evolved! xtraxritical May 2012 #44
tough. they were old enough to know better cali May 2012 #53
They are 18 and no longer children. nt Starry Messenger May 2012 #58
You're part of the problem. LeftyMom May 2012 #64
vaberella tru May 2012 #68
I would certainly press charges SemperEadem May 2012 #6
+++++++++++ a gazillion n/t chervilant May 2012 #16
It's still on YouTube... Ian David May 2012 #39
NOT - link leads to something else entierly. xtraxritical May 2012 #45
While this behavior is totally unacceptable bupkus May 2012 #8
If the statute of limitations had not run out exboyfil May 2012 #10
Journalist reporting a little sloppy on another exboyfil May 2012 #9
To some people seeing underwear is "privates" hobbit709 May 2012 #12
Seriously? blackspade May 2012 #17
I am pointing out that she should be wearing underwear exboyfil May 2012 #19
You are still blaming the victim for "making (the perps) uncomfortable" obamanut2012 May 2012 #22
Google it exboyfil May 2012 #26
how would they know she isn't wearing underwear Goblinmonger May 2012 #69
I commend you. noamnety May 2012 #20
+1. Nt awoke_in_2003 May 2012 #41
Dress code violation?! obamanut2012 May 2012 #21
Expectations for teachers has changed over time davsand May 2012 #54
Life is rough, ...... dress for it, already! meti57b May 2012 #11
"Life is rough, ...... dress for it, already!" greiner3 May 2012 #14
There are a lot of right wingers on DU, they just call themselves Democrats. n/t A Simple Game May 2012 #47
wtf obamanut2012 May 2012 #23
What a ridiculous comment. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2012 #25
Skirt and heels is often in the teaching dress code. knitter4democracy May 2012 #28
Maybe I'm just old and out of touch.... Doc Holliday May 2012 #31
Wow...your post only survived because Lucky Luciano May 2012 #30
Appalling obamanut2012 May 2012 #35
No ... not sexist at all.............just practical advice. meti57b May 2012 #55
I was going to post the same thing about wearing a skirt... Gormy Cuss May 2012 #38
No, it's not the teacher's fault ..... but: meti57b May 2012 #62
Insert "rape" for "filming up her skirt" Goblinmonger May 2012 #70
So, she was asking for it. Nt awoke_in_2003 May 2012 #43
People should remind Romney supporters Sanity Claws May 2012 #13
In this case the perverts are both 18 years old slackmaster May 2012 #18
Yeah, really? You are tough. What about Romney? xtraxritical May 2012 #46
Yes, Romney should be held accountable for the assault(s) he committed in prep school. slackmaster May 2012 #51
String 'em up! tabasco May 2012 #24
Should they be held responsible at all? The Velveteen Ocelot May 2012 #27
Misdemeanor conviction. tabasco May 2012 #40
I can't believe that at least one DUer thinks Doc Holliday May 2012 #32
This thread is horrifying obamanut2012 May 2012 #34
Tell me, Mr. Non-Crack User tabasco May 2012 #42
You do realize they are adults and this is a form of sexual assault? obamanut2012 May 2012 #33
Right, let's felonize and lock people up for crimes we deem they may commit in the future. xtraxritical May 2012 #49
No, but put them in prison for this felony obamanut2012 May 2012 #66
How many years in prison should they serve? Comrade Grumpy May 2012 #60
I guess the judge or jury will decide that obamanut2012 May 2012 #67
In Singapore... LetTimmySmoke May 2012 #61
What if they were 19 Goblinmonger May 2012 #71
It's against the law, and they should be held accountable. knitter4democracy May 2012 #29
Please see post #5 near the top. eom xtraxritical May 2012 #50
What the fuck is up with all the posts blaming the teacher. LetTimmySmoke May 2012 #52
Hell, I'm just surprised no one has complained that she was so boring she drove them to do it. Starry Messenger May 2012 #56
Perverts! lock 'em up! Odin2005 May 2012 #57
There are better ways of dealing with perverts slackmaster May 2012 #65
Right now, I am watching a show on Lifetime called RebelOne May 2012 #63
Future pedophiles. alp227 May 2012 #72
I'm sorry LetTimmySmoke this isn't Latest breaking news LaurenG May 2012 #73
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. But if they're CEOs who wreck the economy of the world... Give them a raise!
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:14 AM
May 2012

n/t

 

LetTimmySmoke

(1,202 posts)
2. Or throw them on the same chain gang as these 2 guys.
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:24 AM
May 2012

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
3. I wonder if these 2 are high school bullies as well?
Sun May 13, 2012, 04:20 AM
May 2012

I can't imagine that not being the case.

Skittles

(171,709 posts)
4. perverts
Sun May 13, 2012, 04:48 AM
May 2012

sorry but they are perverts

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
5. As a teacher and dealing with even groping.
Sun May 13, 2012, 05:45 AM
May 2012

I can say that I would never file charges on these kids. Unless if I do, it's not to press charges. But to give them a good scare. But i would never go through with it. I would demand the video off line and I would have them expelled...but to have a criminal record that will follow these kids for eternity? Never. I can't ever ruin a kids life like that. Kids do super stupid things. Some worse than others. This is a minor issue for me.

exboyfil

(18,359 posts)
7. Yes some 18 year olds
Sun May 13, 2012, 07:03 AM
May 2012

assault and batter a kid and cut off his hair.

As far as I am concerned, I don't have any sympathy for them. They have created an environment disruptive to learning at the very least (not to mention the personal violation of this teacher). That is simply wrong. They will serve as an object lesson to kids in the future.

When a crime is committed it is against society as a whole. Police will often time prosecute over the objections of the victim anyway. In my mind this is one of these cases. I admire your willingness to show mercy - you are a better person than most for it, but, if society is to function, the laws have to be enforced and this is a violation.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
36. Well said!
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:42 AM
May 2012

If these guys haven't done physical rape yet, they're not far from it.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
15. I disagree
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:37 AM
May 2012

Sexism and misogyny thrive in the fertile soil of indifference, which is how such miscreants might view a decision to NOT prosecute.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
37. Yes, they would take it as permission.
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:42 AM
May 2012

Or as a sign of their power.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
48. Yep. This will become ever more frequent if left unpunished
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:43 PM
May 2012

It's real life, not American Pie ffsakes.

 

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)
59. +1
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:16 PM
May 2012
 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
44. vaberella, your understanding is exemplary and commendable. You are evolved!
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:35 PM
May 2012
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
53. tough. they were old enough to know better
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:01 PM
May 2012

this isn't just kids doing a stupid thing. And it's about the state pressing charges, not the teacher.

Starry Messenger

(32,381 posts)
58. They are 18 and no longer children. nt
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:14 PM
May 2012

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
64. You're part of the problem.
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:59 PM
May 2012

You're teaching the next generation that sexually abusing women is okay. Maybe you're willing to put up with it and you've even convinced yourself that you're doing them a favor, but all the little brats you unleash on the world that think that grabbing women is okay because you don't want to ruin their lives? They're going to ruin women's lives.

 

tru

(237 posts)
68. vaberella
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:10 PM
May 2012

Take the video offline? Are you familiar with the concept of downloading? That video is out there forever.

They're 18 years old. They are not kids. A minimum of one year each and no early release. Actually three years sounds better.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
6. I would certainly press charges
Sun May 13, 2012, 06:58 AM
May 2012

giving them a pass or a smack on the hand says invasion of privacy isn't a big deal and that a woman should have no expectation of respect for her dignity.

That video has been cached a thousand times by now--it might be off youtube but it's not off the internet by any stretch of the imagination.

It's behavior like this that goes unpunished that morphs into more abhorrant behavior down the line. What would have been their next level of thrill had they gotten away with this? The grown man should have turned himself in--as a matter of fact, he had no business having a cell phone on in the class room to begin with.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
16. +++++++++++ a gazillion n/t
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:38 AM
May 2012

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
39. It's still on YouTube...
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:56 AM
May 2012
 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
45. NOT - link leads to something else entierly.
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:37 PM
May 2012
 

bupkus

(1,981 posts)
8. While this behavior is totally unacceptable
Sun May 13, 2012, 07:17 AM
May 2012

At least they didn't hold the teacher down and cut her hair then excuse their behavior as just being teens doing wild and crazy stuff, then run for president later in life while brushing off the story claiming they just don't remember the incident.

What I'm trying to say here is, if we're taking this type of behavior to the felony level then there is a certain GOP presidential candidate that needs to be charged with a felony too.

exboyfil

(18,359 posts)
10. If the statute of limitations had not run out
Sun May 13, 2012, 07:31 AM
May 2012

then I would agree with you. Now days I hope the individuals would be brought up on charges. I guarantee you I would push for it if it happened in my childrens' school.

The law is the law. It is a felony. Should it be a felony? That is a matter for the state legislature. The fact that students did it inside a school does not impact on that decision. They are 18 year olds and whether they did it in a school or on a public bus, it is the same thing. They will have opportunities to defend themselves. The first thing is obviously the confession to the Resource Officer. Where they notified of their rights? I think they have some opportunities to navigate through the legal problems and get it dropped to a misdemeanor. In particular the kid who did the distracting - it may be a difficult case to prove against him unless he was involved in posting it online as well.

exboyfil

(18,359 posts)
9. Journalist reporting a little sloppy on another
Sun May 13, 2012, 07:25 AM
May 2012

station WHAS 11 they refer to the video as X-rated and say the teacher's "private parts" were videotaped. Now I am all for prosecuting the students for the voyeurism (see my other post), but was the teacher wearing underwear under her dress/blouse? I got to think that is a dress code violation for the teacher (if she was not), and the administration should respond like any other dress code violation (I would think a warning first time to conform). Just a little nuance to the story.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
12. To some people seeing underwear is "privates"
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:03 AM
May 2012

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
17. Seriously?
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:43 AM
May 2012

Now you are going after the teacher?
Who cares if she was going commando?
That has nothing to do with this incident.
The teacher's space was violated. Period.
Are you saying that she was asking for it?
So you somehow jumped from the 'law is the law' to blaming the victim?


FYI WHAS 11 are the local equivilant to ambulance chasers/Fox news.
If they can somehow manufacture some sort of titilating angle to a story they will.

exboyfil

(18,359 posts)
19. I am pointing out that she should be wearing underwear
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:59 AM
May 2012

under her skirt/dress. I said the students should be prosecuted after a teacher said they should not be in my other post on this incident.

Do you think it is appropriate for a teacher to dress in that fashion? I do not. Like I said a warning like any other dress code violation. Nothing in the record. I said it was sloppy reporting and may not even be accurate in the post. I never blamed the victim. I don't know anything about this other television station other than the report. If the report is inaccurate (which it may very well be), it should be corrected with an on air apology at the very least.

For a progressive board we do get alot of reactionary responses.

Anything that takes away from a teaching environment in the classroom must stop. I can't imagine for young boys and men the presence of a womanin a skirt/dress without underwear as being anything less than uncomfortable. I sure would feel uncomfortable if a coworker dressed in this fashion (including the equivalent for men even though it might not be as obvious).

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
22. You are still blaming the victim for "making (the perps) uncomfortable"
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:21 AM
May 2012

Even if she WASN'T wearing underwear, how the hell would anyone know, and how the hell is it a dress code violation? Or how is it her fault.

Wow. Your posts in this thread are rather appalling.

exboyfil

(18,359 posts)
26. Google it
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:40 AM
May 2012

It is stated policy that lack of underwear should not be observable in several different school districts. I don't know if it was observable or not, and maybe I am a misogynist as other folks have claimed. I live in a house full of females (a wife and two daughters). None would be caught dead in public without underwear. I don't enforce it - I have never brought it up with my daughters, but I have always told them to dress modestly (and I would say the same if I had boys).


I did not let the students off for their behavior. I am saying go ahead and prosecute them for the felony which is more severe than many who say that it is a shame to ruin their lives. Some have moved to the next step and say that they are being prosecuted because they are black. I did not know their race when I decided they should be prosecuted only their age (18) and alleged actions.

I am saying the principal should say (if it was the case she was not wering underwear) that it would be a good practice to start wearing it. Maybe they do not have a dress code for this unlike many other school districts. I guess I never thought it should be something that needs to be said to a teacher. If it was not the case, then the television station who did the story I referenced should do an on air apology to the teacher.

Should teachers even have dress codes?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
69. how would they know she isn't wearing underwear
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:18 PM
May 2012

in order to feel uncomfortable? After they filmed up her skirt? That's a little too late to be making claims that she made them feel uncomfortable ("We thought we would just get video of her underwear not her vagina. Ick. I'm uncomfortable.&quot

Stop blaming the victim. It is disgusting.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
20. I commend you.
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:07 AM
May 2012

it's rare that I see a post on DU that has such an impressive compilation of bizarre assumptions and misogyny wrapped up so concisely.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
41. +1. Nt
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:18 PM
May 2012

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
21. Dress code violation?!
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:17 AM
May 2012


What a unique way to blame the victim.

davsand

(13,446 posts)
54. Expectations for teachers has changed over time
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:05 PM
May 2012
Rules for a teacher in 1915:

1.You will not marry during the term of your contract. You are not to keep company with men.
2.You must be home between the hours of 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. unless attending a school function.
3.You may not loiter downtown in any ice cream stores.
4.You may not travel beyond the city limits unless you have permission of the chairmen of the board.
5.You may not smoke cigarettes.
6.You may not under any circumstances dye your hair.
7.You may not dress in bright colors.
8.You may not ride in a carriage or automobile with any man unless he be your father or brother.
9.You must wear at least two petticoats.
10.Your dresses must not be any shorter than 2 inches above the ankles.


http://www.cedu.niu.edu/blackwell/oneroom/aboutTeachers.shtml

We all probably look at that list from 1915 and find it strange, but that is fairly representative of the expectations placed on female teachers in that time. I was a product of a midwestern public school system starting in 1966. I remember my dad, a school board member, coming home and talking about a debate a a meeting regarding teachers wearing pant suits to school. Some of the older board members felt that only dresses were appropriate attire for female teachers.

My point?

Because teachers are held up by many as some sort of moral example, there are sometimes expectations placed on them that really have NOTHING to do with their ability to teach a classroom full of kids with a wide range of skills and interests. As the parent of a high school aged daughter, I'm a lot more interested in how much ability they have as a teacher than I am in what underwear a teacher wears--if any. As long as everything is covered that needs to be, I really don't spend a lot of energy worrying if the male art teacher or the female biology teacher is wearing undergarments and what kind they are.

It is almost 100 years ago that the one room school houses required multiple petticoats and dresses no shorter than two inches above the ankles. I'd like to think we are beyond that now.


Laura

meti57b

(3,584 posts)
11. Life is rough, ...... dress for it, already!
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:03 AM
May 2012

Why would anyone wear a skirt on a teaching job. She probably had dumb little "high heels" on, also.

And yes, prosecute those 18 yo's to the full extent of the law. What they did was not only (apparently) a felony, but also stupid and idiotic. What were they thinking.

 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
14. "Life is rough, ...... dress for it, already!"
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:24 AM
May 2012

"Why would anyone wear a skirt on a teaching job. She probably had dumb little "high heels" on, also."

Sorry if I get this post deleted, but sir(?), you are an A**hole!

I thought it was the Republicans who were in a war with women; Sheeshhhhhhh

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
47. There are a lot of right wingers on DU, they just call themselves Democrats. n/t
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:42 PM
May 2012

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
23. wtf
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:26 AM
May 2012

The Velveteen Ocelot

(130,533 posts)
25. What a ridiculous comment.
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:40 AM
May 2012

Many teachers still wear skirts or dresses to teach - and they are not responsible in any way for this sort of violation. Pretty medieval thinking - blame the victim for the way she dresses.

knitter4democracy

(14,350 posts)
28. Skirt and heels is often in the teaching dress code.
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:44 AM
May 2012

I've had bosses tell me to change from comfy shoes I can run in to dress shoes, and while many women teachers wear dress pants, there are schools in which even that's frowned upon unless it's part of a suit.

Just sayin'. Don't judge unless you know what that school's dress code is for the teachers.

Doc Holliday

(719 posts)
31. Maybe I'm just old and out of touch....
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:01 AM
May 2012

....but I always figured that what my teachers wore was more of a standard than an actual dress code. Teachers were an example of what grownups were supposed to be, and their dress was part of that. My female teachers almost always wore skirts or dresses; males wore a shirt & tie, often a suit. It wasn't until my junior year of high school that I ever recall seeing a male teacher not in a tie. (And I was probably scarred for life by the sight of my 27-year-old Civics teacher in a pair of snug jeans on Dress Down Day my senior year.)

(Upon further reflection...no, probably not scarred for life.)

As for even suggesting that this teacher has some share of the blame in this? That's simply the dumbest thing I've heard since one man was acquitted of taking a bribe that another man was convicted of paying. (Or was it the other way around? Fall & Doheny)

Lucky Luciano

(11,863 posts)
30. Wow...your post only survived because
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:59 AM
May 2012

a juror wanted people to see how bad your comment was. Vote was 3-3. Doesn't make sense to vote that way since people can still see the post if they really want to.

Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The suggestion that the teacher was at fault for dressing the way she did is offensive and stupid, but I'd prefer to let it remain so others can bust on the poster for being dumb and sexist.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
35. Appalling
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:28 AM
May 2012

meti57b

(3,584 posts)
55. No ... not sexist at all.............just practical advice.
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:09 PM
May 2012

Dressing for the job is what we did at my office.

We often had to go to the field to check a design problem on a project under construction. The few women in the office (including myself) wore slacks or a pantsuit to work.

Someone who is a college or high school teacher has a job requiring not only knowledge and mastery of difficult subjects, but also handling all kinds of kids and adults. It's not something I would wear a dress for.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
38. I was going to post the same thing about wearing a skirt...
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:56 AM
May 2012

but I would have added this:

because no matter how you slice it blaming the teacher for this is absurd.

meti57b

(3,584 posts)
62. No, it's not the teacher's fault ..... but:
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:40 PM
May 2012

regardless of how illegal and unacceptable an action is that someone does to you, .... you are still the one who gets hurt if they do it. It's always a good idea to think about what could go wrong with what you are doing, and avoid doing it.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
70. Insert "rape" for "filming up her skirt"
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:21 PM
May 2012

and see if you still think you would post that.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
43. So, she was asking for it. Nt
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:19 PM
May 2012

Sanity Claws

(22,413 posts)
13. People should remind Romney supporters
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:15 AM
May 2012

that high schoolers are treated as adults. No way should they dismiss his actions in high school as just pranks.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
18. In this case the perverts are both 18 years old
Sun May 13, 2012, 09:43 AM
May 2012

So of course they will be treated as adults. I hope they have to register as sex offenders for life.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
46. Yeah, really? You are tough. What about Romney?
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:42 PM
May 2012
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
51. Yes, Romney should be held accountable for the assault(s) he committed in prep school.
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:49 PM
May 2012

If that's what you are referring to.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
24. String 'em up!
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:32 AM
May 2012


I can't believe DUers think these students should have their lives ruined because of this.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(130,533 posts)
27. Should they be held responsible at all?
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:42 AM
May 2012

If so, how? If not, why?

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
40. Misdemeanor conviction.
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:15 PM
May 2012

No felony fer crissakes.

Doc Holliday

(719 posts)
32. I can't believe that at least one DUer thinks
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:11 AM
May 2012

that the definition of having one's life ruined means being forced to take responsibility for your actions and being punished for wrongdoing. I simply cannot see these two punks as the victims here.

How much crack do I need to smoke to see things differently? I could always run out and get some....

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
34. This thread is horrifying
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:26 AM
May 2012

So many people pointing the finger at the actual victim, the teacher, and basically excusing the criminals. And, they are criminals.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
42. Tell me, Mr. Non-Crack User
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:19 PM
May 2012

Where in my post did I say these young men should not be held responsible for their actions?

I'm sure, since you are so clear-headed and intelligent - not being a crack user and all - you will have no problem answering this question.

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
33. You do realize they are adults and this is a form of sexual assault?
Sun May 13, 2012, 11:20 AM
May 2012

And, acts like this are usually a "build up" to even worse assaults?

I don't understand why so many people think "Peeping Toms" are not a big deal. Especially when these criminals film it and then post it online.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
49. Right, let's felonize and lock people up for crimes we deem they may commit in the future.
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:46 PM
May 2012

They're all guilty until they can prove innocence, right? Lock up the jay walkers they may turn into streakers and then pedophiles. OMG think of the children!

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
66. No, but put them in prison for this felony
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:06 PM
May 2012
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
60. How many years in prison should they serve?
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:18 PM
May 2012

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
67. I guess the judge or jury will decide that
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:07 PM
May 2012

I have no idea why so many of you are shrugging off this crime.

 

LetTimmySmoke

(1,202 posts)
61. In Singapore...
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:27 PM
May 2012

...they cane people for "Assault with the intention of outraging the victim’s modesty"

In return, they have clean streets and it's safe to go out at night. They don't mess around with thugs.

Besides, the perps are getting hit with felony charges. It's going to be on their criminal records for the rest of their lives. That WILL ruin their lives. I don't support that. I think we should knock the thug out of them with some Singapore Justice followed by some time on a work gang, and then give them a chance to live out productive lives unencumbered by a record that would prevent them from getting jobs in the future.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
71. What if they were 19
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:22 PM
May 2012

and did it to some random woman at the mall?

These aren't "kids." They are adults. They can smoke, gamble, join the military, and vote. Certainly they should be able to figure out that filming up someone's skirt is not a good thing to do.

knitter4democracy

(14,350 posts)
29. It's against the law, and they should be held accountable.
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:47 AM
May 2012

They knew that what they were doing was wrong which is why they distracted her and snuck around. They violated her privacy and the law, and yes, they should be held accountable for that. I'd say the same if they did it to a student as well.

I can't imagine how violated and angry that teacher feels. I know I would. My students say all kinds of stuff to me all the time, and I do my best to make sure they learn to control themselves, and when it goes too far (touching me, etc.), I write them up and send them out. They need to learn that women do not exist merely for their pleasure and that all humans deserve respect and privacy.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
50. Please see post #5 near the top. eom
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:48 PM
May 2012
 

LetTimmySmoke

(1,202 posts)
52. What the fuck is up with all the posts blaming the teacher.
Sun May 13, 2012, 12:49 PM
May 2012

Back, on topic, we could learn a few things from Singapore on how to deal with thugs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caning_in_Singapore

One of the things you can be caned for there is "Assault with the intention of outraging the victim’s modesty"

Harsh, but effective. It would wipe the thuggish smirk off the perps' faces.

Starry Messenger

(32,381 posts)
56. Hell, I'm just surprised no one has complained that she was so boring she drove them to do it.
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:12 PM
May 2012

Teachers on DU are treated like dirt. 18 year old ADULT students in the classroom are learning a harsh lesson in reality. Treating your teacher like some peasant that you can just do whatever you want to is not acceptable and is in fact a class D felony.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
57. Perverts! lock 'em up!
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:13 PM
May 2012
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
65. There are better ways of dealing with perverts
Sun May 13, 2012, 02:43 PM
May 2012

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
63. Right now, I am watching a show on Lifetime called
Sun May 13, 2012, 01:53 PM
May 2012

"Sexting In The Suburbs." It is about a high school girl who sent nude photos of herself to her boyfriend. The photos ended up all over the school. She committed suicide. The mother has written an op-ed about bullying and trying to track down the person who spread the video over the school.

alp227

(33,282 posts)
72. Future pedophiles.
Sun May 13, 2012, 03:42 PM
May 2012

LaurenG

(24,841 posts)
73. I'm sorry LetTimmySmoke this isn't Latest breaking news
Sun May 13, 2012, 04:04 PM
May 2012

Please feel free to re-post in GD or Good Reads. Thank you.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Two High School Students ...