Joe Biden: 'Something is wrong' with economy
Source: CNN
e President Joe Biden warned on Monday that "something is wrong" with the American economy as he launched a Labor Day march here with speculation swirling that he may run for President.
In a highly populist speech that could foreshadow the themes he would highlight on the campaign trail, Biden said workers have been "clobbered" in the modern economy.
"It used to be when productivity went up in America, everybody got to share. The people who caused the productivity increase, they got to share. They got a piece of the action," Biden said before leading a march of an expected 60,000 workers through downtown Pittsburgh. "Something is wrong, folks."
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/07/politics/joe-biden-2016-labor-day/
Republicans won't necessarily hate these comments by the vice president.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)On Mon Sep 7, 2015, 03:58 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Is that right ...Joe?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1200670
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Jesus Christ! What an odious post! Biden is Charles Manson? Hide this shit.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Sep 7, 2015, 04:03 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "Biden is Charles Manson?" Not even close. Leave it.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Odious post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No one is equating Biden to Manson.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Loonix should know better, and had better hope this isn't a 7-0 hide, because I doubt that MIRT will be amused.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Why? Dear Lord why?
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)knee jerk reaction to that Manson pic every single time.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)gives Repubs room to criticize Obama. Hillary (inartfully) tried to do it by insulting Obama's foreign policy last year, when she released her book. For what it's worth, I support neither of them.
Baitball Blogger
(52,346 posts)He needs to 'splain himself further. Is he after higher wages for workers? That's what he needs to put in black and white.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)I like Biden but I've read he's in bed with Big Finance.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)99% of the gains went to 1% of the people.
Response to hobbit709 (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Joe, I know you've been grief-stricken, and I know what that's like. I've lost three men in my family in 2 years. But surely it crossed your nose at some point that people were groaning in misery, turning to drink, drugs and crime and/or living in deprivation and poverty due to the lack of jobs or adequate governmental relief?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)Go Bernie Go!!
merrily
(45,251 posts)I think Lincoln Davenport Chafee already has a lock on the end of the line.
Reminds me: I once heard a non-WASP define a WASP as someone who has three names you can put in any order.
(I don't see a thing wrong with having three names you can put in any order. Nonetheless, I truly hope I didn't offend anyone with that quote.)
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's kind of sad, isn't it?
merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)to those of us who aren't experts in finance but who are, at worst, casually aware of economic trends over the last few decades.
He is every banker's best friend, so sorry Joe, but if this is true, you will only make it worse.
swilton
(5,069 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)working to being unemployed for the rest of their lives, millions more parents and kids hungry and undernourished, and your boss keeps on a sorry bastard of a republican as treasury secretary who spends the next 6 years making bank$ter/donors richer while fucking over 100,000 million people, leaving them in poverty or nearer poverty to keep the wealth of the rest from falling.
While you sat there.
I love you. Always have.
But don't let the door hit you in the ass.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I only wish I felt you are genuinely sorry for ours. Of course, you could buck Obama's wishes and maybe find some comfortable shoes - the kind he could never seem to locate.
Go enjoy your retirement. Spend time with friends and family. But please don't steal someone else's sheet music to entertain with.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Sorry Joe...eight years and you are saying this now?
Day late and dollar short.
Time for REAL change!
Go Bernie!
Bullshit, Joe!
I'm a Hillary supporter but you are 100% right about this!
Blasphemer
(3,623 posts)However calculated this speech may be, I welcome having 4 major candidates (It would become the leading issue for Biden, Clinton, and Sanders, and Trump is also waving his own version of populist flag) address what the country has been calling for, but which has been systematically ignored, for going on a decade. It also best prepares whoever the Democratic nominee is for the GE. While I have not decided on who I am supporting for the primaries, I am grateful that Sanders stepped up when Warren decided not to run. The conversation would be very different otherwise.
erronis
(23,881 posts)has a history of doing right.
Joe is a handsome WASP (I'm guessing about the ASP part) with a great smile (same as the Koch's) and he appeals to all of our human-to-human good vibe emotions.
However, I've not recently seen a match-up with how he's voted as a Senator or took initiative as a VP with the core issues that should be what these campaigns are about.
karynnj
(60,968 posts)He has a great smile, but that does not make him have any affinity to the Kochs -- and I have no idea what their smiles are like.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)...making it FAR more difficult (if not impossible) for people to qualify for BK relief? Slink on back to your Banker Overlords, Joe...no one is buying your faux-populist schtick.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Joe has always worked with them.
I hope he does not run. Those banksters do not need someone to represent them. They are doing better than the rest of us.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)I am not even joking.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I have the same visceral reaction to both of them--that is, if there even are two of them.
Response to closeupready (Reply #14)
appalachiablue This message was self-deleted by its author.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)How many labor rallies did he attend or speak at? Did he bang on PBO's door with ideas to help the job numbers...you know those over $7.50 an hour? He's a nice guy, but a has been.
If I were a better, and I'm not, I'd bet he won't jump in. Too little, too late. And the Hillary crows will go all PUMA on him. (I noticed the typo, but left it anyway...LOL...meant crowd)
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Too bad you were never in a position to do something about it when something could have been done about it. Oh wait, you have been in that position your whole fuking career.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)"In a highly populist speech that could foreshadow the themes he would highlight on the campaign trail, Biden said workers have been "clobbered" in the modern economy."
Really? You are now going to be labeled with a "populist" agenda? Not likely!
The only candidate that I would trust, who has a verifiable track record on workers/issues, is Bernie.
It's laughable that Biden and Ms. Inevitable are now supposed to have "populist" agendas...where the fuck have they been for the last 20 years (or more)???
Nay
(12,051 posts)about folks like Biden, Clinton, etc., when they throw out the populist speeches. When they had a chance to actually DO the stuff, they were hiding in the corner somewhere, doing deals with the 1%.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)the House and Senate of the United States. IMO, that disastrous step is owned by every senator and house member who did not take steps or bring a bill before Congress to remove the problem. We the people kept waiting and waiting for members of the Obama Administration to go before the American people, like they did during the 2008 campaign and ask that We demand that our elected representative return to the policies of FDR. Now Biden speaks to the Great Mistake. Now he goes to We the People. He is too late for my consideration. The election results of 2010 reflect that waiting anger. Now there is anger at both the, do little, to do nothing, two political parties. Everyone knows that Sander's, had to, move into the Democratic Party.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,161 posts)better think again.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)Exactly.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I would welcome him to the race to give Hillary more trouble.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)shot down
Salviati
(6,059 posts)
It has not been true literally longer than I've been alive. Joe's a nice guy, but I hope he won't be offended that I don't really trust anyone who's not at least advocating pretty major changes to solve this problem. Fiddling with the knobs on the status quo will not undo 4 decades of corporate greed.
erronis
(23,881 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Salviati
(6,059 posts)I've seen similar graphs in a lot of places, just google wages productivity graph and you'll find scores. I like this one because it does show how closely they tracked before the 70's. It's useful to know for how long we've been suffering from this problem.
merrily
(45,251 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)Biden eats babies thread. I was off by a day.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)He is simply owned body and soul by the banking industry. His other unforgivable sin was the Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1994.
merrily
(45,251 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)reading stuff here, eh.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)But I get a hint of "We have to throw a (little) bone to the little people, they are starting to talk about tearing the system down!!"
Tear. It. Down. It's killing all of us.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Call them out or walk over to each one of them with a reporter and ask each Congressman directly.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)They can start with the Ds, a group at a time. Let each Member of Congress state to the people, they 'will or will not' raise the Federal minimum wage for Americas workers.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)Young people are having a terrible time getting any kind of full-time job.
Christ, I'm for Hillary, and I'll vote for Bernie if he is the nominee, but I think Biden is clueless.
MADem
(135,425 posts)issues are.
He's going to have a little trouble if he tries to go populist on this go-round.
No one wanted him the last two times he tried for the brass ring, and then, right in the thick of it, look what's coming out:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/16/kerry-washington-anita-hill_n_7594876.html
I wouldn't look for Greg Kinnear to paint him sympathetically. I think we'll have a judge/jury/executioner portrayal (Bros before...whatever) and Biden will come off looking like a patronizing, sexist pig who withheld witnesses in order to "go easy" on Clarence Thomas.
The take away? All of the shitty Supreme Court decisions that Thomas participated in? Thanks a LOT, Joe. YOU gave him to us. If you'd held a fair hearing, he wouldn't have been elected dog catcher.
Even Obama says he would NOT have voted to confirm Clarence Thomas.
erronis
(23,881 posts)I'm looking for the obligatory cameo by Biden.
So, Joe. Are you just another republican in liberal cloth? The religious right showed us all how easy it was to pack the feral government with true believers.
MADem
(135,425 posts)As will Wendell Pierce, who I am quite sure will hit it out of the park as Clarence. And we already know Ms. Washington can bring it home--she's going to kick it as Anita.
This is going to be "must see TV."
Greg Kinnear is a rather astounding actor, he doesn't get credit, but he isn't afraid of difficult or icky roles-- he played "Hogan" (of Hogan's Heroes) in the rather dark film about Bob Crane and his sex-addicted, tons of videos life that kind of put an EWWWWWWWW on the reruns of that program after he was murdered. The guy can act and he's pretty fearless. Can't wait to see the make up--I'm betting he'll nail the performance.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)while watching MHP on MSNBC. The young lady (forgot her name) just rattled off all the ads & attacks that will make it nearly impossible for Joe to mount a credible campaign. That's very concerning, because he was my #2.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's still on the internet.
It's not like people won't look, and see, and remember. Once reminded, it's a problem, one of many.
Biden survived because he had the cover of Obama, who would say "Well, I differ with Joe on blahblah, and I'm the POTUS candidate, not him."
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)Joe's heart is in the right place, but his mouth oftentimes blurs that fact. This is disappointing. All the Anita Hill stuff comes back with JB, as well as the credit card stuff. I know his son's wish was for him to run, but I have my doubts now. He'll be eaten alive by the M$M.
MADem
(135,425 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)JFC,
Well I guess if the economy were doing good there would be one less issue to rile up the unwashed with. So things must stay the way they are, right?
Unfortunately, this is issue comes up every presidential election. Wonder why?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)One thing wrong with the economy is politicians doing the bidding of the big banks. You know, like you did while you were in the senate and pushed through "bankruptcy reform" that made billions for banks but utterly screwed over the poor and middle class.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)who are financially stressed much MORE difficult to access, by instituting a statutory means test for Chapter 7 filings ("fresh start" bankruptcies) where previously, no means test existed.
Textbook example of elitism, really.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)For corporations, meaning folks like Donald Trump could continue to benefit from the law.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)I love you Joe, but just go home and rest.
coyote
(1,561 posts)Go away Joe...the economy has been fucked for the plebes for decades.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Bernie Lite, Bernie Fake, Bernie Trump, whatever. Even Jeb has attempted a bit of Bernie.
I'm going with the real deal.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)They need somebody to say some of the words without actually meaning them.
Triangulation for the status quo!
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)No one.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)The corporate media want to have a safe personality-based horserace to "report" on.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)but it's not going to happen. Biden won't run, and if he does, he's too centrist to take much support from Sanders and too late to the game to beat Clinton on campaign infrastructure, endorsements, and fundraising so cannot overtake her either.
I think he's Bradley '08, but -- as a sitting VP -- he generates more news stories about "the Democratic Party in crisis." Biden won't get the nomination, but his candidacy makes a Sanders upset victory less likely while making Clinton a weaker candidate in the general election if she wins. Pretty much a lose-lose-lose.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)only for the corporate media and Republicans.
Igel
(37,535 posts)The industrial economy didn't work like the one that preceded it.
The one that followed the industrial revolution in the early 1800s didn't work like the one that preceded it.
The capitalist one that resulted in the post-mercantilist era didn't work like the one that preceded it.
Productivity is concentrated. Some sectors have productivity increases because of smarter organization and not worker efficiency per se. Or because some machine has made a skilled worker into a vastly more productive semi-skilled worker--with the productivity attributable not to the worker but to the machine designer and purchaser.
Moreover, the industrial side has seen vast increases in productivity but other sectors have seen smaller or virtual no gains. I'm not sure burger flippers are more productive now than 30 years ago; if so, much of that will be not because they can produce more burgers but because of things around them that are designed differently or because supply changes reduce the cost per burger.
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)We seem to have broken the mold on VP's since Cheney, so what's to stop a Sanders/Biden ticket? For one, he has the Foreign Policy chops/relationships, and a good chunk of Obama's POC voting block on legacy. It would also be a good exercise in party unity that will be needed in the General.
Just a thought... wondering if this might be Joe's play.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)to help the party, please do one or both of the following:
(1) make a speech on income equality in which you acknowledge that Sen. Sanders has made this a theme of both his entire career and his current presidential campaign; help Sanders bring his message to a larger audience;
(2) make a speech on the blatant hypocrisy of the right-wing media for manufacturing a private-email-server attack on Clinton when Bush-Cheney did the same, John Ellis "Jeb" Bush did the same, Scott Walker did the same, Marko Rubio did the same, Chris Christie did the same, Rick Perry did the same, Piyush "Bobby" Jindal did the same, etc.
If you want to help the party and honor your worthy legacy, help the party by bolstering its excellent candidates (Martin O'Malley could use a shout out, too) but don't put yourself in the spoiler position of Bradley '00 or Kennedy '80. Don't go out as a spoiler.
swilton
(5,069 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)"Something is wrong" doesn't begin to say it. If you want to run with Eliz. Warren, get her out there to state the obvious.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Too bad he can't talk our president out of TPP and every free trade agreement he signed.
Skittles
(171,716 posts)or has he been too busy whoring for the financial industry?
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)What could be wrong?
Doingto
(135 posts)Inexplicably.