California Assembly approves right-to-die legislation
Source: LA Times
The state Assembly on Wednesday approved a measure that would allow California physicians to prescribe life-ending drugs to terminally ill patients, sending the proposal to the Senate, which had previously approved a similar bill
Modeled on a law in Oregon, the measure by Assemblywoman Susan Talamantes Eggman (D-Stockton) sparked an emotional debate, with many Republicans saying that it is immoral to assist in a suicide, but with supporters arguing that terminally ill Californians should have a choice to die peacefully without pain.
"I am committed to this issue of people being able to die on their own terms,'' said Eggman, a university professor with expertise in end-of-life care.
The legislation passed by a vote of 42-33 after Assembly members offered passionate, often deeply personal, arguments both in favor and against the bill.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-ln-california-lawmakers-vote-on-right-to-die-legislation-20150909-story.html
Omaha Steve
(99,737 posts)K&R!
OS
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)I hope you are not in a great deal of pain. If it was legal in NE, are you saying you'd take advantage (when the time comes)?
I have a full bottle of Lorazepam in reserve. When I get a new one I use the old one and save the new one. If I ever need to make a quick exit, I'm not going to get anyone's permission. Just do It! A nice completely painless way to go.
Omaha Steve
(99,737 posts)PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)if they no longer choose to. Compassionate euthanasia should be the law of the land. I know I would want it to be there if I were ever to become a terminal case. I would be angry if I had to take my own life through violent or uncertain means if it came down to it.
I don't see why hospitals can't put you under like they do with surgery and give you enough of a lethal drug to stop your heart so that you don't feel anything once your are under. You wouldn't feel a thing and it would be completely peaceful and painless. I hope this becomes law before I get old, because I really would like this option.
stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)It would relieve a lot of worry to know I can get the job done right when the time comes.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)It is unconscionable to force people to die in agony without control or dignity or choice when we have the power to change that. Even responsible dog and cat owners know when to let go, but we withhold that mercy from people who are often outrught begging for it.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Our grave objection (pun intended ) in pictorial form:
edit: Much more here (yes, that's me debating Brittany Maynard's widower (not "husband" ):
http://cpa.ds.npr.org/kalw/audio/2015/08/150831cv.mp3
harrose
(380 posts)Why shouldn't I be able to end my life even if not terminally ill? Don't I deserve the ability to die with dignity even if I'm not terminal? Or do I have to go out and do it on my own (with all the attendant problems that that causes -- body discovery by family, mess, etc.)?
olddots
(10,237 posts)are a legal hodge podge of money making bullshit .We all feel that we can own people's fates .This is a step in the logical direction but at the same time Steve I want you to outlast me .