DUI felon pardoned by Mississippi governor facing new charges
Last edited Tue May 15, 2012, 12:07 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: CNN
One of the men controversially pardoned earlier this year by Mississippi's outgoing governor could land back behind bars after being charged with driving drunk and causing an accident that killed an 18-year-old woman.
A Pontotoc County, Mississippi, grand jury has charged Harry Bostick with drunken driving leading to a death, felony drunken driving and fleeing the scene of an accident where a death occurred, according to the indictment filed on Thursday and obtained Monday by CNN. The accident happened in October.
If convicted, Bostick could be sentenced to at least 30 years in prison.
His attorney did not respond immediately to a call on Monday for comment.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/14/justice/mississippi-pardons-new-charges/index.html
Haley Barbour already put his future political ambitions at risk with these pardons, and (error redacted) he should seek a Witness Protection Program immediately. This article doesn't even mention that Barbour is a Republican.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Sad.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)It happened in October. He was pardoned in january.
this is fucked up beyond belief.
SNIP
When he received the pardon in January, the convicted DUI felon still sat in an Oxford, Mississippi, jail cell, awaiting formal charges for the arrest tied to that case.
Barbour had said that he wasn't aware of Bostick's October 2011 DUI arrest when he chose to pardon him.
But e-mails obtained by CNN show that the governor's office did, in fact, know about it.
Amanda Jones, the governor's chief counsel, and Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann were told about the October car crash that killed Smith just days after it happened.
SNIP
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Meiko
(1,076 posts)agree that this power to pardon needs to be looked at, very closely.
It's worth the abuses.
Meiko
(1,076 posts)the sarcasm tag or are you cereal?
There's a reason the executive's power of pardon is pretty much absolute.
LuvNewcastle
(16,838 posts)that Haley Barbour sold pardons. I don't think it will ever be reported by anyone in the state, however; the retribution would be merciless.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)since Barbour wasn't under oath when asked the question.
Might be grounds for a civil complaint, but politicians are generally impervious to civil actions for things done in the "performance of their duty" unless criminal actions were involved.