Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:10 PM Sep 2015

Hillary Clinton on Keystone Pipeline: "I Oppose It"

Source: NBC News

NBC News


Hillary Clinton on Keystone Pipeline: 'I Oppose It'

TUE, SEP 22

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton announces in Iowa that she does not support the Keystone pipeline.

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/hillary-clinton-on-keystone-pipeline-i-oppose-it-530326595631



Video at link of live announcement.
99 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton on Keystone Pipeline: "I Oppose It" (Original Post) Fred Sanders Sep 2015 OP
Good. But there will no doubt be some people here finding a reason to complain pnwmom Sep 2015 #1
Just go to GD where this was first posted, but not as LBN for a reason, to confirm your suspicions. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #3
maybe so Enrique Sep 2015 #5
As an environmentalist who has literally bled for that cause The Traveler Sep 2015 #9
Better late than never. ozone_man Sep 2015 #65
Yes. Like what took her so long? NowSam Sep 2015 #29
Lol, love Groucho. BeanMusical Sep 2015 #47
Me too! NowSam Sep 2015 #70
I want to get my prediction here where most will see it...I predict that randys1 Sep 2015 #2
i was wondering the opposite restorefreedom Sep 2015 #7
I dont have a growing list, I have one thing, TPP, other than that I will accept the reality randys1 Sep 2015 #10
i wish the right would shove it. nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #12
No shit, and part of me says who cares what they would do or say. But they go after him when randys1 Sep 2015 #14
and the problem is not just the pols restorefreedom Sep 2015 #16
I predict she has no idea if approval is coming, and is merely doing the logical, evidence-based Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #8
Hope so. You know I do. But the George Carlin in me is coming out randys1 Sep 2015 #11
Love George...but he was, politically, a bit on the doom and gloom side at times. Not an optimist. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #13
He was talking about America. Doom and gloom was appropriate and prescient. Elmer S. E. Dump Sep 2015 #98
I applaud your naivete Android3.14 Sep 2015 #30
Naivete is an understatement. BeanMusical Sep 2015 #49
she doesn't know anything...she opposes it because it is "a distraction" LOL snooper2 Sep 2015 #94
As a Bernie supporter I have to say, great to hear! jalan48 Sep 2015 #4
K&R mcar Sep 2015 #6
Well, it took her damned long enough. NV Whino Sep 2015 #15
The "too little too late" stuff is in another thread. Giving credit where credit is due is OK to do. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #17
Considering the fact that the pipeline hasn't been approved ANYWHERE, who cares? Or.... George II Sep 2015 #19
Great news, but the expected DU reaction is mind-boggling! George II Sep 2015 #18
Wasn't just last week there was thread after thread bashing Clinton for not making a decision?? Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #21
She's running an excellent campaign ismnotwasm Sep 2015 #38
As for the haters AlbertCat Sep 2015 #75
Bernie was against it from day one. Something tells me that she must really be feeling the totodeinhere Sep 2015 #26
Gotta give it to Hillary, she does a great "me too" Bernie impersonation. Sorry, I'd rather have the "real Deal." InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2015 #77
that's what I have been saying all along, her campaign slogan should be... Javaman Sep 2015 #82
Great minds think alike! haha InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2015 #95
doesn't much matter Marty McGraw Sep 2015 #73
Great news! demwing Sep 2015 #20
Her focus group finally came to a consensus! d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #22
Never satisfied are you--as you continue to diss Hillary-even though she made riversedge Sep 2015 #23
Sanders and every other D candidate made their decision d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #81
What is being objected to is "she took too long"?! Seriously, some folks are embarrassing themselves Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #90
Since you know all the answers to HRC's campaign d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #96
You took too long responding to me so I can not respect your "questions". Turn around is fair game. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #97
At least Hillary gave us an answer a few months later d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #99
Good! Iggo Sep 2015 #24
I will be fair DonCoquixote Sep 2015 #25
She is smart, I give her that. sadoldgirl Sep 2015 #27
Good Bettie Sep 2015 #28
Haters not liking this one. Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #31
She should be treated with respect because there's a D after her name? BeanMusical Sep 2015 #50
jeebus. earned every day over and over it appears. mopinko Sep 2015 #78
Well she sure earned the respect of LGBT people by saying that marriage is between a man and a woman BeanMusical Sep 2015 #80
yeah, democrats tend to do that. mopinko Sep 2015 #83
Half the country "evolved" on gay marriage long before she opportunistically did. BeanMusical Sep 2015 #93
I didn't see your concern in threads tearing up Kim Davis. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #51
WTF are you talking about? Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #53
No, I'm saying simply being a party member is not cause for respect. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #55
That's carrying it way too far. Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #57
Kim Davis is a registered Democrat, and ran as a Democrat, and was elected as a Democrat. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #58
Implication and yes I knew Davis ran as a Dem. Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #59
"Implication" huh? Nice try there. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #60
Well good for you. You said your piece. Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #63
And I intend to keep doing so n/t Scootaloo Sep 2015 #64
So will I. Not gonna be silenced either. Kingofalldems Sep 2015 #67
LOL! Rafale Sep 2015 #32
Nailed it! Marty McGraw Sep 2015 #74
+1000 Javaman Sep 2015 #84
And tomorrow she will change her mind. darkangel218 Sep 2015 #33
Finally. At least we now we know which of Hillary's politically-motivated promises ... DrBulldog Sep 2015 #34
Alternative route Geronimoe Sep 2015 #35
Good for her. Old Crow Sep 2015 #36
Thanks for posting! ismnotwasm Sep 2015 #37
Because it's no longer economically feasible Fearless Sep 2015 #39
Oh good, now we don't have to elect her to find out what her stance is. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #40
Democratic candidate Martin O'Malley criticized Hillary for following, not leading: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #41
This ^ AlbertCat Sep 2015 #76
Yup... Javaman Sep 2015 #86
One down. Now I'd like to know about why she supports fracking, capital punishment, TPP, IWR....... marble falls Sep 2015 #42
Really waiting for that TPP position rurallib Sep 2015 #43
It's evolving. marble falls Sep 2015 #44
The Great Evolver! bigwillq Sep 2015 #45
Hillary's House of Waffle... SoapBox Sep 2015 #46
But I could be persuaded otherwise. Let's open the bidding at $18 Million. Do I hear 18? 24601 Sep 2015 #48
Is she specific about actively challenging it? Cal Carpenter Sep 2015 #52
Yeah! AllyCat Sep 2015 #54
Indeed! Who is against evolution? It is how adults grow up. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #66
Her previous position jeff47 Sep 2015 #56
shush, you! Javaman Sep 2015 #87
Yes, accurately quoting her is a horrific right-wing smear. (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #89
amazing,isn't it? nt Javaman Sep 2015 #91
I can't believe what I just heard... Bubzer Sep 2015 #61
Bout time! lonestarnot Sep 2015 #62
11/25/2015: "I'm the REAL socialist in this race" - Hillary Weathervane Shapeshifter Clinton.... Indepatriot Sep 2015 #68
The "weathervane" cleverness has already been claimed. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #69
Good to see all of the Democrats on the same side on this issue Hydra Sep 2015 #71
'bout time. AlbertCat Sep 2015 #72
Good! Gore1FL Sep 2015 #79
Means nothing. Or rather it means ... Old Union Guy Sep 2015 #85
+1000 nt Javaman Sep 2015 #88
Better late than never Bradical79 Sep 2015 #92

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
1. Good. But there will no doubt be some people here finding a reason to complain
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:13 PM
Sep 2015

about how she did it or what exactly she said.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
3. Just go to GD where this was first posted, but not as LBN for a reason, to confirm your suspicions.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:18 PM
Sep 2015

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
5. maybe so
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:20 PM
Sep 2015

maybe rightly so, depending on what she said.

My own attitude is, this is the position I want her to take, so this is good news.

At the same time, it has been known to happen that politicians lie about their positions. Obama lying about his trade stance is a good example.

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
9. As an environmentalist who has literally bled for that cause
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:28 PM
Sep 2015

Yer right. Doubtless they will. For example, I am underwhelmed. People who place environmental issues near the top of their priorities will be less than impressed by her late opposition to the pipeline. It is reasonable for them to feel that way and articulate their thoughts on the matter.

I'm glad Ms. Clinton finally got on board, but she is very late to the party, and this causes me to question her commitment to greenhouse gas emissions policy and other environmental issues. I look forward to her future statements on these matters.

Trav

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
65. Better late than never.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:49 PM
Sep 2015

She has dragged her heels on this, not a strong environmentalist, but at least she came out against it.

Why is Obama for it? Oh, I keep forgetting, he said he was no progressive. He never stops proving that.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
29. Yes. Like what took her so long?
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:18 PM
Sep 2015

"These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." - Groucho Marx.

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
70. Me too!
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 09:09 PM
Sep 2015

I have lately been more critical of Hillary than previously and I know it is because she appears to be mirroring Bernie's positions on the issues. The trouble is, I don't trust her. He has not wavered in his entire career while she seems to poll test every single sentence she speaks.

Hello, I must be going.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
2. I want to get my prediction here where most will see it...I predict that
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:14 PM
Sep 2015

she knows something we dont.

That she has found out the approval is coming, and it will be more popular to be against it than for it, so this gives her a chance to come out against it while her position will have no impact, etc.

I hope I am wrong.

As a HUGE (did I say HUGE) supporter of Obama, I have the cred and right to also be REAL pissed at him when he disappoints, and this would REALLY disappoint, so again, hope I am wrong.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
7. i was wondering the opposite
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:25 PM
Sep 2015

if he signaled to her that he opposes it, and she felt ok about going public with her disapproval as well.

and i agree, if he disappoints on this, i will be really pissed as well. i guess i will add it to the growing list.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
10. I dont have a growing list, I have one thing, TPP, other than that I will accept the reality
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:29 PM
Sep 2015

that Obama has done what he thought he had to do.

NOt crazy about drones, but can you imagine what would happen if he stopped using them, the right would go insane

randys1

(16,286 posts)
14. No shit, and part of me says who cares what they would do or say. But they go after him when
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:32 PM
Sep 2015

his wife says water is good, imagine what they would do with this.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
16. and the problem is not just the pols
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:35 PM
Sep 2015

but all the crazy people out there who think like that guy at trumps press conference. i was sampling talk radio the other day and i could not believe all the people calling to say that they thought the pres. is a muslim and was born in kenya and that the birth certificate was a fake. and it wasn't even a rightie program.

that ignorance is what we are really up against.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
8. I predict she has no idea if approval is coming, and is merely doing the logical, evidence-based
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:26 PM
Sep 2015

thing. And is betting correctly that the Obama Keystone veto was a big, big, hint.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
94. she doesn't know anything...she opposes it because it is "a distraction" LOL
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:02 PM
Sep 2015

good reason Hill LOL


I still don't get what everyone is so gung ho against this pipeline when HUNDREDS are being built and proposed around the country every year...

I still say, just a catchy name...KEYSTONE!

When is everyone coming out against the


LOUDON EXPANSION PROJECT!

It's HUGH!

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
17. The "too little too late" stuff is in another thread. Giving credit where credit is due is OK to do.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:38 PM
Sep 2015

George II

(67,782 posts)
19. Considering the fact that the pipeline hasn't been approved ANYWHERE, who cares? Or....
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:41 PM
Sep 2015

...to quote her Bengazi testimony, "too long"? "WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?"

George II

(67,782 posts)
18. Great news, but the expected DU reaction is mind-boggling!
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:40 PM
Sep 2015

For months we've been hearing the whining about her lack of a postion (indeed, someone over the weekend actually claimed she NEGOTIATED the deal!!!!!), now that she's come out against it there is an equal amount of whining trying to parse her words and find some ulterior motive for her coming out against it.

Yet she still comes out day after day on the RIGHT (that's CORRECT) side of major issues but gets flack from the followers of a certain candidate.

Truly sad. Sometimes I think many of his followers are also followers of Joe Btfsplk from the Li'l Abner cartoon, the guy who walks around with a rain cloud over his head.

Damn, for some every silver lining has a cloud!!!!

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
21. Wasn't just last week there was thread after thread bashing Clinton for not making a decision??
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:44 PM
Sep 2015

And days later when the desired decision was made, a year from the election, the reaction is indeed mind-boggling....but sadly predictable....like air was let out of s clutched ballon. And why? Because now the party is 100% United on a vital issue?

Isn't that a good thing?

It is a very good thing. Folks should accept good news for being.....good news.

Skepticism I got no problem with. Denialism, that is a problem.

ismnotwasm

(41,965 posts)
38. She's running an excellent campaign
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:55 PM
Sep 2015

As for the haters, well they're is no changing their minds so they can go on and do what they do. It is very sad to watch in some, entirely expected in others.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
75. As for the haters
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:12 PM
Sep 2015

What haters?


Disagreeing and wanting something different is not "hating". Criticism is not "hate". People who think she took too long and too many others' opinions to figure it out are not "haters".

It's like religion.... if you think it's bunk, it doesn't mean you "hate" all religious people.


This kind of language just exposes the cult of personality around Clinton.


I think Clinton would make a fine Prez. Sanders would just be better.

totodeinhere

(13,056 posts)
26. Bernie was against it from day one. Something tells me that she must really be feeling the
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:11 PM
Sep 2015

heat from Bernie's campaign. She is now being forced to take positions that her big money backers don't agree with but they probably understand that it is all hot air designed to deflate Bernie's campaign. Watch her veer sharply to the right if she gets the nomination. With her it's all about winning at all casts.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,121 posts)
77. Gotta give it to Hillary, she does a great "me too" Bernie impersonation. Sorry, I'd rather have the "real Deal."
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:31 PM
Sep 2015
 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
20. Great news!
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:43 PM
Sep 2015

but my suspicious nature wanders what she'd DO about it, if it were really her responsibility...

Anyway, for now, big and sincere kudos to Hillary.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
22. Her focus group finally came to a consensus!
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 05:52 PM
Sep 2015

YIIIIIIIIIPIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!

But on a more serious note good decision!

riversedge

(70,073 posts)
23. Never satisfied are you--as you continue to diss Hillary-even though she made
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:03 PM
Sep 2015

a decision that you agree with. Sanders sent a polite tweet and you should follow his lead.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
81. Sanders and every other D candidate made their decision
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 09:42 AM
Sep 2015

a long time ago. I just find it so odd that it takes the lead D a long time to figure out which issues are worth fighting for. And yet she's praised for it as if she's using a complex formula to figure out that pipes leak and pollute the enviornment. Leaders are supposed to make quick decisions. The world isn't going to wait for a president that takes months to figure out which decision works best.

I did give her props for her decision. Gotta give credit where credit is due.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
96. Since you know all the answers to HRC's campaign
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 01:36 PM
Sep 2015

What's her position on reforming Wall Street?

What about Common Core?

What about Glass-Steagall?

What about having more debates?

TPP?

Her server?

Medical Marijuana?

Spying on Americans?

Now tell me again how getting answers in a timely manner to some of these basic questions that are screwing Americans over is embarrasing. I keep forgetting...

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
99. At least Hillary gave us an answer a few months later
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 01:53 PM
Sep 2015

and didn't disregard the question on Keystone. Good to see you didn't learn from her example.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
25. I will be fair
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:11 PM
Sep 2015

I am not known as a friend of Hillary, but if she came out and opposed it, I applaud her. Enjoy the laurels and roses Hillary, because today you earned them.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
27. She is smart, I give her that.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:16 PM
Sep 2015

During the whole campaign she watches
what Bernie and Martin do and propose.
If it is successful, she will join the club.

Kingofalldems

(38,421 posts)
31. Haters not liking this one.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:21 PM
Sep 2015

Last edited Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:29 PM - Edit history (1)

BTW, Hillary is a Democrat and should be treated with respect, as should all Democrats with a few exceptions.

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
50. She should be treated with respect because there's a D after her name?
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 07:49 PM
Sep 2015

Sorry but respect has to be earned.

mopinko

(69,990 posts)
78. jeebus. earned every day over and over it appears.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 11:00 PM
Sep 2015

if hillary has not done enough to deserve the respect of good dems by now, whatever wrongs, real or imagined she has done, i dont know what a democrat is.

and people wonder what we are talking about when we use the word haters.

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
80. Well she sure earned the respect of LGBT people by saying that marriage is between a man and a woman
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 03:23 AM
Sep 2015

only and then "evolving" when it became convenient.



She also deserves respect for her vote for and promotion of the Iraqi bloodbath, but hey, she made a mistake!



Another convenient and pathetic flipflop. Her record is frankly repulsive so no, I have no respect for that person. Doesn't mean that I hate her but this buzzword, "haters", is so useful when trying to counter any criticism of HRH.

mopinko

(69,990 posts)
83. yeah, democrats tend to do that.
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 10:00 AM
Sep 2015

hillary and half the country "evolved" on gay marriage. i guess you would prefer she just stuck to things she said and thought in another time than at least seeing the light.
sheesh.

same with the war vote. this pissed me off then and pisses me off now, and is one of the few beefs i have with her.
but i still respect her. for a lot of things.

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
93. Half the country "evolved" on gay marriage long before she opportunistically did.
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 11:57 AM
Sep 2015

And I seriously doubt that she "saw the light", she just changed her tune because it was convenient and "safe" to do so. Have a nice day now.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
55. No, I'm saying simply being a party member is not cause for respect.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:09 PM
Sep 2015

Kim Davis is a Democrat. As is New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind. Both are fantastically awful people who really deserve no respect whatsoever. But if we're to deliver our respect simply on basis of party registration...

Riversedge is making a bad argument, and I'm showing WHY it's a bad argument.

Kingofalldems

(38,421 posts)
57. That's carrying it way too far.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:14 PM
Sep 2015

Kim Davis is not a real Democrat. Hillary is.

Do republicans get union endorsements these days?

Be real, you know what I meant. Hell if Hillary is not a real Democrat, why are the admins of DU endorsing her?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
58. Kim Davis is a registered Democrat, and ran as a Democrat, and was elected as a Democrat.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:18 PM
Sep 2015

She's a Democrat. She's also a gigantic asshole. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Who said Clinton isn't a real Democrat?

Kingofalldems

(38,421 posts)
59. Implication and yes I knew Davis ran as a Dem.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:28 PM
Sep 2015

Re my original post-- as always there are exceptions such as Davis and Joe Lieberman for example.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
60. "Implication" huh? Nice try there.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:39 PM
Sep 2015

I'm speaking pretty plainly, I think; simply being a member of a political party isn't cause for respect. Respect is gained through achievements and actions, not from associations.

Rafale

(291 posts)
32. LOL!
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:35 PM
Sep 2015

With the price of oil so low, Halliburton laying off employees, and smaller shale oil companies on the verge of bankruptcy, the honorable secretary finally made a decision on Keystone. Wow. Guess Goldman et al. told her they were not sinking any cash into Keystone.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
34. Finally. At least we now we know which of Hillary's politically-motivated promises ...
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:41 PM
Sep 2015

. . . will be the first one she reneges on once she enters the White House.

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
36. Good for her.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:46 PM
Sep 2015

I'm a Bernie supporter. But I have no complaints here. I'm glad Hillary is stating her position and I'm happy with her position--particularly her reasoning vis-a-vis global warming.

ismnotwasm

(41,965 posts)
37. Thanks for posting!
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 06:50 PM
Sep 2015

Although not a surprise for those of us who have been paying attention, this is very gratifying!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
41. Democratic candidate Martin O'Malley criticized Hillary for following, not leading:
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 07:11 PM
Sep 2015
“On issue after issue—marriage equality, drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants, children fleeing violence in Central America, the Syrian refugee crisis, and now the Keystone Pipeline, Secretary Clinton has followed–not forged–public opinion,” he said in a statement. “Leadership is about stating where you stand on critical issues, regardless of how they poll or focus group.”

http://time.com/4045344/hillary-clinton-keystone-pipeline-decision/


 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
76. This ^
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 10:16 PM
Sep 2015

It IS important to listen to others and it IS important to evolve as facts become available....


But at some point it starts to look wishy-washy.... especially when some "reward" is involved.

marble falls

(56,997 posts)
42. One down. Now I'd like to know about why she supports fracking, capital punishment, TPP, IWR.......
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 07:16 PM
Sep 2015

mandatory minimum sentencing, three strike laws, the private prison industry, PAC money ......

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
52. Is she specific about actively challenging it?
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:00 PM
Sep 2015

Sorry, I can't watch video.

Just wondering if this is a typical political, nominal 'support' vs 'oppose' thing or if she is putting it in context and stating explicitly that she will do everything in her power to block it rather than allowing it to pass but putting blame elsewhere, as so many politicians are wont to do...

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
56. Her previous position
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:10 PM
Sep 2015

From 2010:

"So as I say, we've not yet signed off on it. But we are inclined to do so and we are for several reasons — going back to one of your original questions — we're either going to be dependent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada. And until we can get our act together as a country and figure out that clean, renewable energy is in both our economic interests and the interests of our planet, I mean, I don't think it will come as a surprise to anyone how deeply disappointed the President and I are about our inability to get the kind of legislation through the Senate that the United States was seeking."


http://uspolitics.about.com/od/CampaignsElections/a/Hillary-Clinton-On-The-Keystone-Xl-Pipeline.htm

Javaman

(62,500 posts)
87. shush, you!
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 10:27 AM
Sep 2015

she's supposed to be getting out ahead of this issue! after Bernie already said many times he was against it. but he doesn't get quite the press she does, so now she can say that she was against it all along.

see how it works?

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
61. I can't believe what I just heard...
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 08:39 PM
Sep 2015

The keystone XL pipeline is "A distraction from the important work we have to do with climate change"?
So the environmentally destructive oil-sands, a direct contributor to the climate change issue, a distraction?

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
68. 11/25/2015: "I'm the REAL socialist in this race" - Hillary Weathervane Shapeshifter Clinton....
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 09:01 PM
Sep 2015

How naive does she really think people are?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
71. Good to see all of the Democrats on the same side on this issue
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 09:26 PM
Sep 2015

And hopefully she can continue to "evolve" her way along on a bunch of other issues she needs to.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
72. 'bout time.
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 09:52 PM
Sep 2015

Her handlers musta said it was OK for her to say so.

Zardoz only knows what she really thinks.


Gore1FL

(21,097 posts)
79. Good!
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 12:45 AM
Sep 2015

I am glad she finally said so.

While she isn't my first choice, I realize she is the most likely Democratic nominee. Things like this make that reality a lot more agreeable to me.

 

Old Union Guy

(738 posts)
85. Means nothing. Or rather it means ...
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 10:10 AM
Sep 2015

Or rather it means that answer polls well.

Don't you guys get it yet? Hillary's "stated position" on anything means nothing.

When she's president, it will be a matter of who shows her the money.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton on Keysto...