HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Hillary Clinton Comes Out...

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:38 PM

Hillary Clinton Comes Out Against TPP

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton came out against the Trans-Pacific Partnership Wednesday, breaking with President Barack Obama on the 12-nation trade deal that is set to become a key part of his legacy.

"As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it," Clinton told Judy Woodruff of PBS "Newshour."

"I have said from the very beginning that we had to have a trade agreement that would create good American jobs, raise wages and advance our national security. And I still believe that's the high bar we have to meet," she said. "I have been trying to learn as much as I can about the agreement. But I'm worried. I'm worried about currency manipulation not being part of the agreement. We've lost American jobs to the manipulations that countries, particularly in Asia, have engaged in. I'm worried the pharmaceutical companies may have gotten more benefits -- and patients and consumers fewer. I think there are still a lot of unanswered questions.

Progressives have been pushing Clinton for months to take a position on TPP, since Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), two of her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, came out against it long ago.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-tpp_56157832e4b0fad1591a9289

72 replies, 5364 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 72 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hillary Clinton Comes Out Against TPP (Original post)
Raine1967 Oct 2015 OP
geek tragedy Oct 2015 #1
ram2008 Oct 2015 #2
merrily Oct 2015 #64
winstars Oct 2015 #3
retrowire Oct 2015 #5
SoapBox Oct 2015 #8
SoapBox Oct 2015 #6
riversedge Oct 2015 #9
dogknob Oct 2015 #15
Control-Z Oct 2015 #17
Jim Lane Oct 2015 #30
Control-Z Oct 2015 #32
daleanime Oct 2015 #42
Jim Lane Oct 2015 #54
DonCoquixote Oct 2015 #60
merrily Oct 2015 #66
Jim Lane Oct 2015 #69
merrily Oct 2015 #70
billhicks76 Oct 2015 #20
raindaddy Oct 2015 #23
Auggie Oct 2015 #24
ozone_man Oct 2015 #41
24601 Oct 2015 #50
artislife Oct 2015 #52
merrily Oct 2015 #65
Hiraeth Oct 2015 #4
SandersDem Oct 2015 #7
OrwellwasRight Oct 2015 #39
daleanime Oct 2015 #43
artislife Oct 2015 #53
merrily Oct 2015 #67
NonMetro Oct 2015 #10
Blue_Tires Oct 2015 #11
pampango Oct 2015 #12
Bubzer Oct 2015 #14
Control-Z Oct 2015 #18
artislife Oct 2015 #55
The River Oct 2015 #13
d_legendary1 Oct 2015 #22
TeamPooka Oct 2015 #16
dbackjon Oct 2015 #19
Robbins Oct 2015 #21
restorefreedom Oct 2015 #27
Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2015 #25
tularetom Oct 2015 #31
restorefreedom Oct 2015 #26
rury Oct 2015 #35
Maedhros Oct 2015 #28
randome Oct 2015 #29
arcane1 Oct 2015 #56
SandersDem Oct 2015 #33
Post removed Oct 2015 #34
OrwellwasRight Oct 2015 #40
upaloopa Oct 2015 #45
OrwellwasRight Oct 2015 #46
upaloopa Oct 2015 #47
OrwellwasRight Oct 2015 #71
upaloopa Oct 2015 #72
SandersDem Oct 2015 #36
LiberalElite Oct 2015 #37
thereismore Oct 2015 #38
retrowire Oct 2015 #44
ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2015 #48
Jack Rabbit Oct 2015 #49
MisterP Oct 2015 #51
ALBliberal Oct 2015 #57
Sparky 1 Oct 2015 #58
LineReply !
Phlem Oct 2015 #59
Indepatriot Oct 2015 #61
davidpdx Oct 2015 #62
coyote Oct 2015 #63
CountAllVotes Oct 2015 #68

Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:43 PM

1. That will be one interesting vote in February 2016.

 

Obama will be for it.

Clinton, Sanders, O'Malley against it.

Presumably Jeb! and Thirsty Marco will be for it, Trump and Crazy Ben will probably be against it.

What will House Republicans do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:45 PM

2. Flip Flop Flashback

Hillary in 2012: "..we need to keep upping our game both bilaterally and with partners across the region through agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP. Australia is a critical partner. This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40 percent of the world's total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-clinton-pushed-the-trade-bill-she-now-opposes/"

Lol! But I guess it's a good thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ram2008 (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:45 AM

64. We've just seen the flip. We'll see the flop if she gets the nomination.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:46 PM

3. Hillary haters complaining in 3, 2, 1...

Too late
Too early
Didn't say enough
Said too much
Flip-Flop


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:53 PM

5. or...

maybe we're allowed to express skepticism?

no?

oh then I'll just be quiet then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to retrowire (Reply #5)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:00 PM

8. You just be quiet and march your

Zombie self to the polls for, ya know, The Inevitable One because that's what The Entrenched Establishment Crowd tells you to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:55 PM

6. At least she's predictable!

Guess this was where the Weathervane stopped...for today anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:05 PM

9. or...

my--- candidate said no a long time ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:42 PM

15. Use of "Haters?" Check. naming possible arguments as if doing so invalidates them magically?

Check.

Welcome to Discussionist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:05 PM

17. She hasn't been privy to what was in it

once she left her position as SOS. Think maybe a lot of changes were made in the 3 years since?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Control-Z (Reply #17)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:17 PM

30. Any mook with a search engine has been privy to a lot of what's in it.

 

For example, per her statement, she's "worried about currency manipulation not being part of the agreement"? That was known months ago. USTR said it wasn't in, and the Secretary of the Treasury said it wouldn't BE in because the US wouldn't even try for it because there was so much opposition.

Several chapters have been published in leaked near-final drafts. We'll see if "maybe a lot of changes were made" from the drafts that were widely available.

My guess is that the most objectionable provisions are in substantially the same form as they were when she left office. The negotiating has been over fine points, such as the exact number of years of patent protection for new drugs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jim Lane (Reply #30)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:24 PM

32. Yeah, because leaked docs

are so complete and reliable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Control-Z (Reply #32)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:35 PM

42. And we been allowed....

any better information?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Control-Z (Reply #32)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:32 PM

54. The leaks were not denied. I suspect we'll now learn that they were fairly close to the final.

 

In the leaked versions, perhaps the single point that's drawn the most flak is the ISDS. Is anyone suggesting that there was nothing remotely like that in the version under negotiation as of Clinton's departure from State? It's really integral to the whole scheme.

Let Clinton explain to us how the version that Congress will vote on differs from the one that she described as "the gold standard". I'll be fascinated to hear what changes [strike]in the polls[/strike] in the agreement precipitated her change of heart.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Control-Z (Reply #32)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 12:01 AM

60. frrankly

if someone with her connections and power as SOS did not see any bugs under the hood, she is either a fool, or a liar, neither of which offers any comfort.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jim Lane (Reply #30)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:48 AM

66. Shame on you for not capitalizing Mook's name!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to merrily (Reply #66)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 09:22 AM

69. I was standing in solidarity with the DUers who do not have a "caps friendly" keyboard.

 

El pueblo unido jamás será vencido.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jim Lane (Reply #69)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 09:27 AM

70. es verdad, mi hermano, venceremos

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:17 PM

20. Hating Two Faced Politicians

 

Too little IS too late. Your so smart to see that coming. Lol. When it mattered she was silent and trust me supports it. Look at Honduras and the crime she supported there. The fact is TPP is set so now she Pretends she was against it and you wonder why people hate her? You need to take the goggles off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:28 PM

23. Wondering if all the Hillary lovers who argued in support of the TPP will flip as well..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:44 PM

24. I'm not a hater, but it is too late

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:31 PM

41. We'll take it as a positive.

But keep close scrutiny. Yes, it is likely a calculated ploy to draw in the left/environmentalists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:22 PM

50. Stomp out bullying from those who follow HRC's methodology of accusing anyone who doesn't

supported of being a hater - or a right wing fanatic or whatever.

And doing it preemptively as well!

Sounds like the vast third-way conspiracy trying to muzzle our legitimate opinions. I will not submit to this bullying.

Believing she's not the best choice for the Presidency is not hating - got it.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:29 PM

52. Can we help it if WE are paying attention? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to winstars (Reply #3)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:47 AM

65. Which one of those would actually be false again?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:53 PM

4. well, duh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:59 PM

7. If Hillary came out against it now...

the wind must be blowing against TPP....perhaps we have reached a critical mass of objection and this thing can be stopped.

I will give her credit for making the right decision here, but my vote is going to the guy I never doubted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SandersDem (Reply #7)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:24 PM

39. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SandersDem (Reply #7)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:36 PM

43. Or it a done deal....

so anything say now doesn't matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daleanime (Reply #43)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:31 PM

53. I tend to this is correct, saddly. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SandersDem (Reply #7)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:51 AM

67. Or a candidate who is making her seem somewhat more evitable is against it.

I can't take this seriously. Once the primary is over, she'll say she was referring to some tiny bit of it that she wanted to see changed, but it's better to have the TPP as is than to do without it entirely. I'm staying with the description of "gold standard" she gave it previously as being her actual position.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:10 PM

10. Again, She's The Last Horse Out Of The Barn! It's A Distubing Pattern With Her!

It's like the Planned Parenthood thing: Bernie denounced the GOP as soon as those phony videos came out, Hillary about 2 months later! Her campaign people need to have a long talk with her about this. A really loooooooong talk! And not next year!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:12 PM

11. Even though she's been helping negotiate it??

Seems legit...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #11)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:22 PM

12. I have my doubts too but her involvement did end 2 1/2 years ago. There have been many

negotiations and changes since then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #11)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:31 PM

14. Perhaps the fix is in...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #11)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:13 PM

18. She had been.

She had been helping negotiate it. She was helping while SOS. Think perhaps some changes were made since?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Control-Z (Reply #18)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:41 PM

55. This is from 2013

 

http://infojustice.org/tpp


Does it sound like a great trade agreement with only roses and rainbows for the American, hell--- global, worker?


NAFTA screwed pretty much everyone but the corporations who made a lot of money.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:28 PM

13. What They Say

and what they do after being elected are often two different things as Obama has proved.
I'll stick with someone who doesn't have to be pressured to do the right thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The River (Reply #13)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:27 PM

22. Pressured to do the right thing FOR VOTES!!!

Let's get it right! If Republicans won't vote for Conserve-Dems why should I or any left-leaning individual for that matter?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:47 PM

16. The Bernie Effect. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:14 PM

19. Good news

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:24 PM

21. what this says

they are hoping this ends her failing poll numbers.

I see a satregry forming going into first debate.try selling herself as true progressive in race.Hope this scares off Biden.and say
everything you like about bernie you get from me but i have been tested against the republicans.

It would last long enough to win nomination.then she starts to move back to the right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robbins (Reply #21)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:07 PM

27. exactly. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:57 PM

25. Never believe a word the Clintons say on trade

 

Remember how Bill vowed in 1992 that he was going to "stop coddling Chinese dictators?"

Instead, he ended up giving them permanent Most Favored Nation status, opening the doors for outsourcing to Beijing's labor force of prisons and sweatshops.

They'll sell out labor again in a heartbeat. It's the DLC way.

Anyone who falls for this again is a gullible sap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Adenoid_Hynkel (Reply #25)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:19 PM

31. You didn't have to add the "on trade" part

They've been lying to us for 20 years and getting away with it because we were convinced that republicans were the only alternative.

This TPP thing is just the latest scam. She's convinced the thing is going to go through so her opposition is meaningless. She had nothing to gain by supporting it, just like the Keystone pipeline, which, due to the falling price of oil, won't get built for a long time, if ever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:06 PM

26. this is a calculated political decision.

One criticism I have never leveled against Hillary is the one that says she's not smart. The debates are in a week. Bernie is positioned to clean her clock on every major issue. By adopting his positions in some cases several decades after he did, and claiming them as her own, she'll be able to sound like the big heroine who's the front runner to beat Trump.

this is all designed to minimize what was destined to be a horrible debate performance by Hillary and to water down the contrast between her and Bernie. She also gave her self wiggle room in the way that she said she was against it by saying something like the way we know it to be now. I don't doubt for a minute that if she were to get into the presidency she would turn around and support her corporate friends and sell us all out.

and, the lateness with which she made this decision shows once again that she is a follower and not a leader.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to restorefreedom (Reply #26)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:03 PM

35. K&R!!!!

and, the lateness with which she made this decision shows once again that she is a follower and not a leader.


DAMN STRAIGHT!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:10 PM

28. Just the other day, a poster predicted that Hillary would do this --

 

-- with nearly EXACTLY the same wording -- right after the TPP was approved and it was too late to stop it.

Hats off to that poster.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:12 PM

29. "As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it."

 

Is that the same as being against it? I don't think so. She's hedging her bets, rarely a good thing to see but somewhat understandable since she's a politician.

Headline writers get too excited sometimes, I think.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randome (Reply #29)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:43 PM

56. Methinks the headline writers were the intended audience, not us.

 

We're supposed to only see "Clinton Opposes TPP" and miss the subtlety.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Raine1967 (Original post)


Response to Post removed (Reply #34)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:29 PM

40. Is Hildebeest now an OK moniker here on DU?

I mean, I concur in not finding her terribly honest or pincipled, but that name seems excessive...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OrwellwasRight (Reply #40)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:48 PM

45. That is the name they use for Hillary on

Freerepublic. I wish some people would stop carrying water for wing nut repubs.
I think today there was a OP relating Hillary to Hitler
Now there is a silent tribute to the author.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to upaloopa (Reply #45)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:09 PM

46. It's not cool.

I'd alert, but the only time I ever alerted on a reprehensible post, I was voted down 6-0. And, most times I serve on a jury the offense seems trivial, so maybe I am overreacting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OrwellwasRight (Reply #46)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:13 PM

47. I did not alert because I was alert stalked

twice and I don't think the jury systems works well right now

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to upaloopa (Reply #47)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:16 PM

71. Hey lookit!

They hid the post. Maybe the juries sometimes work after all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OrwellwasRight (Reply #71)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 09:00 PM

72. I told someone about it and they alerted

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:04 PM

36. Oh Noes Number Two!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:07 PM

37. Well

weathervanes do come in handy sometimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:10 PM

38. "As of today"

could mean tomorrow might be different. No promises broken.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:37 PM

44. dat careful wording...

"as of today"

nope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:19 PM

48. Good.

Even FDR had to be pushed to the left. I support Sanders but this makes me feel better about voting for Hillary if she is the nominee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:08 PM

49. It's too late for it to mean anything, nevertheless . . .

. . . I won't have to hold my nose quite as hard when I vote in the general election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:26 PM

51. everyone knows she'll support something once the polls hit 57% against

and even more people doubt she'll have any compunction about pushing for it once her hand is off the Bible two Januaries from now

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 11:01 PM

57. I support Bernie but will vote for the Dem nominee....This could end

Up being a "She was for it before she was against it" meme in the general election...ala John Kerry. This is not good. It frustrates me that she will be attacked for inconsistency which in turn makes her leadership skills seem questionable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 11:25 PM

58. Bernie had it right all along.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 11:34 PM

59. !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 01:10 AM

61. More Profiles In Courage from Mrs. "ME TOO!"...no, really, I've ALWAYS been against this........

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 03:41 AM

62. I only wish Clinton would have come out against it before the vote to allow fast track

She didn't have a vote, but certainly could have influenced some in Congress to vote against it. If fast track had been killed then there would be no vote on TPP. I can tell you for sure TPP is a sure bet now that its been negotiated. Congress is going to sell us down the river. It won't matter who is president we WILL BE LOCKED INTO IT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Raine1967 (Original post)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 04:39 AM

63. Well, I'll come out and say it...

 

I don't believe her and therein lies the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to coyote (Reply #63)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 06:47 AM

68. +1

Agree. Nothing else to add sadly.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread