Dems Already Looking At Possible VP Candidates To Run On Clinton Ticket
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by BooScout (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: UPI Top News
Should Clinton receive nominating support at next summer's Democratic National Convention, it's anyone's guess right now who will stand on the podium with her. But it appears there may already be frontrunners for the post. Clinton is expected to name her running mate sometime next summer.
Reportedly among the possible running mates: Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., former Maryland governor and presidential contender Martin O'Malley, and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro. Because the party is attempting to gain seats in Congress and provide a smooth transition from the Obama administration, Democrat may seek a youthful running mate who offers balance in race and gender matters, as well.
Analysts say Clinton may indeed choose a non-Caucasian to join her on the ticket to secure much of the minority vote that was so instrumental in getting Obama elected twice. Other possible candidates who would qualify in that regard are former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and California Attorney General Kamala Harris -- all of whom are black.
Some have even suggested a moderate Republican for the slot, a move that might bridge the partisan gap in Washington. "I've spent 10 months now looking at every single poll and more focus groups than I can count. And you know what? It's not about age, and it's not about demography. It's about the economy," Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., said. "It's about people's paychecks."
Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2015/11/09/Democrats-already-looking-at-possible-VP-candidates-to-run-on-Clinton-ticket/4051447111735/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Boy am I ever so right!
KAMALA HARRIS!!!!
big_dog
(4,144 posts)probably be a mini landslide as well with gains in Congress
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Be funny if Bill Clinton could run for VP.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Probably lose 45 states, and it would never happen.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)You can be president for 10 years. He only served 8.
But he would never do it. I'd like to see castro, but haven't given it much thought.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)My copy does not have that provision. If you are referring to the 22nd amendment it does not say what you think it says. The 12th amendment would bar Clinton from being Vice President.
appalachiablue
(44,024 posts)slot with Hillary the last time in an interview because Bill would be involved.
villager
(26,001 posts)...where many of us are looking forward to voting for her.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'll pick someone else. O'malley? I like him.
murielm99
(32,988 posts)in the Senate.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)But how does Kamala Harris play in the Mid West?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)murielm99
(32,988 posts)Carol Moseley Braun and Obama were both elected to the Senate from my state.
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)Anyone, and I mean anyone, from the northeast would be a big negative. That most definitely includes Elizabeth Warren.
The Villagers (the eastern effete corp of impudent snobs) have ridiculed occupants of the fly over states for decades and they are sick of it. In fact, they are even more sick of the "fly over" reference.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Her closest confidant and ally.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)That's a fact. And not an ordinary one. The Bushes have claimed it often and the Clintons never denied it. The serve Daddy Bush and always have.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I have a gang of fake relatives. Not all liberal either.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Bill is the one who's the "son from another mother".
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)msongs
(73,755 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Blasphemer
(3,623 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)If you are going to look for a republican for VP then you might as well start there.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)are old and retired.
adding a republican to the ticket would be the one and only thing to make me vote third party. who the hell thinks that is a good idea?
Autumn
(48,962 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)lots of guys won't want to vote for TWO women. Anyone, don't reply to me saying that you're a man and you don't mind voting for women, because I'm not talking about DUers.
bigworld
(1,813 posts)I hate to say it, but if HRC nominates another woman, or an African-American, or a Latino, many rural white men are going to bail on the party entirely. She really needs to nominate a rural (midwestern or western?) white guy if she wants to keep that constituency in play.
Unfortunate, but it's true.
crim son
(27,552 posts)I remember when I used to listen to Limbaugh. He always started his rants with "Democrats believe..." this, that or the next thing. While it's true that we need to think about our next VP, it is not true that all "Democrats" are assuming the nomination will go one way or the other. Just a thought.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And she shouldn't be worrying about counting any chickens...
SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)hamsterjill
(17,577 posts)With Cory Booker being a serious contender.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)I doubt she would even consider it.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)cabinet if she gets elected.
Renew Deal
(85,168 posts)But feel free to get a quote.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)none of them," in response to Rachel Maddow asking which of the 15 Republicans running for president she would pick for a unity ticket if she had to.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/who-would-clinton-pick-from-gop-as-vp--561400899953
So which ones would she consider? I mean, it's not like she couldn't have said "none."
Renew Deal
(85,168 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)She has to become the nominee first.
Putting the cart before the horse has been a demonstrable problem the Clintons have had for over 20 years.
Control-Z
(15,686 posts)No one else. It's been a real problem for them.
Wait. Not even. I was just joking.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Lol...she can't but if she could she would. Look for another neocon.
Cobalt Violet
(9,976 posts)Are we that stupid of a party now? NO fucking way!
LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)Who is "some?"
DFW
(60,186 posts)Not that it matters--there ARE no more moderate Republicans.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I would not take one of them for VP.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)I'm wondering who Bernie is going to pick.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)mdbl
(8,658 posts)That's who owns UPI. Wouldn't quote them if the earthquake were already rumbling.
riversedge
(80,813 posts)And other good news for the Dem Party
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017307248
Nov 10 PPP poll SC Dem primary voters: HC: 72, BS, 18 MO: 5 & Hillary WON Debate 67%
This was a sneak peek of the new poll which will be out this am (Nov 11)
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/clinton-biggest-winner-from-fridays-forum-563228227701
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)The Texas Democratic Party printed some of the bumper stickers over a year ago

antigop
(12,778 posts)Gothmog
(179,869 posts)The bumper stickers were printed long before Sanders even thought about running and of course Texas would want a native Texan or favorite son on the ticket if at all possible. Right now the party is officially neutral in the primary process but I do not that Sanders is not doing well according to the polls that I have seen. The concept of socialism does not play well here in Texas and I have a friend who was attacked by a local paper for merely attending the one Sanders event in Houston to see who attended. http://www.fortbendstar.com/2015/08/05/theres-no-room-for-socialism-in-fort-bend-county/ BTW, that event was attended by a mainly white audience with no or few Hispanic voters.
If Trump is the nominee, then we may be able to accelerate the process of turning Texas blue if Julian Castro is on the ticket. Texas will turn blue eventually but I want to speed up the process. One key is increasing the voter participation by Hispanic voters in Texas. California used to be a reddish state until Pete Wilson cracked down on Hispanics. http://www.salon.com/2015/08/20/donald_trump_is_the_harbinger_of_gop_doom_the_devastating_history_lesson_that_republicans_are_completely_ignoring/
Wilson was running for re-election, and as part of his campaign to distract from the economic failure of his first term and increase turnout among his base, he ran on a platform promising to crack down on undocumented workers, and enthusiastically supported the infamous Prop 187, which set up a statewide system designed to deny any kind of benefits to undocumented workers, including K-12 education and all forms of health care.
(He also supported a constitutional amendment to repeal birthright citizenship, currently guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.)
Heres the famous they keep coming ad the Wilson campaign ran that year:
.....Wilsons California Republicans are now a rump party of angry, white Tea Partyers and a handful professional operatives. Its a very sad motley group compared to the political juggernaut that produced Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.
There used to be an old saying As California goes, so goes the nation meaning that California was the modern, forward thinking laboratory of democracy which started the trends that everyone else would soon follow. If that holds true in this case of this Latino bashing, the Republicans are in for a long road back from the debacle of 2016.
Trump's comments on Latino voters are having an effect and are beginning to motivate Hispanic voters to participate. The Texas Democratic Party is officially neutral in the primary race but many people in the party believe that HRC naming Julian Castro would change things a great deal. If Texas is in play, the GOP will have to divert resources that will ensure a 2016 victory for the Democrats.
In the meantime, I and others will continue to work to turn Texas Blue. It is hard work but we will turn Texas blue
antigop
(12,778 posts)Yep. Sure it is.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Gothmog
(179,869 posts)Sanders will not have a chance of being the Democratic nominee unless he can convince people that he is viable. I have asked repeatedly and it appears that the Sanders supporters are admitting that sanders is not competitive in the general election.
antigop
(12,778 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)mvd
(65,914 posts)My only worry is that the ignorant may be turned off by his name, but most of those would vote against us anyway. I assume his progressive record is ok? No moderate Republicans! It's bad policy and their nominee would never choose someone like Senator McCaskill for VP choice.
houston16revival
(953 posts)Lincoln Chaffee
Michael Bloomberg
bigworld
(1,813 posts)All those names are great to me as one of those effete eastern liberals
.
But if you want any chance of capturing middle America, I'd look into a Brian Schweitzer or Jon Tester. Strong agricultural roots, and good, decent people.
Or are we just gonna write off the middle of the country? Kamala Harris or Martin O'Malley will bring no additional states to the electoral count.
Reter
(2,188 posts)My guess at least.
Kingofalldems
(40,279 posts)bigworld
(1,813 posts)Kingofalldems
(40,279 posts)LonePirate
(14,367 posts)That ticket would effectively move CO and NV from the list of toss-ups to the safe Dem column (where they currently reside despite what the media suggests). FL also moves away from the toss-up column to the Dem column with him on board. That ticket also makes AZ a lot closer than before and it would make some Repubs in TX a bit worried, especially if the Dems would stage a massive voter registration drive in TX to turn out the millions of non-voters there.
bigworld
(1,813 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)
riversedge
(80,813 posts)PublicPolicyPolling Retweeted
Correct The Record @CorrectRecord 16m16 minutes ago
POLL: @HillaryClinton is crushing it in SC http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2015/11/trump-leads-but-falling-in-sc-clinton-dominant.html via @ppppolls
down swing as well from 54/22 to now 49/26.
On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton continues to be dominant, getting 72% to 18% for Bernie Sanders, and 5% for Martin O'Malley. ................
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I also like Castro but think the Gov. background is better for a VP.
A moderate Repug? NO!!!!!
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Just kidding. Sort of.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Lytex
(14 posts)The article named the wrong Castro twin. It's Joaquin, the congressman. Hillary Clinton swooped into Texas and met with him and gathered up 90 commitments from national, state and local Democratic leaders. That kind of steam-roller politics disappoints me, for it undermines the voice and influence of the people. It's like our choice, our votes don't count. The message is: it's already decided. Get on board. To which I answer, no. The people's express is just getting started. The corporate model may be shiny and expensive, but I'll take the one that works for me.
riversedge
(80,813 posts)https://www.texastribune.org/2015/10/19/castros-veep-buzz-enters-new-stage-clinton-rally/

Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton addresses supporters during a campaign rally Thursday in San Antonio. Joined on stage by U.S. Housing Secretary Julián Castro, she kicked off a months-long effort to energize Hispanic voters known as Latinos for Hillary.
Enlarge
Photo by Robin Jerstad
Castro's VP Buzz Hits New High With Clinton Endorsement
by Patrick Svitek Oct. 19, 2015 11Comments
If the buzz about Julián Castro's vice presidential prospects wasn't deafening before last week, it is now.
Castro's endorsement of Hillary Clinton for president delivered at a festive rally Thursday in his hometown of San Antonio breathed more life than ever into the idea that he's her running mate-in-waiting for the Democratic ticket. For supporters of Castro, the U.S. housing secretary and former San Antonio mayor, the event provided the clearest glimpse yet at what a Castro-Clinton pairing could look like and they loved what they saw.
"When you look at Juliáns incredible rise, how could he not be at the top of the list?" asked Christian Archer, Castro's political chief when he was mayor. "Theres a clear message when you do your first big rally [in Texas] and its right here in San Antonio.
"That looked like a winning American ticket," Archer added, guessing that some who came to the rally were just as excited to see Castro as Clinton. ........................
underpants
(196,502 posts)Those are my guesses.
Wibly
(613 posts)Everyone is counting their chickens before the hen has laid its egg.
You're all setting yourselves up for some pretty big disappointment.
I will suggest to your right now that Clinton will not be the nominee. I know, that flies in the face of every poll, but this far out last time it appeared Clinton was a shoe in. What happened to those eggs?
I suggest you all sit back down and take a good look around. A lot can change between now and the convention.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,689 posts)The GOP would go out of their way to make sure the Presidential security is second to none. And they'd be extra careful not to stir up their bagger base and the more extreme violent elements within it.
tclambert
(11,193 posts)The VP should be able to parlay the "favorite son" factor into winning his home state, thereby delivering more electoral votes. That's why John McCain should have chosen Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania rather than Sarah Palin of Alaska. That, and Palin was completely unqualified. Ridge might have swung 21 electoral votes to McCain, whereas Palin gave him nothing. He already had Alaska's paltry 3 electoral votes sewn up.
By this reasoning, Hillary should not choose someone from California. While it does have the most electoral votes, they pretty much belong to the Democratic candidate already. A VP candidate from Florida, Ohio, or maybe Texas makes more sense. It might be tough to win Texas, but Ohio and Florida could be winnable and it looks really hard for a Republican to win the White House without winning both of those states.
Kingofalldems
(40,279 posts)Let the reader beware.
BooScout
(10,410 posts)It is the consensus of the Main Forum Hosts that this is analysis. Please consider re-posting to General Discussion: Primaries. Thanks.