Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 11:47 AM Dec 2015

Feinstein at center of move to restrict visa-free travel to U.S.

Source: McClatchy Newspapers

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is leading a push in the Senate to tighten restrictions on foreign travelers to the United States in the wake of the Paris terror attacks, but tourism leaders in California and nationwide argue that Feinstein’s proposal goes too far.

Feinstein introduced a bill on Tuesday to clamp down on a program that allows people from 38 countries, mostly European but also allies such as Australia, Japan and South Korea, to travel to the U.S. without a visa.

Her proposal would require that travelers be fingerprinted before arriving in the U.S. and would forbid anyone who’d visited Iraq or Syria in the past five years from coming to America without a visa – a process that sometimes takes weeks and involves an interview at a U.S. consulate.

... Feinstein’s co-sponsor on the bill is Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-California, also favors restricting visa waivers. “We want to make sure we do that very soon,” he said.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/news/article47430155.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. I can't even rec for visibility. For love of all that's ever been sacred to anyone, primary her.
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 11:54 AM
Dec 2015

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
2. Absolutely agree.
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:00 PM
Dec 2015

DiFi, War Hawk.

I am beyond over her...we need someone new in her position.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
3. Go DiFi! The national Dem Party really needs to for one second,
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:04 PM
Dec 2015

look at how the people opposed to easy access for refugees outnumbers those not opposed by a huge margin, realize that many of the base of in denial of Radical Islam and its threat, and go with DiFi.

a la izquierda

(12,336 posts)
4. Want to rewrite that in
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:15 PM
Dec 2015

comprehensible English, please? Maybe slow down with your broad brushing and breathy hysterics?

vlakitti

(401 posts)
16. Thank you
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 03:31 PM
Dec 2015

Fine statement. DiFi, so called, is on the wrong side on so many issues.And in this case it's egregious.

uppityperson

(116,020 posts)
15. Refugee status takes a longer time, has much more scrutiny indeed
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 02:31 PM
Dec 2015

I have been amazed at the calls to tighten refugee process while leaving visa free travel or even tourist visas much more easily accessible.


What "easy access for refugees" might you be referring to as our current process takes a couple yrs and is quite intense.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
5. So Thursday I was in Buffalo with a couple hours to kill between family parties, so I proposed
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:19 PM
Dec 2015

we go see Niagara Falls. I wanted to cross the Peace Bridge, but I didn't have my passport with me.



and every true Buffalonian knows the view is better from the Canadian side!

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. Not restrict but rather maintain the visa-waiver program
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:29 PM
Dec 2015

for ordinary people by moving to implementation of modern technology (biometrics for identification) to plug holes of opportunity used by terrorist groups. Like any regulation (think stop signs), it'll cause some problems but mostly prevent big ones.

I do miss the old, pre- computers and biometics days, when one could start a new life just by buying a cheap ID and moving to another state; not that I dumped the family and did it, but I just liked knowing it could be done. BTW, we old liberals ALWAYS wanted legislation to protect our privacy with each new innovation that threatened it, but most weren't paying attention, or preferred to just complain.

Anyway, here it is, from whitehouse.gov :

New Changes Announced Today

Given the terrorist attacks in Paris and the ongoing threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters, the United States is aggressively strengthening its Visa Waiver Program and bolstering our relationships with VWP partners by immediately moving forward on the following administrative actions:

DHS will immediately take steps to modify its Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) applications to capture information from VWP travelers regarding any past travel to countries constituting a terrorist safe haven. The Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will identify and regularly review these countries so that traveler risk assessments can be made on the most up-to-date information.

The Department of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and other appropriate agencies will accelerate its review process for VWP partner countries and within 60 days, will provide a full report to the President:
o Identifying possible pilot programs designed to assess the collection and use of biometrics (fingerprints and/or photographs) in the VWP to effectively increase security; and

o Identifying any countries that are deficient in key areas of cooperation, along with recommended options to engender compliance using a range of penalties and incentives available under his current authority including the more frequent submission of ESTAs and/or the suspension of ESTA issuances (new and/or renewals) for citizens of countries that fail to meet key metrics.

The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation will evaluate the terrorism information sharing that occurs between the United States and VWP countries, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, and provide a report to the President of the United States within 60 days identifying options to mitigate any deficiencies.

DHS will offer assistance to countries to better facilitate terrorism information sharing, specifically to include biometric pilots. For example, DHS and the Terrorist Screening Center will assist all interested VWP countries in screening refugees or asylum seekers, including through the application of extensive terrorism information already provided to VWP members and through piloting capability for conducting near real time biometric checks.

The Secretaries of DHS, State, and Commerce will promote the Global Entry program among VWP partners to further expand this trusted traveler program, which includes biometrics.

The Secretary of Homeland Security will work with Congress to seek authority to increase Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) fines from $5,000 to $50,000 for air carriers that fail to verify a traveler’s passport data.

The Departments of Homeland Security and State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and U.S. intelligence community elements will deploy Foreign Fighter Surge Teams to work with countries to counter terrorist travel.

The Departments of Homeland Security and State will encourage and provide assistance as needed to enhance border security and legislation related to FTFs of our partner countries, and encourage more robust information sharing, better use of shared information, and more effective and efficient coordination between our partners.
Working with Congress to Enhance the Visa Waiver Program

The Administration is working with Congress to provide statutory authority for many of the key security enhancements to VWP, including:

Improving our ability to identify individuals who may have traveled to conflict zones to train or fight with terrorist organizations or other adversaries and increasing information sharing between our VWP partners and INTERPOL;
Maximizing the use of international agencies like INTERPOL to track lost and stolen travel documents, and to prevent their usage for illicit travel;
Encouraging VWP partner countries to share information and to use that information in their own border screening activities;
Accelerating the requirement for 100% of VWP travelers to use e-passports (i.e., passports with embedded security chips);
Exploring how biometrics could be effectively added to the VWP process; and
Expanding the use of the DHS’ Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Preclearance program, through which CBP law enforcement officers inspect passengers and their baggage – to include collecting and screening biometrics where appropriate – at foreign airports prior to departing for the United States

o Through the current round of expansion, CBP is in negotiations with airports in seven VWP participant countries (Belgium, Japan, Norway, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom). Support for Preclearance expansion will greatly increase border and aviation security in the United States and abroad.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
8. Are these restrictions unreasonable?
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:30 PM
Dec 2015

"Her proposal would require that travelers be fingerprinted before arriving in the U.S. and would forbid anyone who’d visited Iraq or Syria in the past five years from coming to America without a visa – a process that sometimes takes weeks and involves an interview at a U.S. consulate."

Some countries already require fingerprinting at immigration and many countries restrict who can enter without a visa. Neither of these two changes seem extreme?

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
12. Those who depend on foreign tourists as a business may think this is extreme
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 01:14 PM
Dec 2015

but if terrorists did want to enter they would probably come as tourists or students, not evacuees.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
17. Not to me. Notably, though, people from nations that choose
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 03:39 PM
Dec 2015

to not cooperate with the information exchange, etc., (by far most will, of course) are apparently going to have a lot worse problems than delayed travel or jumping through hoops to expedite handling.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Feinstein at center of mo...