Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:44 AM Dec 2011

US rejects Hugo Chavez remarks on Latin America cancer

The US has rejected comments by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, in which he questioned whether the US might be responsible for cancers affecting Latin American leaders.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland called the comments "horrific and reprehensible".

She said they were not worthy of further response.

On Wednesday Mr Chavez said it was "very strange" that he and other leftist leaders had all had cancer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-16359062

110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US rejects Hugo Chavez remarks on Latin America cancer (Original Post) bemildred Dec 2011 OP
One part of me says this is far-fetched. The other knows better Sarah Ibarruri Dec 2011 #1
Really? What are the "stranger forms of regime change" than by spreading cancer that the US Renew Deal Dec 2011 #3
You might want to read... Wind Dancer Dec 2011 #6
I don't have access to your book right now Renew Deal Dec 2011 #7
It says dotymed Dec 2011 #22
If someone cites a book they should point out what it says Renew Deal Dec 2011 #39
Basically the premise is kenfrequed Dec 2011 #56
Waste of space? Wind Dancer Dec 2011 #65
Oh please. 99th_Monkey Dec 2011 #16
It's a fairly simple question. Renew Deal Dec 2011 #43
What is common knowledge? liberalmike27 Dec 2011 #53
Study Cuba kenfrequed Dec 2011 #54
I assume the poster was referring to this RZM Dec 2011 #55
Sure.. kenfrequed Dec 2011 #59
Oh of course its not impossible but then neither is me winning the powerball its just cstanleytech Dec 2011 #4
Personally, I think the "odds" are quite different ... imho. ~nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2011 #18
Maybe Chavez should look at the Russians. Renew Deal Dec 2011 #2
Yeah, because the US has never engaged in biological terrorism. David__77 Dec 2011 #5
So was the infection of so many Guatemalan citizens with syphyllis, without their knowledge. Judi Lynn Dec 2011 #9
The US is also killing off huge amounts of leftists with heart disease. boppers Dec 2011 #8
+1 JDPriestly Dec 2011 #10
So you think Bush's reinstituting the policy allowing for the assassination of world leaders was a Dover Dec 2011 #11
The rise of the left in South America has been a huge blow to the Global Capitalists. sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #12
Agreed. A huge blow. I also think perhaps there may have been some expectation that we, the U.S. Dover Dec 2011 #15
+1....n/t unkachuck Dec 2011 #91
It's possible, but using poisons or radioactive rays or whatever to do it JDPriestly Dec 2011 #13
"They WOULD do it" is equivalent to "they DID do it" when there's moral indigation to be had. Dreamer Tatum Dec 2011 #14
Is ''lickspittle'' another word for ''conspiracy nut''? Octafish Dec 2011 #25
It is science fiction. Robin Cook beat Chavez to this over 20 years ago RZM Dec 2011 #17
A lot of science fiction ends up coming true. Neoma Dec 2011 #70
I can believe I am targeted for death by bush, or space nazis, or whatever.... boppers Dec 2011 #19
Ah, so you're saying that although you think the idea is absurd, you would approve? JackRiddler Dec 2011 #67
Or I believe insane, and delusional people, kill. boppers Dec 2011 #96
You seem to be confusing the killers and their targets, however. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #99
What did I mean? boppers Dec 2011 #101
Yes, but what did you mean by "it's time for somebody to step up"? JackRiddler Dec 2011 #102
You don't know how podiums work? boppers Dec 2011 #103
The context of this thread made me wonder, but if that's what you mean, fine. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #104
JD, a few years ago, Drone strikes would have been dotymed Dec 2011 #23
Why would drone strikes have been considered crazy? DissedByBush Dec 2011 #45
I was referring to the immorality of killing innocents... dotymed Dec 2011 #84
Who is killed is a separate issue from the method of weapon delivery n/t DissedByBush Dec 2011 #89
We've using man-less munitions for over 50 years. boppers Dec 2011 #97
How do you know others around them haven't gotten cancer? lunatica Dec 2011 #34
Everybody I know, and everybody you know, has cancer. boppers Dec 2011 #98
Low level chronic neurotoxic exposures are commonly used to kill, maim and disable political/ AikidoSoul Dec 2011 #94
Shhhh. Don't let the secret out. COLGATE4 Dec 2011 #27
Sure... kenfrequed Dec 2011 #50
vocalized musing receives a pro forma, news at 11. NuttyFluffers Dec 2011 #20
I didn't think the U.S. was doing cancerous assassinations JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2011 #21
"Horrific and reprehensible" describes "our" dotymed Dec 2011 #24
"All" left leaning leaders? COLGATE4 Dec 2011 #28
I don't really believe this, however obamanut2012 Dec 2011 #26
I think it's funny he got them to deny it. bemildred Dec 2011 #30
LOL EFerrari Dec 2011 #32
How did 'he' get them to deny it? Victoria Nuland was asked a question by a reporter msanthrope Dec 2011 #42
"Chavez' deft diplomacy" bemildred Dec 2011 #49
R#7 & K for, started to bwah-hah but sad, well ya get what you vote for/Venezuela n/t UTUSN Dec 2011 #29
Apply some common sense Lurks Often Dec 2011 #31
Why any response at all? Solly Mack Dec 2011 #33
+1. bemildred Dec 2011 #35
Hey bemildred Solly Mack Dec 2011 #37
She was asked a direct question by a reporter. msanthrope Dec 2011 #38
She should have stuck with "not worthy of comment". nt bemildred Dec 2011 #40
So, having been proven incorrect, you now grouse about her form? msanthrope Dec 2011 #44
"Proven"? bemildred Dec 2011 #47
The best response would have been DissedByBush Dec 2011 #48
I like your latter response, best....nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #52
Um, it was a State Department briefing, and she was asked a direct question. msanthrope Dec 2011 #36
Google is great, isn't it? nt bemildred Dec 2011 #41
Especially when 5 seconds on it dispels notions of Chavez's diplomatic prowess. msanthrope Dec 2011 #51
Assuming one thinks that clowning around is diplomatic prowess. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #57
That Chavez is a clown is something you and I agree upon. The people of Venezuela, however, pay the msanthrope Dec 2011 #60
Your deep concern about the people of Venezuela is noted. nt bemildred Dec 2011 #62
LOL Thank you! I assumed it was during a Q&A, as I didn't assume Nuland was a blurter who had Solly Mack Dec 2011 #46
I don't think she was defensive. More dismissive. nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #58
:) Solly Mack Dec 2011 #61
Notice Ms. Nuland never denied it. LiberalLovinLug Dec 2011 #83
Because the US plotting to kill other countries' leaders would be so very new and unlikely . . . TomClash Dec 2011 #63
It's not even 'conspiracy theory.' It's batshit nuts. nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #64
That's what they said about Mario Savio TomClash Dec 2011 #69
Jeebus. Way to dis Mario Savio. nt msanthrope Dec 2011 #74
Oh please TomClash Dec 2011 #76
Against Mario Savio? Mario Savio died because of AF. msanthrope Dec 2011 #81
It's called an analogy TomClash Dec 2011 #86
Revere? Don't think so. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #77
Read misanthrope sig line TomClash Dec 2011 #78
I understand all that. I just think he is an obscure American and not revered. That's all. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #79
Hm. The Reagan Memorial is thataway. JackRiddler Dec 2011 #87
So I am a republican because Savio is not a household name? OK, nt. hack89 Dec 2011 #90
Who said you're a Republican? Just pointing you to a "revered American." JackRiddler Dec 2011 #92
Well - being reasonably well known to a majority of Americans would be a good starting point. hack89 Dec 2011 #95
speaking of 'batshit' insane, ever see the Clooney movie: "Men who stare at Goats"? marasinghe Dec 2011 #93
As the son and nephew of breast cancer survivors... iandhr Dec 2011 #66
The only honest answer Ms. Nuland could have given... JackRiddler Dec 2011 #68
Seriously if the US wanted to assassinate these Latin American leaders fujiyama Dec 2011 #71
Exactly, if they wanted to send a "warning" they would do something like cstanleytech Dec 2011 #72
Yeah, just like Castro. EFerrari Dec 2011 #75
Yup just like Castro since he is 85 years old the odds are higher and higher something would get him cstanleytech Dec 2011 #85
I think that's probably lost on most here. dipsydoodle Jan 2012 #108
Happy New Year, dipsydoodle! EFerrari Jan 2012 #110
They did try what they thought was a 'more efficient method' sabrina 1 Dec 2011 #80
And the kicker is that each one has done quite well treestar Dec 2011 #82
Well, now I'm suspicious. DireStrike Dec 2011 #73
He's probably thinking of 'The Karen Silkwood Story.' freshwest Dec 2011 #88
Let's not overlook/underestimate aliens Islandlife Dec 2011 #100
Seems like a non-denial denial. n/t daleo Jan 2012 #105
On the basis of this topic, I'm going to buy stock in every tin foil-related company I can find. PavePusher Jan 2012 #106
I still can't believe Nuland is our State Dept. spokesperson n/t Enrique Jan 2012 #107
Perhaps regulations are to blame, as in the lack of. Puzzledtraveller Jan 2012 #109

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
1. One part of me says this is far-fetched. The other knows better
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:46 AM
Dec 2011

than to assume it is far-fetched.

The U.S. has designed regime change that has taken even stranger forms than that.

Renew Deal

(85,151 posts)
3. Really? What are the "stranger forms of regime change" than by spreading cancer that the US
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:53 AM
Dec 2011

has employeed?

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
22. It says
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 09:16 AM
Dec 2011

"read me and learn what the elite will do (stop at nothing) to control wealth,natural resources, power,etc.) worldwide."
Do you actually expect people to read for you?...wow

Renew Deal

(85,151 posts)
39. If someone cites a book they should point out what it says
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:36 AM
Dec 2011

Or even give a hint what's in it. Otherwise it's just a waste of space.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
56. Basically the premise is
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:16 PM
Dec 2011

That these people will do anything to crack open the markets in other countries.

They will facilitate loans to try to indebt countries and when the debt becomes troubles start up.

Leaders may or may not flee with the money.

The IMF or World Bank or their cronies will come in and force the country into an austerity plan where public or natural resources are sold off and developed by transnational corporations while pensions, public assistance, and infrastructure is savaged to pay interest on loans.

Populist leaders might rise up to fight or to demand changes and they tend to get assassinated. Perkins suggests that often the assassinations can sometimes be a deliberate part of the plan should things not go well.

It really is a decent book and well worth a read. I think it personalizes and simplifies some of the terrible stuff that is done to other nations, but it does capture a good deal of it.

Wind Dancer

(3,618 posts)
65. Waste of space?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 01:31 PM
Dec 2011

You asked a question so I assumed you wanted an answer. Obviously, I was wrong.

A simple google search would have revealed a wealth of information - Perkins has his own website, for goodness sakes.

Renew Deal

(85,151 posts)
43. It's a fairly simple question.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:41 AM
Dec 2011

What "stranger forms of regime change" than "spreading cancer" has the US employeed? Please be specific since this is common knowledge.

liberalmike27

(2,479 posts)
53. What is common knowledge?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:06 PM
Dec 2011

Stuff you've heard on FOX, or MSNBC, or CBS, or NBC?

That is corporate knowledge, if you want to call it knowledge at all. This might surprise you, but there are a whole rift of subjects, and issues they don't cover, that they avoid like the plague on the MSM. They never talk about past CIA operations anywhere, but you can find plenty of books, written by agents, who will tell what we've done. They are quite interesting reads. They won't talk much about nuclear meltdowns, or oil gushers, past the sensational phase. They don't clue you in about the negative effects of globalization, in fact, they spin it that we actually create more jobs with it. In truth, if we do, we certainly don't replace the income. And the rarely if ever mention that the destruction of those jobs also destroyed the tax base, that created the debt.ff

So, what is common knowledge? You need to look for the uncommon kind, and our country will do anything, start any war, corrupt any military to start a coup, to get its aims addressed. We are a very, very guilty country, at least our government. Most of our citizens are just willingly duped patsies, who soak up the BS they put on-air, in our narrow, corporate, right-centric networks.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
54. Study Cuba
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:10 PM
Dec 2011

Just for starters. Everything from exploding counch shells to thalium salts to LSD laced cigars to bacillus laced wet suits were either planned or attempted on Fidel Castro.

But honestly our history of regime change through covert ops is a matter of public record in Latin America and denying this or playing cute about it doesn't actually make you look inquisitive.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
55. I assume the poster was referring to this
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:13 PM
Dec 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/aug/03/cuba.duncancampbell2

Indeed the CIA devised some odd ways to get rid of Castro. Of course, if this is what the poster was referring to, it doesn't support her argument, since these plans were left on the drawing board and not put into practice.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
59. Sure..
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:27 PM
Dec 2011

Most of the plans stopped a stage or two away from execution, but there were plenty of things we did do to cuba. Money and documents were forged, crops were damaged,etc. Everything was done to disrupt the workings of this government.

cstanleytech

(28,473 posts)
4. Oh of course its not impossible but then neither is me winning the powerball its just
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 01:10 AM
Dec 2011

very..............very unlikely that I ever will.

David__77

(24,728 posts)
5. Yeah, because the US has never engaged in biological terrorism.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 01:17 AM
Dec 2011

How could we ever imagine such a thing? lol... What is "horrific and reprehensible?"

Judi Lynn

(164,124 posts)
9. So was the infection of so many Guatemalan citizens with syphyllis, without their knowledge.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:07 AM
Dec 2011

That was "horrific and reprehensible" as well, as with other countless evil acts perpretrated against human beings using the same "moral" standards.


30 August 2011 Last updated at 04:20 ET
US scientists 'knew Guatemala syphilis tests unethical'

US government scientists who infected Guatemalans with syphilis and gonorrhoea as part of a study knew they were violating ethical rules, a US presidential panel has said.

The researchers infected hundreds of prisoners, psychiatric patients and sex workers during the 1940s to study the effects of penicillin.

None of the Guatemalans was informed.

But many of the same scientists had sought consent from participants in an earlier study in the US.

More:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-14712089

boppers

(16,588 posts)
8. The US is also killing off huge amounts of leftists with heart disease.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:03 AM
Dec 2011

Sometimes, they combine heart disease and cancer, because the two are so common in older patients, nobody would suspect that it's *really* a conspiracy, rather than being a simple matter of getting older.

In addition, the US is also conspiring to make people delusional and paranoid as they get older. Again, nobody notices, because it looks just like normal human life degrading in front of them.

In a few years, Chavez might have to wonder if his memory loss, anger, and confusion, is the product of a US conspiracy, as well.






Yeah.

Having nursed more than a few people through this rough time in life, maybe it's time to step down, as the symptoms get worse.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. +1
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:43 AM
Dec 2011

I love conspiracy theories because they reveal the kinds of questions people are asking -- although they rarely provide accurate answers to the questions.

But Chavez's theory is way, way, way too crazy.

It would be very difficult to poison these leaders without poisoning other people around them.

I seriously doubt that any sort of hit men could get close enough to the president of a country to inject something into them or send a beam to them or put some poison in their drink.

What an absurd thought on Chavez's part.

Dover

(19,788 posts)
11. So you think Bush's reinstituting the policy allowing for the assassination of world leaders was a
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:21 AM
Dec 2011

bluff?

I think if you are a world leader who knows you are in the crosshairs of the U.S. and its western allies,
you had better watch your back and expect anything. They've already tried to get rid of Chavez so he's
well within the parameters of reality in wondering about this. The rise of the left by our immediate southern
neighbors and our loss of power in the region is, I am sure, sounding big alarms in the dark corners of power in the U.S.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
12. The rise of the left in South America has been a huge blow to the Global Capitalists.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:48 AM
Dec 2011

If I knew how cancer could be transmitted to Latin American leaders, it would not surprise me. But how possible would that be? And it doesn't have to be the US. There are other Globalists like the major Oil Cartels who would not be too upset to see South America lose its democratically elected leaders and help replace them with more compliant Rightwing dictators, again. It's not like it has not happened before, the replacement of democratically elected leaders in that part of the world, I mean.

He is not crazy to consider it and smart to say it publicly just in case he should have a sudden urge to suicide himself or have some kind of 'tragic accident'. He's a smart guy and has stated in the past he might be assassinated because of his policies which focus on the poor. Could be he got some information and decided to let them know he knows and won't be quiet about it.

Anyone who thinks his accusation is 'crazy' must not be aware of the US backed coup in 2002 that failed. Condi pretty much gave away that the US was involved in that.

Dover

(19,788 posts)
15. Agreed. A huge blow. I also think perhaps there may have been some expectation that we, the U.S.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:53 AM
Dec 2011

would be joined by South America in forming a large western hemisphere trading bloc. And all those oil and other resources
so close yet so far now from our grasp. I think the southern leaders (under Chavez's prompting) were wise to join
forces and link arms or the US would have used the insideous 'free market' takeover and any other sordid attempts in our bag of tricks to secure our power in that region.
We tried to do that in Russia by hooking up with some of the big western-friendly oil oligarchs who had seized so many of Russia's resources. But Putin saw the writing on the wall and kicked them AND us out and nationalized/ reclaimed those resources. The same is happening in South America. The jig is up for free market capitalists. The tide has turned and something new is trying to emerge though it's unclear exactly what that is because regardless of what world leaders would like to implement, the people all over the world are fed up with deeply entrenched corruption, regardless of the system. Now Africa is in the sights of resource-hungry countries
.... and on it goes. Clearly a very simplified version of a complex situation, but I think that's the basics.

Meanwhile, the icecaps are melting at record speed...

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
13. It's possible, but using poisons or radioactive rays or whatever to do it
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:05 AM
Dec 2011

sounds like science fiction. Trying to give people cancer would be an unreliable and very slow way to change politics.

This would make no sense.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,996 posts)
14. "They WOULD do it" is equivalent to "they DID do it" when there's moral indigation to be had.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:45 AM
Dec 2011

Ever notice how Chavez lickspittles go from "maybe" to "definitely" in less than a second?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
25. Is ''lickspittle'' another word for ''conspiracy nut''?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 09:45 AM
Dec 2011

Anyway, you must have forgotten how CIA used American children in radiation experiments.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3312956

"Lickspittle." Good one! Like "Quisling."

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
17. It is science fiction. Robin Cook beat Chavez to this over 20 years ago
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 04:59 AM
Dec 2011

In his 1989 book 'Mutation' (which completely sucked, BTW).

The plot centers around a genetically-engineered genius kid who (surprise, surprise) turns out to be evil. He removes people standing in the way of his nefarious plans by giving them liver cancer, which he figured out how to do thanks to his evil super-genius powers.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
19. I can believe I am targeted for death by bush, or space nazis, or whatever....
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:50 AM
Dec 2011

It's time for somebody to step up, or see Chavez do to the South what Lenin did to the North.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
67. Ah, so you're saying that although you think the idea is absurd, you would approve?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:02 PM
Dec 2011

Or what am I to take of your statement, "It's time for somebody to step up, or see Chavez do to the South what Lenin did to the North."

Sounds like you don't believe the USG gave him cancer, but you think they should have.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
96. Or I believe insane, and delusional people, kill.
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 06:47 AM
Dec 2011

Regardless of the source for their infirmity.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
99. You seem to be confusing the killers and their targets, however.
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 10:10 AM
Dec 2011

Also, you seem to forget that sane and rational people also kill. There are entire agencies of supposedly democratic governments devoted to killing, indeed to murder. The US government especially. In the past it has committed aggression against Venezuela and Chavez's government in particular. This has gone unpunished, not even an apology. Based on its continuing rhetoric and past record, it's likely the aggression continues. If you're a citizen of this nation, and thus in a better position to do something about it, your government's aggression should concern you a lot more than making up your defamations and lies about Chavez.

What did you mean by "it's time for somebody to step up"? In context, it sounds like your approval of an assassination attempt on Chavez. Please feel free to clarify your statement and correct any misconceptions.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
101. What did I mean?
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 05:28 PM
Dec 2011

I meant that Chavez is increasingly erratic and delusional, and is at risk of destroying any good he has done, and needs to step aside voluntarily or otherwise be removed from power. A delusional, paranoid, interpretation of that may be "they're trying to kill me!". As demonstrated.

As far as the imagined US "aggression", it's all pretty much the same pattern, where a US airplane flies near Venezuela, and Chavez freaks out about "being invaded", American intelligence warns Chavez about an internal threat and he declares "the US is trying to assassiinate me"!, an attempted coup take place and Chavez blames the US for it, aid is given to other governments and Chavez interprets it as a personal attack, etc.

It's always about some nefarious, external, threat, because the delusional cannot accept that they are aiding, and indeed, creating, their sense (and thus, their reality) of persecution.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
102. Yes, but what did you mean by "it's time for somebody to step up"?
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 05:38 PM
Dec 2011

That is, before Chavez does to South America what Lenin did to Russia, as you added? This implies something very, very bad, a threat to humanity.

So who is this someone and what is the meaning of "stepping up" in the context of a discussion in which Chavez thinks there are already assassination attempts on him?

It sounds like you think he should be assassinated. So please explain.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
103. You don't know how podiums work?
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 06:28 PM
Dec 2011

Different people step up to the podium to speak. It's time for somebody to take the reins, grab the wheel, man the rudder,... choose your metaphor.

I don't know how you get assassination out of that, other than maybe giving credence to Chavez's weird delusions.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
23. JD, a few years ago, Drone strikes would have been
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 09:30 AM
Dec 2011

considered "crazy."
This "Brave New World" holds many surprises for for all, IMO.
When Chavez said this, he commented that he was just "thinking out loud." Personally, the rapid State Department response surprised me, especially since he used that caveat and never made an actual accusation....

 

DissedByBush

(3,342 posts)
45. Why would drone strikes have been considered crazy?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:42 AM
Dec 2011

For decades countries have been trying to extend the idea that we sit over here with our soldiers safe while we kill the enemy with our extended-range weapons, extend the stand-off.

British longbowmen with their barrages,

Field artillery

Airplanes with bombs

Airplanes with smart guided bombs

ICBMs

Cruise missiles from the poorly guided German V-1 to the Tomahawk

Then we got more efficient, lower-cost, long stand-off, and extremely accurate with no danger to our own forces: the armed drone.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
97. We've using man-less munitions for over 50 years.
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 06:50 AM
Dec 2011

"crazy"?

Only to those who ignored newspapers, radio, books, and television.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
34. How do you know others around them haven't gotten cancer?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 10:41 AM
Dec 2011

And as for getting close enough to do physical harm? Really? You think it's impossible?

I don't particularly believe in this theory, though I think it's a possibility well within US capabilities, but that's because cancer is slow and probably unreliable as a form of assassination, and it can be treated and cured.

I'd say a sudden heart attack or stroke would be a better method.

edited to add more

boppers

(16,588 posts)
98. Everybody I know, and everybody you know, has cancer.
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 06:59 AM
Dec 2011

It's a byproduct of being on a radioactive planet. For over 4,000,000,000 years, our ancestors have been fighting it.

It's not a matter of "getting it", it's a matter of "your body looses to it".

You have cancerous cells in your body, right now. They will likely be killed soon.

Some don't.

AikidoSoul

(2,150 posts)
94. Low level chronic neurotoxic exposures are commonly used to kill, maim and disable political/
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:41 PM
Dec 2011

economic targets. It's been done many times, and continues. Unless you have become extremely chemically sensitive (as I am) you would not notice. When exposed to neurotoxicants in the air, I become immediately disoriented, ditsy, have difficulty concentrating, get tightness in the neck and shoulders, headaches, joint pain...and the list goes on. There are many people in the world now who have this illness.

Was it a coincidence that I was poisoned with organophosphate, carbamate, and pyrethroid pesticides (that I never used myself) during the period when I started the Perot for President campaign in the U.S? According to the Perot Group I was the first person in the U.S. to call Perot to try to convince him to run for president. I drove all over Florida getting support from individuals and groups. It was during this period that my spouse and I became ill with multiple chronic problems. Both of us at the same time. We were in our forties. I never suspected anything at the time, but I was still quite innocent and thought people were rarely capable of evil. That has changed. My spouse and I were also followed, our phones were tapped, and many CIA types infiltrated our movement during the Perot for President movement in Florida.

The results of our being chronically poisoned by these pesticides was devastating to our health. We not only almost died, we became impoverished from huge medical bills. The fact that the poisoning was low level over a long period made it undetectible at the time. It took us nine months to discover the source! By then it was too late.

As for chemically induced chemical sensitivity and the horrible, disabling chronic health issues that follow being chronically poisoned, here's a YouTube item on the topic from Spain. The problem is now worldwide thanks to pervasive neurotoxic chemicals.

www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Op-wNt24SN0

For the chemically sensitive, it's interesting to note that when the triggering chemicals are no longer present the symptoms resolve, IF the target normally is able to maintain a low toxicant environment. As long as the air is good, the symptoms resolve. Breathing toxicants at low levels over a long period is the fastest way to become ill (think too that this is the way that drugs enter the system the quickest). There is NO blood brain barrier between the nose and the brain. Neurotoxicants inhaled go directly to the brain and immediately into the bloodstream.

Dump some chemicals in the area near the target and he and /or she will become incapacitated by illness, as will their loved ones and pets.

And then there is the general population. The chem/pharm industry purposefully impregnates countless commonly used materials with neurotoxins, endocrine disrupters, and other poisons. We and our pets become ill and we them treat our symptoms with the poisoner's products! What a business plan!

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
50. Sure...
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:51 AM
Dec 2011

Because assassination never happens in Latin America and the US has never supported covert action there in history.


As to the specifics even I, a simple layman, had conceived of a cancer-causing weapon over a decade ago. It could be devised using directed radiation, though I had difficulty thinking of a way that it could be sufficiently portable, reliable, or predictable.

NuttyFluffers

(6,811 posts)
20. vocalized musing receives a pro forma, news at 11.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:54 AM
Dec 2011

sigh... my media ennui is setting in again.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(24,681 posts)
21. I didn't think the U.S. was doing cancerous assassinations
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 08:29 AM
Dec 2011

... but now that our State Department is bothering to deny it ...


dotymed

(5,610 posts)
24. "Horrific and reprehensible" describes "our"
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 09:37 AM
Dec 2011

actions in attempting to overthrow Chavez and all left leaning leaders up to this point. So is this a backhanded admission to a comment that was never an accusation?

obamanut2012

(29,369 posts)
26. I don't really believe this, however
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 09:49 AM
Dec 2011

The US Government, including the CIA, has done some weird and awful things in Central and SA the last 100 years or so.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
30. I think it's funny he got them to deny it.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 10:27 AM
Dec 2011

Reminds me of the old LBJ joke:

DID HE OR DIDN'T HE?....This story may or may not be true, but legend has it that during one of Lyndon Johnson's congressional campaigns he decided to spread a rumor that his opponent was a pig-fucker. LBJ's campaign manager said, "Lyndon, you know he doesn't do that!" Johnson replied, "I know. I just want to make him deny it."

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_09/009566.php

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
42. How did 'he' get them to deny it? Victoria Nuland was asked a question by a reporter
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:39 AM
Dec 2011

at the regular State Sept. briefing. The State Department denied nothing...merely noted that the statements were horrifying.

You might try to pass this off as evidence of Chavez's deft diplomacy, but I think you fail.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
31. Apply some common sense
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 10:28 AM
Dec 2011

If we were able to get close enough to Chavez (or any other leader) to introduce cancer, which may or may not be curable, into their body, why wouldn't we introduce something that acted quicker and was incurable?

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
38. She was asked a direct question by a reporter.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:34 AM
Dec 2011

It took me 5 seconds to find it on the google.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
44. So, having been proven incorrect, you now grouse about her form?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:42 AM
Dec 2011

As I pointed out above thread, the State Dept. did not comment on Hugo until asked.

This was not, as you have attempted to claim, Hugo showing deft 'diplomacy.'

So you fall back on Nuland not answering the question as you think she ought to have???

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
47. "Proven"?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:45 AM
Dec 2011

You are a wizard of logic, eh?

I have to go now, I can tell you are getting upset.

 

DissedByBush

(3,342 posts)
48. The best response would have been
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:46 AM
Dec 2011

"We are not going to dignify that with a response."

My smart ass would have said "We are currently preparing an emergency humanitarian shipment of tin foil for Mr. Chavez."

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
36. Um, it was a State Department briefing, and she was asked a direct question.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:33 AM
Dec 2011

The State Department gives regular briefings. In it, the Dept. spokeswoman is asked questions. Afterwards, the transcript is released, with topics helpfully indexed so that you can find them....I swear this only took me 5 seconds on the google.


"QUESTION: Thanks. The president of Iran will be in four Latin American countries in January, including Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, and Ecuador. Can you tell us about that?

And the second question is: Yesterday, the President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez said that U.S. may have created a new technology to induce cancer in Latin American presidents who are enemies of United States. What would you say to Chavez?

MS. NULAND: Well, first, with regard to the Iranian tour of Latin American countries, let me refer you to Iran and to the countries that the leader is visiting. Our hope and expectation is that these will increase the pressure on Iran.

With regard to the Chavez statements, let me simply say that they are horrific and reprehensible."

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2011/12/179774.htm#VENEZUELA


 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
51. Especially when 5 seconds on it dispels notions of Chavez's diplomatic prowess.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:59 AM
Dec 2011

Above thread, you actually tried to suggest that this was part of a Chavez plan to get us to deny 'pig-fucking.' I think you failed.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
60. That Chavez is a clown is something you and I agree upon. The people of Venezuela, however, pay the
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 12:28 PM
Dec 2011

price for his frivolity.

Solly Mack

(96,943 posts)
46. LOL Thank you! I assumed it was during a Q&A, as I didn't assume Nuland was a blurter who had
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:44 AM
Dec 2011

reporters glued to her side least she blurt something worth reporting. lololol

Doesn't change how funny it is though. I do so get a kick out of people being defensive over nothing. lol

LiberalLovinLug

(14,689 posts)
83. Notice Ms. Nuland never denied it.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 06:28 PM
Dec 2011

"...let me simply say that they are horrific and reprehensible."

Not that she would be told of it, but puleeeze, as if the US has never participated in anything that could be described like that.



How can anyone say for sure that the US military and the CIA, with their billions in top secret weapon development, could not have developed a way to "infect" someone with cancer? Its a perfect bullet, because you'd be able to rely on even the most left wing, anti-establishment DUer to scoff at the idea.

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
63. Because the US plotting to kill other countries' leaders would be so very new and unlikely . . .
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 01:02 PM
Dec 2011

Yeah, right.

Ike authorized the CIA to poison Patrice Lumumba, the Congolese leader, for starters.

And for you naysayers who think this is a "conspiracy theory" - consider the source, Time Magazine, not exactly Prison Planet.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,132849,00.html

You can also read the (watered down) Church Committee Report from the 1970s about CIA assassination attempts on Trujillo, Castro, Diem and others.

And much, much more . . .

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
69. That's what they said about Mario Savio
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:20 PM
Dec 2011

And now people revere him.

Hugo Chavez certainly has his problems, and in this case he may very well be wrong, but it is hardly crazy to speculate that the US would assassinate the leaders of other nations.

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
76. Oh please
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:38 PM
Dec 2011

I wasn't dissing' him.

I was trying to show you that the US has hatched similar plots before, which means it is not exactly out of the question.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
81. Against Mario Savio? Mario Savio died because of AF.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 06:03 PM
Dec 2011

He'd had symptoms for decades. Jeebus.

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
86. It's called an analogy
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 09:06 PM
Dec 2011

Most disagreed with Savio's views in 1964 but years later facts emerged that tended to bolster his views. Now they name things at Berkeleyafter him.

You call Chavez "batshit nuts" but there is precedent in the USG for such actions. Like Savio, he is saying something people scoffed at and 30 years from now facts may prove him right.

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
78. Read misanthrope sig line
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:40 PM
Dec 2011

And then my post about Mario Savio.

It should make sense in context.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
79. I understand all that. I just think he is an obscure American and not revered. That's all. nt
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 05:47 PM
Dec 2011
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
92. Who said you're a Republican? Just pointing you to a "revered American."
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 10:51 PM
Dec 2011

Maybe you can come up with a reverence rating system and rank Savio for us. Thanks.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
95. Well - being reasonably well known to a majority of Americans would be a good starting point.
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 01:07 AM
Dec 2011

I guess in his case, there is a very small but passionate group that might revere him.

marasinghe

(1,253 posts)
93. speaking of 'batshit' insane, ever see the Clooney movie: "Men who stare at Goats"?
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 11:12 PM
Dec 2011

link to the Wiki- article on the book behind the movie:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Men_Who_Stare_at_Goats

this is what UK Channel 4 TV had to say about their series, "Crazy Rulers of the World", one episode of which was based on "The Men Who Stare at Goats".
quote/.... The idea of the project was to explore "the apparent madness at the heart of U.S. military intelligence." ..../unquote.

welcome to the mind of the fascist goon.
;P

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
68. The only honest answer Ms. Nuland could have given...
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:07 PM
Dec 2011

would have been, "I can't say as I do not have the clearance to know whether a US government program of assassination by inducing cancer exists. If I did have the clearance to know, I still would not be allowed to disclose it. If such a program did exist, it would not formally reside in the State Department."

In fact, "I don't know and if I did I couldn't tell you" should cover at least half the questions advanced to her and most other PR personnel of opaque organizations, like the agencies of the USG. They should wear a button that says that, would save a lot of time.

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
71. Seriously if the US wanted to assassinate these Latin American leaders
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:41 PM
Dec 2011

they'd use a much more efficient method.

Another Chavez fail. This guy is a hoot.

cstanleytech

(28,473 posts)
72. Exactly, if they wanted to send a "warning" they would do something like
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 02:53 PM
Dec 2011

a drone attack or something.
The fact is many people get cancer ever year around the world http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/2011/ReportNation2011Release and its not some vast conspiracy against leaders in south america or Chavez because if the US wanted him dead he would be dead by now and he needs to stop speculating about insane things like this and focus on fixing his countries problems.

cstanleytech

(28,473 posts)
85. Yup just like Castro since he is 85 years old the odds are higher and higher something would get him
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 07:40 PM
Dec 2011

eventually just like something will get all of us eventually, might be heart issues, could be stroke or any number of things but we all will die someday from something.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
80. They did try what they thought was a 'more efficient method'
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 06:02 PM
Dec 2011

to oust Chavez in 2002, but the Venezuelan people had had enough of Global Capitalist interference in their affairs.

Chavez is a hoot, and very clever. He is alerting the world to the possibility of an attack on him, and since the world knows it happened before, I doubt his making this public will be seen as anything more than a message. I mean it's not as if the US was not involved in ousting other South American leaders who made the mistake of thinking their resources belonged to them. The people of that region of the world probably remember clearly since it is not that long ago and trials of some of our former dictator friends are ongoing now, decades later, what interference in their affairs by the US and Global Oil cartels did to their countries. I'm sure they at least will not dismiss his statements.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
82. And the kicker is that each one has done quite well
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 06:15 PM
Dec 2011

in the fight against it:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-16359062

Every single one has had a good outcome and Fernandez' prognosis is good.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
88. He's probably thinking of 'The Karen Silkwood Story.'
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 10:13 PM
Dec 2011

Possibly sees himself as wearing the mantle of Salvador Allende. I'm always on the fence with this kind of stuff.

Regime change can happen publicly by military might or mob, or stealth. The 1% have been slaughtering each other for millenia. Nothing new.


 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
106. On the basis of this topic, I'm going to buy stock in every tin foil-related company I can find.
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 01:47 PM
Jan 2012

Stuff like this is gonna send my kids to some very good Universities.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
109. Perhaps regulations are to blame, as in the lack of.
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 06:56 PM
Jan 2012

I wonder at the strength of the various governments EPA's, are they more easily bribed, are regulations just looser, oversight? There is just as much potential for industry to poison water, food and air in South America as anywhere.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US rejects Hugo Chavez re...